Being reasonably moral : Prichard and the mistake of moral philosophy
The question ‘Why ought we to do what we think we ought to do?’ was said by H.A. Prichard to be an improper question, manifesting erroneous presuppositions about the nature of moral reasoning. Moral rationalists think it a legitimate question, and they maintain that we are rationally justified in ac...
Main Author: | Pryke, Miriam Jean Vivien Eve |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Pink, Thomas Leonard ; Gaita, Raimond Joseph ; Littlejohn, Clayton Mitchell |
Published: |
King's College London (University of London)
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.677192 |
Similar Items
-
An audience for moral philosophy?
by: Edelman, J. T.
Published: (1981) -
'Ought' and Moral Philosophy
by: Singleton, J.
Published: (1974) -
Wittgenstein and moral philosophy
by: Johnston, P.
Published: (1986) -
Moral theories and applied philosophy
by: Upton, H. R.
Published: (2000) -
Cora Diamond's Moral Philosophy
by: Agam-Segal, Reshef
Published: (2007)