Factors Influencing the Quality of Key Audit Matters Disclosure by Auditors

碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 會計學系 === 106 === A new guideline of audit report has been implemented in Taiwan since 2016. The guideline requires auditor to disclose key audit matters (KAMs) during audit procedures to increase the transparency and value of relevant information. To reduce information asymmetry...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YU, CHIUNG-HSIN, 余瓊杏
Other Authors: LEE, CHIEN-JAN
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2018
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ygwgt3
id ndltd-TW-106NTPU0385008
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-106NTPU03850082019-05-16T00:22:58Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ygwgt3 Factors Influencing the Quality of Key Audit Matters Disclosure by Auditors 影響會計師溝通關鍵查核事項品質之因素 YU, CHIUNG-HSIN 余瓊杏 碩士 國立臺北大學 會計學系 106 A new guideline of audit report has been implemented in Taiwan since 2016. The guideline requires auditor to disclose key audit matters (KAMs) during audit procedures to increase the transparency and value of relevant information. To reduce information asymmetry, the new regulation helps expected users of the financial statements to understand the audit reports emphasized by the auditor as well as the audit matters being used to communicate within the corporate governance. The study sample was collected from 1,587 stock exchange listing companies of Taiwan in 2016. Financial companies were excluded due to unique industrial characteristics. A total number of 3,407 key audit matters was analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient and regression method. Six metrics analysis was applied to determine the effect of each factor. The relationship between each modal variable and the quality of KAMs was discussed from two different aspects. Firstly, considering audit risk, the result showed positive correlation with the quality of KAMs when the audited company revealed net operating loss or negative abnormal return. A negative correlation was found between the importance of clients and the quality of KAMs. Secondly, the overall result failed to provide statistical significance from the aspect of corporate governance. However, a negative correlation existed between audit committee and the quality of KAMs. One possible explanation is that the audit committee was lack of full independence or did not function properly regardless of its legitimacy. Furthermore, the study evidence suggested that understandability of KAMs is the most distinct measure, whilst the specificity of KAMs is the least distinct measure in the evaluation of the quality of KAMs. LEE, CHIEN-JAN 李建然 2018 學位論文 ; thesis 110 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 會計學系 === 106 === A new guideline of audit report has been implemented in Taiwan since 2016. The guideline requires auditor to disclose key audit matters (KAMs) during audit procedures to increase the transparency and value of relevant information. To reduce information asymmetry, the new regulation helps expected users of the financial statements to understand the audit reports emphasized by the auditor as well as the audit matters being used to communicate within the corporate governance. The study sample was collected from 1,587 stock exchange listing companies of Taiwan in 2016. Financial companies were excluded due to unique industrial characteristics. A total number of 3,407 key audit matters was analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient and regression method. Six metrics analysis was applied to determine the effect of each factor. The relationship between each modal variable and the quality of KAMs was discussed from two different aspects. Firstly, considering audit risk, the result showed positive correlation with the quality of KAMs when the audited company revealed net operating loss or negative abnormal return. A negative correlation was found between the importance of clients and the quality of KAMs. Secondly, the overall result failed to provide statistical significance from the aspect of corporate governance. However, a negative correlation existed between audit committee and the quality of KAMs. One possible explanation is that the audit committee was lack of full independence or did not function properly regardless of its legitimacy. Furthermore, the study evidence suggested that understandability of KAMs is the most distinct measure, whilst the specificity of KAMs is the least distinct measure in the evaluation of the quality of KAMs.
author2 LEE, CHIEN-JAN
author_facet LEE, CHIEN-JAN
YU, CHIUNG-HSIN
余瓊杏
author YU, CHIUNG-HSIN
余瓊杏
spellingShingle YU, CHIUNG-HSIN
余瓊杏
Factors Influencing the Quality of Key Audit Matters Disclosure by Auditors
author_sort YU, CHIUNG-HSIN
title Factors Influencing the Quality of Key Audit Matters Disclosure by Auditors
title_short Factors Influencing the Quality of Key Audit Matters Disclosure by Auditors
title_full Factors Influencing the Quality of Key Audit Matters Disclosure by Auditors
title_fullStr Factors Influencing the Quality of Key Audit Matters Disclosure by Auditors
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing the Quality of Key Audit Matters Disclosure by Auditors
title_sort factors influencing the quality of key audit matters disclosure by auditors
publishDate 2018
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ygwgt3
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchiunghsin factorsinfluencingthequalityofkeyauditmattersdisclosurebyauditors
AT yúqióngxìng factorsinfluencingthequalityofkeyauditmattersdisclosurebyauditors
AT yuchiunghsin yǐngxiǎnghuìjìshīgōutōngguānjiàncháhéshìxiàngpǐnzhìzhīyīnsù
AT yúqióngxìng yǐngxiǎnghuìjìshīgōutōngguānjiàncháhéshìxiàngpǐnzhìzhīyīnsù
_version_ 1719165980727312384