Avalia??o formativa em um contexto de educa??o corporativa : uma narrativa com enfoque pedag?gico

• Main Author: Casaletti, B?rbara Burgardt
• Other Authors: Fernandes, Cleoni Maria Barboza
• Format: Others
• Language: Portuguese
• Published: Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul 2017
• Subjects: EDUCA??O CORPORATIVA; FUNCION?RIOS P?BLICOS; POL?TICA EDUCACIONAL; EDUCA??O; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Online Access: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7191

Submitted by Caroline Xavier ([e-mail]) on 2017-03-27T18:25:02Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_BARBARA_BURGARDT_CASALETTI_COMPLETO.pdf: 767639 bytes, checksum: 62ca192e9ae9e952b07c31afc62b9efe (MD5) === Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-27T18:25:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_BARBARA_BURGARDT_CASALETTI_COMPLETO.pdf: 767639 bytes, checksum: 62ca192e9ae9e952b07c31afc62b9efe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-01-18 === This thesis was elaborated in the research line Education, Policies and Practices in Education of the Program of Post-Graduation in Education of PUCRS and investigated how the evaluation of training and improvement actions in a corporate education context is being carried out. Its construction is inspired by the Resolutions of the National Council of Justice ? CNJ ? and the Superior Council of Labor Justice - CSJT, which deal with the national policy of training and perfecting the servants of the Judiciary, as well as the national policy of education for servers of Labor Justice of first and second degree. In the process of data collection, the interview was used, which, according to Severino (2013), provides an interaction between the researcher and his interlocutors. The respondents were chosen intentionally within the universe investigated and the approach of the interviews (semi-structured) and the other data collected were submitted to discursive textual analysis, according to terms proposed by Moraes and Galliazzi (2011), the following categories being previously defined were: 1?) assessment and reaction; 2?) learning assessment; 3?) application assessment; 4?) outcome assessment. Those categories were chosen according to the content of the aforementioned Resolutions, where it is expected that ?training and improvement actions will be evaluated, whenever possible, by the organs of the judiciary, to guide new decision-making and the specificity of the Formative action in four dimensions: reaction, learning, application and outcome? (Resolution CNJ n? 192/2014 and Resolution CSJT n? 159/2015). In addition, the studies of Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick (2010a, 2010b) were also considered. The narrative as method was assumed, in the terms proposed by Clandinin and Connelly (2000), where the temporality and the stories lived and narrated are considered. === Esta tese foi elaborada na linha de pesquisa Forma??o, Pol?ticas e Pr?ticas em Educa??o do Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o da PUCRS e investigou como est? sendo realizada a avalia??o das a??es de forma??o e aperfei?oamento em um contexto de educa??o corporativa. Sua constru??o inspira-se no contido em Resolu??es do Conselho Nacional de Justi?a ? CNJ e do Conselho Superior da Justi?a do Trabalho - CSJT, que tratam da pol?tica nacional de forma??o e aperfei?oamento dos servidores do Poder Judici?rio, bem como da pol?tica nacional de educa??o para servidores da Justi?a do Trabalho de primeiro e segundo graus. No processo de coleta de dados, foi utilizada a entrevista, que, de acordo com Severino (2013), proporciona uma intera??o entre pesquisador e pesquisado. Os respondentes foram escolhidos intencionalmente dentro do universo investigado e a abordagem do presente estudo foi qualitativa, onde as respostas ?s quest?es das entrevistas (semiestruturadas) e os demais dados coletados foram submetidos ? an?lise textual discursiva, nos termos propostos por Moraes e Galliazzi (2011), onde foram previamente definidas as seguintes categorias: 1?) avalia??o de rea??o; 2?) avalia??o de aprendizagem; 3?) avalia??o de aplica??o; 4?) avalia??o de resultado. Referidas categorias foram escolhidas em fun??o do teor das Resolu??es antes mencionadas, onde existe a previs?o de que as ?a??es de forma??o e aperfei?oamento sejam avaliadas, sempre que poss?vel, pelos ?rg?os do Poder Judici?rio, para orientar novas tomadas de decis?es e observada a especificidade da a??o formativa, em quatro dimens?es: rea??o, aprendizagem, aplica??o e resultado? (Resolu??o CNJ n? 192/2014 e Resolu??o CSJT n? 159/2015). Al?m disso, os estudos de Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick (2010a; 2010b) tamb?m foram considerados. A narrativa como m?todo foi assumida, nos termos propostos por Clandinin e Connelly (2000), onde a temporalidade e as hist?rias vividas e narradas s?o observadas.