Search Results - D. G. Partridge

  • Showing 1 - 9 results of 9
Refine Results
  1. 1

    Satellite observations of cloud regime development: the role of aerosol processes by E. Gryspeerdt, P. Stier, D. G. Partridge

    Published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2014-02-01)
    Get full text
    Article


  2. 2

    Cloud condensation nuclei concentrations derived from the CAMS reanalysis by K. Block, M. Haghighatnasab, M. Haghighatnasab, D. G. Partridge, P. Stier, J. Quaas

    Published in Earth System Science Data (2024-01-01)
    Get full text
    Article


  3. 3

    Including ash in UKESM1 model simulations of the Raikoke volcanic eruption reveals improved agreement with observations by A. F. Wells, A. Jones, M. Osborne, L. Damany-Pearce, D. G. Partridge, J. M. Haywood, J. M. Haywood

    Published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2023-04-01)
    Get full text
    Article


  4. 4

    In-plume and out-of-plume analysis of aerosol–cloud interactions derived from the 2014–2015 Holuhraun volcanic eruption by A. H. Peace, A. H. Peace, Y. Chen, G. Jordan, D. G. Partridge, F. Malavelle, E. Duncan, J. M. Haywood, J. M. Haywood

    Published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2024-08-01)
    Get full text
    Article


  5. 5

    The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity by D. Neubauer, S. Ferrachat, C. Siegenthaler-Le Drian, P. Stier, D. G. Partridge, I. Tegen, I. Bey, I. Bey, T. Stanelle, H. Kokkola, U. Lohmann

    Published in Geoscientific Model Development (2019-08-01)
    Get full text
    Article


  6. 6

    Cloud response to co-condensation of water and organic vapors over the boreal forest by L. Heikkinen, L. Heikkinen, D. G. Partridge, S. Blichner, S. Blichner, W. Huang, R. Ranjan, R. Ranjan, P. Bowen, E. Tovazzi, T. Petäjä, C. Mohr, C. Mohr, I. Riipinen, I. Riipinen

    Published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2024-04-01)
    Get full text
    Article


  7. 7

    How well are aerosol–cloud interactions represented in climate models? – Part 1: Understanding the sulfate aerosol production from the 2014–15 Holuhraun eruption by G. Jordan, F. Malavelle, Y. Chen, A. Peace, E. Duncan, D. G. Partridge, P. Kim, D. Watson-Parris, T. Takemura, D. Neubauer, G. Myhre, R. Skeie, A. Laakso, J. Haywood, J. Haywood

    Published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2024-02-01)
    Get full text
    Article


  8. 8

    Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates by E. Gryspeerdt, J. Mülmenstädt, J. Mülmenstädt, A. Gettelman, F. F. Malavelle, F. F. Malavelle, H. Morrison, D. Neubauer, D. G. Partridge, P. Stier, T. Takemura, H. Wang, M. Wang, M. Wang, M. Wang, K. Zhang

    Published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2020-01-01)
    Get full text
    Article


  9. 9

    General circulation models simulate negative liquid water path–droplet number correlations, but anthropogenic aerosols still increase simulated liquid water path by J. Mülmenstädt, E. Gryspeerdt, S. Dipu, J. Quaas, A. S. Ackerman, A. M. Fridlind, F. Tornow, F. Tornow, S. E. Bauer, A. Gettelman, Y. Ming, Y. Zheng, Y. Zheng, P.-L. Ma, H. Wang, K. Zhang, M. W. Christensen, A. C. Varble, L. R. Leung, X. Liu, D. Neubauer, D. G. Partridge, P. Stier, T. Takemura

    Published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (2024-06-01)
    Get full text
    Article


Search Tools: