Conceptual flux: The case against mental misrepresentation.
Naturalistic theories of the content of mental representations almost universally hold that mental content is a function of the use of mental representations. However, use theories of meaning have a problem explaining how misrepresentation could be possible. If all uses count in fixing meaning, then...
Main Author: | Perlman, Mark David. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Cummins, Robert |
Language: | en |
Published: |
The University of Arizona.
1994
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/186648 |
Similar Items
-
Misrepresentation and mental appearance
by: David Rosenthal -
Motivation, Misrepresentation, and Memory
by: Brady, Sara
Published: (2011) -
Children's understanding of misrepresentation
by: Parkin, Lindsay John
Published: (1994) -
Three Misrepresentations of Logic
by: Brian MacPherson
Published: (1999-01-01) -
Representation and misrepresentation of knowledge
by: Gerken, M.
Published: (2021)