Treatment in Latent Tuberculosis Uveitis—Is Immunosuppression Effective or Is Conventional 3-or 4-Drug Antituberculosis Therapy Mandatory?

Background/Aims: Controversy exists regarding 3-or 4 drug antituberculosis therapy (conventional ATT) in uveitis patients having latent tuberculosis (LTB), especially while initiating therapy with corticosteroids and/or other immunosuppressants. Methods: We performed a monocentral retrospective anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bigdon, E. (Author), Durchkiv, V. (Author), Steinhorst, N.A (Author), Stübiger, N. (Author), Weissleder, S. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03279nam a2200253Ia 4500
001 10.3390-jcm11092419
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 20770383 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Treatment in Latent Tuberculosis Uveitis—Is Immunosuppression Effective or Is Conventional 3-or 4-Drug Antituberculosis Therapy Mandatory? 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092419 
520 3 |a Background/Aims: Controversy exists regarding 3-or 4 drug antituberculosis therapy (conventional ATT) in uveitis patients having latent tuberculosis (LTB), especially while initiating therapy with corticosteroids and/or other immunosuppressants. Methods: We performed a monocentral retrospective analysis of posterior uveitis patients with latent TB. Latent TB was diagnosed, in case of a positive QuantiFERON®-TB-Gold test and normal chest imaging, after ruling out other causes of infectious and noninfectious uveitis. Patients with active TB were excluded. From 2016 to 2020 we included 17 patients. Ophthalmological evaluation consisted of Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, OCT, and fluorescein-and indocyaningreenangiography before and at months 3, 6, 12, 24, and the last follow-up after treatment. Results: Initially, all patients had active posterior uveitis with occlusive (n = 5 patients) and nonocclusive retinal vasculitis (n = 12 patients). Mean follow up was 28 ± 15 months. Therapy was started with systemic corticosteroids (mean prednisolone equivalent 71.3 mg/d) and already after 3 months it could be tapered to a mean maintenance dosage of 8.63 mg/d. Additional immunosuppressive treatment with cs-or bDMARDs was initiated in 14 patients (82%) due to recurrences of uveitis while tapering the corticosteroids <10 mg per/day or because of severe inflammation at the initial visit. While being on immunosuppression, best corrected visual acuity increased from 0.56 logMAR to 0.32 logMAR during follow-up and only three patients had one uveitis relapse, which was followed by switch of immunosuppressive treatment. As recommended, TB prophylaxis with 300 mg/d isoniazid was administered in 11 patients for at least 9 months while being on TNF-alpha-blocking agents. No patient developed active tuberculosis during immunosuppressive therapy. Conclusion: Mainly conventional ATT is strongly recommended—as monotherapy or in combination with immunosuppressives—for effective treatment in patients with uveitis due to latent TB. Although in our patient group no conventional ATT was initiated, immunosuppression alone occurred as an efficient treatment. Nevertheless, due to possible activation of TB, isoniazid prophylaxis is mandatory in latent TB patients while being on TNF-alpha blocking agents. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a antituberculosis therapy 
650 0 4 |a immunosuppression 
650 0 4 |a latent tuberculosis 
650 0 4 |a posterior uveitis 
650 0 4 |a retinal vasculitis 
650 0 4 |a uveitis 
700 1 |a Bigdon, E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Durchkiv, V.  |e author 
700 1 |a Steinhorst, N.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Stübiger, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Weissleder, S.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Clinical Medicine