|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01481 am a22001453u 4500 |
| 001 |
144739 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Drieghe, Denis
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Rayner, Keith
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Pollatsek, Alexander
|e author
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading
|
| 260 |
|
|
|c 2008-08.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/144739/1/Drieghe%252C_Rayner_%2526_Pollatsek_%25282008%2529.pdf
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Contrasting predictions of serial and parallel views on the processing of foveal and parafoveal information during reading were tested. A high-frequency adjective (young) was followed by either a high-frequency wordn (child) or a low-frequency wordn (tenor), which in turn was followed by either a correct (performing) or an orthographic illegal wordn + 1 (pxvforming) as a parafoveal preview. A limited parafoveal-on-foveal effect was observed: There were inflated fixation times on wordn when the preview of wordn + 1 was orthographically illegal. However, this parafoveal-on-foveal effect was (a) independent of the frequency of wordn, (b) restricted to those instances when the eyes were very close to wordn + 1, and (c) associated with relatively long prior saccades. These observations are all compatible with a mislocated fixation account in which parafoveal-on-foveal effects result from saccadic undershoots of wordn + 1 and with a serial model of eye movement control during reading.
|
| 655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
