Documentation of Biodiversity Impacts (Including Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts) in Environmental Impact Statements
In the United States, biodiversity impact assessment has historically received little attention. Responding in 1993, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) released guidelines on incorporating biodiversity into environmental impact assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of North Texas
1998
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc278173/ |
id |
ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc278173 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc2781732020-07-15T07:09:31Z Documentation of Biodiversity Impacts (Including Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts) in Environmental Impact Statements Bhatia, Sarika Biodiversity impact assessment Environmental impact statements Environmental impact statements -- United States. Biodiversity -- United States. Environmental impact analysis -- United States. In the United States, biodiversity impact assessment has historically received little attention. Responding in 1993, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) released guidelines on incorporating biodiversity into environmental impact assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The objectives of the study here were to identify the level of documentation of biodiversity impact assessment in sample Environmental Impact Statements (EISs); identify whether in the years following the release of 1993 CEQ guidelines any significant changes have taken place in assessment of biodiversity; identify deficiencies, and if the need exists, formulate appropriate recommendations and approaches for addressing biodiversity in EISs. The study involved a systematic review of 30 EISs published since the release of CEQ guidelines, and five EISs published prior to it. The review involved answering a series of standard questions, which attempted to ascertain the level of biodiversity impacts included in each impact statement. Trends in approaches to biodiversity impact assessment were investigated and deficiencies summarized. The analysis resulted in a series of recommendations for improving the manner in which biodiversity impact assessment can be approached. University of North Texas Atkinson, Samuel F. Schoolmaster, Frank Andrew Waller, William T. 1998-08 Thesis or Dissertation viii, 111 leaves : ill., maps Text call-no: 379 N81 no.7598 local-cont-no: 1002659946-bhatia untcat: b2175618 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc278173/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc278173 English United States Public Copyright Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Bhatia, Sarika |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Biodiversity impact assessment Environmental impact statements Environmental impact statements -- United States. Biodiversity -- United States. Environmental impact analysis -- United States. |
spellingShingle |
Biodiversity impact assessment Environmental impact statements Environmental impact statements -- United States. Biodiversity -- United States. Environmental impact analysis -- United States. Bhatia, Sarika Documentation of Biodiversity Impacts (Including Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts) in Environmental Impact Statements |
description |
In the United States, biodiversity impact assessment has historically received little attention. Responding in 1993, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) released guidelines on incorporating biodiversity into environmental impact assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The objectives of the study here were to identify the level of documentation of biodiversity impact assessment in sample Environmental Impact Statements (EISs); identify whether in the years following the
release of 1993 CEQ guidelines any significant changes have taken place in assessment of biodiversity; identify deficiencies, and if the need exists, formulate appropriate recommendations and approaches for addressing biodiversity in EISs. The study involved a systematic review of 30 EISs published since the release of CEQ guidelines, and five EISs published prior to it. The review involved answering a series of standard questions, which attempted to ascertain the level of biodiversity impacts included in each
impact statement. Trends in approaches to biodiversity impact assessment were investigated and deficiencies summarized. The analysis resulted in a series of recommendations for improving the manner in which biodiversity impact assessment can be approached. |
author2 |
Atkinson, Samuel F. |
author_facet |
Atkinson, Samuel F. Bhatia, Sarika |
author |
Bhatia, Sarika |
author_sort |
Bhatia, Sarika |
title |
Documentation of Biodiversity Impacts (Including Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts) in Environmental Impact Statements |
title_short |
Documentation of Biodiversity Impacts (Including Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts) in Environmental Impact Statements |
title_full |
Documentation of Biodiversity Impacts (Including Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts) in Environmental Impact Statements |
title_fullStr |
Documentation of Biodiversity Impacts (Including Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts) in Environmental Impact Statements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Documentation of Biodiversity Impacts (Including Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts) in Environmental Impact Statements |
title_sort |
documentation of biodiversity impacts (including cumulative biodiversity impacts) in environmental impact statements |
publisher |
University of North Texas |
publishDate |
1998 |
url |
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc278173/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bhatiasarika documentationofbiodiversityimpactsincludingcumulativebiodiversityimpactsinenvironmentalimpactstatements |
_version_ |
1719328277955346432 |