A Key Factor Mind Mapping Decision Model for Diabetic Education Information System

碩士 === 南開科技大學 === 福祉科技與服務管理所 === 103 === ABSTRACT Background: Diabetes has become the fastest growing chronic disease regarding prevalence in the 21st century, and it has been listed among the top 10 causes of death nationwide. To help patients with diabetes control their blood sugar, health educati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang Mei Chi, 黃玫娸
Other Authors: Chun Pei
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2015
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81702515592623052321
Description
Summary:碩士 === 南開科技大學 === 福祉科技與服務管理所 === 103 === ABSTRACT Background: Diabetes has become the fastest growing chronic disease regarding prevalence in the 21st century, and it has been listed among the top 10 causes of death nationwide. To help patients with diabetes control their blood sugar, health education regarding patients’ diet monitoring and self-management is crucial. Adopting information technology to provide health education is a current trend in hospitals, for not only offering patients timely consultation but also reducing labor costs. Constructing a highly efficient health education information platform is thus paramount. The main purpose of this research was to determine the key factors of the diabetic education information system as well as the importance of each factor. Research Method: The research involved qualitative and quantitative methods: The qualitative method involved using a modified Delphi method; the preliminary key factors, including major and minor key factors, were adopted from previous studies. Second, an expert questionnaire based on the modified Delphi method was employed to confirm the key factors. Finally, a mind map depicting the key factors was created. The quantitative method involved the use of a decision making trial and evaluation laboratory method to analyze the degree of relevance and the influence of the major key factors. An analytic hierarchy process was adopted to compute the weights and priority of the minor key factors. Finally, these results were integrated to complete a mind-mapping decision model. v Results and Discussion: The qualitative result confirmed by 20 experts after 2 rounds of expert questionnaire administration showed 5 major factors and 18 minor factors. The quantitative result from the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory showed that the major factor “system functions” was most relevant among the major factors and was also the factor that most influenced the other factors. “Professional personnel’s acceptance” was the factor that was most influenced by the other factors. Analysis of the minor factors identified using the analytic hierarchy process revealed that “physiological information” , “personal emergency services” , “medical habits” , “medical disputes” , and “establishment and maintenance costs” yielded the highest weighting under the major factors to which they belong. The qualitative and quantitative results were integrated and presented using a mind mapping decision model, which can be used to provide medical management with crucial information regarding system planning and resource distribution. Keywords: Diabetic education information system, Telecare, Mind mapping, Modified delphi method, Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)