| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 會計研究所 === 91 === CPAs were nervous when No.33 audit statement issued in 1999, because they thought if the Chinese phrase 「保證」was translated for the term of ‘’assurance’’ might increase their legal liability. Finally, the phrase 「保證」 was replaced to
「確信」, and the No.33 audit statement became the fastest modified statement in the series.
The subject discussed in this research is focused on the controversy occurred in the process of amending No.33 auditing statement. Through the poll (which is aimed at students of law and accounting departments) the research tried to find out if the phrases “wording”, ”comprehension”, and “specialty” would influence the cognition about CPA’s duties, and if there were any cross-effects between them.
The results show the factor “Wording” is significant to all cognition about CPA’s duties. The three factors are all significant to the cognition about “assured degree” and there is no cross-effects between them. But ”comprehension” is not significant to the cognition about CPA’s legal liabilities, also there are cross-effects between “wording” and “specialty”.
|
|---|
