Anxiety's ambiguity : via Kierkegaard & Heidegger

This dissertation produces a systematic account of anxiety, and does so by way of interpreting the account of anxiety given to us by Kierkegaard and Heidegger. The methodology of this dissertation is such that it interprets the anxiety in Kierkegaard through Heidegger’s lens, and also interprets the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haynes, Jeffrey
Published: University of Essex 2016
Subjects:
198
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.679508
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-679508
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6795082017-08-30T03:13:23ZAnxiety's ambiguity : via Kierkegaard & HeideggerHaynes, Jeffrey2016This dissertation produces a systematic account of anxiety, and does so by way of interpreting the account of anxiety given to us by Kierkegaard and Heidegger. The methodology of this dissertation is such that it interprets the anxiety in Kierkegaard through Heidegger’s lens, and also interprets the anxiety in Heidegger through Kierkegaard’s lens. By this method this dissertation harmonizes the accounts of anxiety in Kierkegaard and Heidegger, and in this way produces a systematic account of anxiety by way of these two authors. In particular, this dissertation argues that anxiety in both Kierkegaard and Heidegger has a particular structure: that it is ambiguous, which means that it is structurally constituted by an antipathy (a repulsion) and a sympathy (an attraction). In harmonizing Kierkegaard’s and Heidegger’s accounts of anxiety in this way, this dissertation produces a systematic account of ambiguous anxiety.198B Philosophy (General)University of Essexhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.679508http://repository.essex.ac.uk/15955/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 198
B Philosophy (General)
spellingShingle 198
B Philosophy (General)
Haynes, Jeffrey
Anxiety's ambiguity : via Kierkegaard & Heidegger
description This dissertation produces a systematic account of anxiety, and does so by way of interpreting the account of anxiety given to us by Kierkegaard and Heidegger. The methodology of this dissertation is such that it interprets the anxiety in Kierkegaard through Heidegger’s lens, and also interprets the anxiety in Heidegger through Kierkegaard’s lens. By this method this dissertation harmonizes the accounts of anxiety in Kierkegaard and Heidegger, and in this way produces a systematic account of anxiety by way of these two authors. In particular, this dissertation argues that anxiety in both Kierkegaard and Heidegger has a particular structure: that it is ambiguous, which means that it is structurally constituted by an antipathy (a repulsion) and a sympathy (an attraction). In harmonizing Kierkegaard’s and Heidegger’s accounts of anxiety in this way, this dissertation produces a systematic account of ambiguous anxiety.
author Haynes, Jeffrey
author_facet Haynes, Jeffrey
author_sort Haynes, Jeffrey
title Anxiety's ambiguity : via Kierkegaard & Heidegger
title_short Anxiety's ambiguity : via Kierkegaard & Heidegger
title_full Anxiety's ambiguity : via Kierkegaard & Heidegger
title_fullStr Anxiety's ambiguity : via Kierkegaard & Heidegger
title_full_unstemmed Anxiety's ambiguity : via Kierkegaard & Heidegger
title_sort anxiety's ambiguity : via kierkegaard & heidegger
publisher University of Essex
publishDate 2016
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.679508
work_keys_str_mv AT haynesjeffrey anxietysambiguityviakierkegaardheidegger
_version_ 1718520954884194304