Justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach

博士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 獸醫學研究所 === 102 === There are many arguments both for and against keeping pet birds. From the negative effects that captivity has on the health of the captive bird to the positive effects that companion animals such as birds have towards humans. This paper is intended to discuss and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shawn Peng, 彭仁隆
Other Authors: 昌勇費
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2014
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01625336665211703136
id ndltd-TW-102NTU05541012
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-102NTU055410122016-03-09T04:24:05Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01625336665211703136 Justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach 圈養鳥的動物福祉科學評鑑與倫理議題 Shawn Peng 彭仁隆 博士 國立臺灣大學 獸醫學研究所 102 There are many arguments both for and against keeping pet birds. From the negative effects that captivity has on the health of the captive bird to the positive effects that companion animals such as birds have towards humans. This paper is intended to discuss and investigate both the ethical and scientific arguments used as justification both for and against the keeping of birds as pets. We focus on discussing the issues relating directly to the physical and psychological well-being by two case studies, first study aims to investigate the essentialness of flight and welfare assessment of flight restraint in captive birds, using animal-based measurement. Ten wild-caught great mynahs (Acridotheres grandis) were chosen as subject and evaluated in pathology, ethology and physiology studies. We found that though wing amputation did not result in neuroma formation, strength of pectoralis muscle diminished significantly in birds with flight restraint. And the birds indicated higher preference for spaces that were bigger or with higher vertical space with or without food provided. The second study was to reduce feather-plucking behaviour in a pair of sulphur-crested cockatoos (Cacatua galerita) and to find the underlying cause of the behaviour. The study was carried out via the application of a number of treatments including medicine (Haloperidol), socialisation, training and feeding enrichment. These results of both studies are significant and can be concluded that it is not ethically right to keep birds as pets due to lack of stimulation in capativity and result in behavioural problems. Meanwhile, pet birds considered in poor welfare as limited flying space and the vertical altitude of the cage unless more efforts are taken such as carefully designed enclosures to meet better animal welfare. 昌勇費 2014 學位論文 ; thesis 80 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 博士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 獸醫學研究所 === 102 === There are many arguments both for and against keeping pet birds. From the negative effects that captivity has on the health of the captive bird to the positive effects that companion animals such as birds have towards humans. This paper is intended to discuss and investigate both the ethical and scientific arguments used as justification both for and against the keeping of birds as pets. We focus on discussing the issues relating directly to the physical and psychological well-being by two case studies, first study aims to investigate the essentialness of flight and welfare assessment of flight restraint in captive birds, using animal-based measurement. Ten wild-caught great mynahs (Acridotheres grandis) were chosen as subject and evaluated in pathology, ethology and physiology studies. We found that though wing amputation did not result in neuroma formation, strength of pectoralis muscle diminished significantly in birds with flight restraint. And the birds indicated higher preference for spaces that were bigger or with higher vertical space with or without food provided. The second study was to reduce feather-plucking behaviour in a pair of sulphur-crested cockatoos (Cacatua galerita) and to find the underlying cause of the behaviour. The study was carried out via the application of a number of treatments including medicine (Haloperidol), socialisation, training and feeding enrichment. These results of both studies are significant and can be concluded that it is not ethically right to keep birds as pets due to lack of stimulation in capativity and result in behavioural problems. Meanwhile, pet birds considered in poor welfare as limited flying space and the vertical altitude of the cage unless more efforts are taken such as carefully designed enclosures to meet better animal welfare.
author2 昌勇費
author_facet 昌勇費
Shawn Peng
彭仁隆
author Shawn Peng
彭仁隆
spellingShingle Shawn Peng
彭仁隆
Justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach
author_sort Shawn Peng
title Justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach
title_short Justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach
title_full Justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach
title_fullStr Justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach
title_full_unstemmed Justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach
title_sort justification of keeping pet birds – animal welfare science and ethics approach
publishDate 2014
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01625336665211703136
work_keys_str_mv AT shawnpeng justificationofkeepingpetbirdsanimalwelfarescienceandethicsapproach
AT péngrénlóng justificationofkeepingpetbirdsanimalwelfarescienceandethicsapproach
AT shawnpeng quānyǎngniǎodedòngwùfúzhǐkēxuépíngjiànyǔlúnlǐyìtí
AT péngrénlóng quānyǎngniǎodedòngwùfúzhǐkēxuépíngjiànyǔlúnlǐyìtí
_version_ 1718200475271036928