The maturity of project management in engineering consulting firms

With a considerable number of built environment projects not being completed successfully, this study was undertaken to investigate how effectively consulting engineering firms are applying project management principles in the way they manage projects. This was achieved by measuring the project mana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Machite, Kennedy
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10948/18409
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-28634
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-nmmu-vital-286342018-07-20T04:09:36ZThe maturity of project management in engineering consulting firmsMachite, KennedyProject managementConsulting engineers -- South AfricaEngineering firms -- South AfricaWith a considerable number of built environment projects not being completed successfully, this study was undertaken to investigate how effectively consulting engineering firms are applying project management principles in the way they manage projects. This was achieved by measuring the project management maturity levels of consulting engineering firms. Maturity levels were measured for each of the ten knowledge areas of the Project Management Institute’s Project Management Body of Knowledge to determine areas where consulting engineering firms perform below expectation and as a result determine probable causes of project failures. The maturity of the firm was then calculated as the average of the maturity for the knowledge areas. The study found that consulting engineering firms have higher levels of project management maturity than the average for the construction and civil engineering sector. Apart from risk and procurement management, all the other knowledge areas have higher maturity levels than the corresponding construction and civil engineering knowledge areas. Although the overall maturity results indicate that the larger firms are more mature in their project management practices than the smaller firms, the individual knowledge areas are inconsistent. The study reveals that consulting engineering firms are weakest in the risk management, human resources and stakeholder management knowledge areas. There is limited literature available on the status of project management, project management methodologies, and performance of consulting projects in the engineering environment (Labuschagne & Steyn, 2010:70). There is need for future studies to establish a methodology developed specifically for the Consulting Engineering Firms in line with what Labuschagne & Steyn (2010) started and a Project Management Maturity Model specific to the Consulting Engineering Industry.Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityFaculty of Engineering, the Built Environment and Information Technology2016ThesisMastersMScxi, 100 leavespdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10948/18409vital:28634EnglishNelson Mandela Metropolitan University
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Project management
Consulting engineers -- South Africa
Engineering firms -- South Africa
spellingShingle Project management
Consulting engineers -- South Africa
Engineering firms -- South Africa
Machite, Kennedy
The maturity of project management in engineering consulting firms
description With a considerable number of built environment projects not being completed successfully, this study was undertaken to investigate how effectively consulting engineering firms are applying project management principles in the way they manage projects. This was achieved by measuring the project management maturity levels of consulting engineering firms. Maturity levels were measured for each of the ten knowledge areas of the Project Management Institute’s Project Management Body of Knowledge to determine areas where consulting engineering firms perform below expectation and as a result determine probable causes of project failures. The maturity of the firm was then calculated as the average of the maturity for the knowledge areas. The study found that consulting engineering firms have higher levels of project management maturity than the average for the construction and civil engineering sector. Apart from risk and procurement management, all the other knowledge areas have higher maturity levels than the corresponding construction and civil engineering knowledge areas. Although the overall maturity results indicate that the larger firms are more mature in their project management practices than the smaller firms, the individual knowledge areas are inconsistent. The study reveals that consulting engineering firms are weakest in the risk management, human resources and stakeholder management knowledge areas. There is limited literature available on the status of project management, project management methodologies, and performance of consulting projects in the engineering environment (Labuschagne & Steyn, 2010:70). There is need for future studies to establish a methodology developed specifically for the Consulting Engineering Firms in line with what Labuschagne & Steyn (2010) started and a Project Management Maturity Model specific to the Consulting Engineering Industry.
author Machite, Kennedy
author_facet Machite, Kennedy
author_sort Machite, Kennedy
title The maturity of project management in engineering consulting firms
title_short The maturity of project management in engineering consulting firms
title_full The maturity of project management in engineering consulting firms
title_fullStr The maturity of project management in engineering consulting firms
title_full_unstemmed The maturity of project management in engineering consulting firms
title_sort maturity of project management in engineering consulting firms
publisher Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10948/18409
work_keys_str_mv AT machitekennedy thematurityofprojectmanagementinengineeringconsultingfirms
AT machitekennedy maturityofprojectmanagementinengineeringconsultingfirms
_version_ 1718713079024320512