The notion of Equity in the Determination of Maritime Boundaries and its Application to the Canada-United States Boundary in the Beaufort Sea

Of the maritime boundaries yet to be delimited between Canada and the United States, the Beaufort Sea might be the more pressing one, considering its strategic location in a rapidly developing Arctic region and its vast economic potential. In accordance with the Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS), m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: St-Louis, Carole
Other Authors: McRae, Donald
Language:en
Published: Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10393/31137
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-3751
id ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-31137
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-311372018-01-05T19:01:59Z The notion of Equity in the Determination of Maritime Boundaries and its Application to the Canada-United States Boundary in the Beaufort Sea St-Louis, Carole McRae, Donald maritime boundary law of the sea Beaufort Sea Equity continental shelf Of the maritime boundaries yet to be delimited between Canada and the United States, the Beaufort Sea might be the more pressing one, considering its strategic location in a rapidly developing Arctic region and its vast economic potential. In accordance with the Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS), maritime boundaries are to be delimited by agreement on the basis of international law as referred to in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, in order to reach an equitable solution. When an agreement cannot be reached, parties can resort to third-party arbitration. While jurisprudence has determined that international law does not mandate a particular method of delimitation, it requires the consideration of equitable principles, also called special circumstances or factors. The notion of equity is therefore the foundation of boundary determination. But, what is equity and how is it applied? This thesis examines the various forms of equity, their origins in legal philosophy and domestic law and how they have been incorporated in international law. The main focus, however, is to analyse the differences between how international tribunals or courts have interpreted and applied equity in boundary determination and how States have applied it in negotiated agreements. While tribunals have tended to consider equitable principles as equivalent to geographical proportionality, States have considered those principles more in keeping with the notion of distributive justice and, more and more, are taking a globalised approach to boundary determination. On the basis of this analysis, this thesis evaluates the potential outcome of a third-party arbitration of the Beaufort Sea boundary dispute between Canada and the United States as well as the options for settlement negotiations between the Parties. In the Beaufort Sea area where hydrocarbon development is intrinsically linked not only to the development of the local population but also to the entire Arctic region, be it on issues related to the environment, navigation or security, the thesis concludes that a third-party adjudication would not serve the interests of the States. As delimiting boundaries nowadays is only one aspect of the management of oceans related issues, interests are best served when delimitation is understood as part of this global approach. 2014-05-23T14:08:50Z 2014-05-23T14:08:50Z 2014 2014 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10393/31137 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-3751 en Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic maritime boundary
law of the sea
Beaufort Sea
Equity
continental shelf
spellingShingle maritime boundary
law of the sea
Beaufort Sea
Equity
continental shelf
St-Louis, Carole
The notion of Equity in the Determination of Maritime Boundaries and its Application to the Canada-United States Boundary in the Beaufort Sea
description Of the maritime boundaries yet to be delimited between Canada and the United States, the Beaufort Sea might be the more pressing one, considering its strategic location in a rapidly developing Arctic region and its vast economic potential. In accordance with the Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS), maritime boundaries are to be delimited by agreement on the basis of international law as referred to in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, in order to reach an equitable solution. When an agreement cannot be reached, parties can resort to third-party arbitration. While jurisprudence has determined that international law does not mandate a particular method of delimitation, it requires the consideration of equitable principles, also called special circumstances or factors. The notion of equity is therefore the foundation of boundary determination. But, what is equity and how is it applied? This thesis examines the various forms of equity, their origins in legal philosophy and domestic law and how they have been incorporated in international law. The main focus, however, is to analyse the differences between how international tribunals or courts have interpreted and applied equity in boundary determination and how States have applied it in negotiated agreements. While tribunals have tended to consider equitable principles as equivalent to geographical proportionality, States have considered those principles more in keeping with the notion of distributive justice and, more and more, are taking a globalised approach to boundary determination. On the basis of this analysis, this thesis evaluates the potential outcome of a third-party arbitration of the Beaufort Sea boundary dispute between Canada and the United States as well as the options for settlement negotiations between the Parties. In the Beaufort Sea area where hydrocarbon development is intrinsically linked not only to the development of the local population but also to the entire Arctic region, be it on issues related to the environment, navigation or security, the thesis concludes that a third-party adjudication would not serve the interests of the States. As delimiting boundaries nowadays is only one aspect of the management of oceans related issues, interests are best served when delimitation is understood as part of this global approach.
author2 McRae, Donald
author_facet McRae, Donald
St-Louis, Carole
author St-Louis, Carole
author_sort St-Louis, Carole
title The notion of Equity in the Determination of Maritime Boundaries and its Application to the Canada-United States Boundary in the Beaufort Sea
title_short The notion of Equity in the Determination of Maritime Boundaries and its Application to the Canada-United States Boundary in the Beaufort Sea
title_full The notion of Equity in the Determination of Maritime Boundaries and its Application to the Canada-United States Boundary in the Beaufort Sea
title_fullStr The notion of Equity in the Determination of Maritime Boundaries and its Application to the Canada-United States Boundary in the Beaufort Sea
title_full_unstemmed The notion of Equity in the Determination of Maritime Boundaries and its Application to the Canada-United States Boundary in the Beaufort Sea
title_sort notion of equity in the determination of maritime boundaries and its application to the canada-united states boundary in the beaufort sea
publisher Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10393/31137
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-3751
work_keys_str_mv AT stlouiscarole thenotionofequityinthedeterminationofmaritimeboundariesanditsapplicationtothecanadaunitedstatesboundaryinthebeaufortsea
AT stlouiscarole notionofequityinthedeterminationofmaritimeboundariesanditsapplicationtothecanadaunitedstatesboundaryinthebeaufortsea
_version_ 1718598040042864640