Effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa

While bulimia nervosa may affect up to five percent of women attending general practice, little attention has been paid to the possibility of treating patients in primary care. Improvements have been reported in patients using cognitive behaviour, self-help manuals. General practitioners may be well...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Durand, Mary Alison Aine
Published: University College London (University of London) 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.414060
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-414060
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4140602015-03-20T03:55:05ZEffectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosaDurand, Mary Alison Aine2005While bulimia nervosa may affect up to five percent of women attending general practice, little attention has been paid to the possibility of treating patients in primary care. Improvements have been reported in patients using cognitive behaviour, self-help manuals. General practitioners may be well placed to support such patients. The study was designed to compare in a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial, the effectiveness of a general practice based self-help approach to the treatment of bulimia nervosa (a self-help manual with general practitioner support) with that of specialist out-patient treatment ascertain, through two postal questionnaires, general practitioners' views about the experience of supporting patients in primary care and explore, using qualitative and quantitative methods, patients' views of the treatment interventions. It was hypothesised that there would be no serious disadvantage in outcome for patients randomised to receive the self-help intervention in general practice compared to those receiving specialist care. Patients recruited from general practitioner referrals to specialist clinics were randomised to receive the general practice based self-help intervention (n=34) or specialist clinic treatment (n=34). The main outcome measure was the Bulimic Investigatory Test Edinburgh score assessed at baseline and at six and nine months. Secondary measures included eating pathology, depression, social adjustment and self-esteem. Seventy-four percent and 80% of patients were followed up at six and nine months respectively. An intention-to-treat analysis revealed that while bulimic symptoms declined in both groups over time, there was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. The general practitioner surveys and patients' subjective views highlighted advantages and drawbacks to the self-help approach, but suggested that in general neither patients nor general practitioners were averse to using a general practice based intervention. The study findings suggest that general practitioners should consider offering self-help interventions to patients who present with bulimia nervosa.616.852630689University College London (University of London)http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.414060http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1444643/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 616.852630689
spellingShingle 616.852630689
Durand, Mary Alison Aine
Effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa
description While bulimia nervosa may affect up to five percent of women attending general practice, little attention has been paid to the possibility of treating patients in primary care. Improvements have been reported in patients using cognitive behaviour, self-help manuals. General practitioners may be well placed to support such patients. The study was designed to compare in a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial, the effectiveness of a general practice based self-help approach to the treatment of bulimia nervosa (a self-help manual with general practitioner support) with that of specialist out-patient treatment ascertain, through two postal questionnaires, general practitioners' views about the experience of supporting patients in primary care and explore, using qualitative and quantitative methods, patients' views of the treatment interventions. It was hypothesised that there would be no serious disadvantage in outcome for patients randomised to receive the self-help intervention in general practice compared to those receiving specialist care. Patients recruited from general practitioner referrals to specialist clinics were randomised to receive the general practice based self-help intervention (n=34) or specialist clinic treatment (n=34). The main outcome measure was the Bulimic Investigatory Test Edinburgh score assessed at baseline and at six and nine months. Secondary measures included eating pathology, depression, social adjustment and self-esteem. Seventy-four percent and 80% of patients were followed up at six and nine months respectively. An intention-to-treat analysis revealed that while bulimic symptoms declined in both groups over time, there was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups. The general practitioner surveys and patients' subjective views highlighted advantages and drawbacks to the self-help approach, but suggested that in general neither patients nor general practitioners were averse to using a general practice based intervention. The study findings suggest that general practitioners should consider offering self-help interventions to patients who present with bulimia nervosa.
author Durand, Mary Alison Aine
author_facet Durand, Mary Alison Aine
author_sort Durand, Mary Alison Aine
title Effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa
title_short Effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa
title_full Effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa
title_fullStr Effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa
title_sort effectiveness of general practitioner supported self-help for bulimia nervosa
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2005
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.414060
work_keys_str_mv AT durandmaryalisonaine effectivenessofgeneralpractitionersupportedselfhelpforbulimianervosa
_version_ 1716782681819185152