Passive Earth Pressure and Soil Arch Shape: A Two-Dimensional Analysis
This paper introduces an analytical method for passive earth pressure calculation based on a rigorous stress field analysis within the sliding wedge. Unlike traditional horizontal layer methods, this approach directly solves for the stress state at any point within the wedge by analyzing the equilib...
| Published in: | Applied Sciences |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/6345 |
| _version_ | 1849566856901296128 |
|---|---|
| author | Pengqiang Yu Kejia Wu Dongsheng Li Yang Liu |
| author_facet | Pengqiang Yu Kejia Wu Dongsheng Li Yang Liu |
| author_sort | Pengqiang Yu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Applied Sciences |
| description | This paper introduces an analytical method for passive earth pressure calculation based on a rigorous stress field analysis within the sliding wedge. Unlike traditional horizontal layer methods, this approach directly solves for the stress state at any point within the wedge by analyzing the equilibrium of 2D differential soil elements under appropriate boundary conditions, eliminating the need for a priori assumptions about the soil arch shape. The method yields the passive earth pressure distribution on the retaining structure and derives the soil arch shape analytically from major principal stress trajectories. This derived arch shape differs notably from conventional circular or parabolic assumptions, especially at higher soil–wall friction angles. Parametric studies show that the passive earth pressure coefficient increases with internal friction angle and surcharge. However, a key finding is the non-monotonic dependence of the passive earth pressure coefficient on the soil–wall friction angle, contrasting with many existing theories. Comparisons show predictions by the proposed method align well with experimental data, particularly offering a better representation of pressure distributions in the lower regions of retaining walls compared to Coulomb theory and other existing methods. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-001021ed7bf940b2a9861eeab9ceeee4 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2076-3417 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-001021ed7bf940b2a9861eeab9ceeee42025-08-20T02:32:52ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172025-06-011511634510.3390/app15116345Passive Earth Pressure and Soil Arch Shape: A Two-Dimensional AnalysisPengqiang Yu0Kejia Wu1Dongsheng Li2Yang Liu3School of Future Cities, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Future Cities, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Future Cities, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaSchool of Future Cities, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaThis paper introduces an analytical method for passive earth pressure calculation based on a rigorous stress field analysis within the sliding wedge. Unlike traditional horizontal layer methods, this approach directly solves for the stress state at any point within the wedge by analyzing the equilibrium of 2D differential soil elements under appropriate boundary conditions, eliminating the need for a priori assumptions about the soil arch shape. The method yields the passive earth pressure distribution on the retaining structure and derives the soil arch shape analytically from major principal stress trajectories. This derived arch shape differs notably from conventional circular or parabolic assumptions, especially at higher soil–wall friction angles. Parametric studies show that the passive earth pressure coefficient increases with internal friction angle and surcharge. However, a key finding is the non-monotonic dependence of the passive earth pressure coefficient on the soil–wall friction angle, contrasting with many existing theories. Comparisons show predictions by the proposed method align well with experimental data, particularly offering a better representation of pressure distributions in the lower regions of retaining walls compared to Coulomb theory and other existing methods.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/6345passive earth pressuresoil arching effecttwo-dimensional element analysismajor principal stress trajectoryretaining structures |
| spellingShingle | Pengqiang Yu Kejia Wu Dongsheng Li Yang Liu Passive Earth Pressure and Soil Arch Shape: A Two-Dimensional Analysis passive earth pressure soil arching effect two-dimensional element analysis major principal stress trajectory retaining structures |
| title | Passive Earth Pressure and Soil Arch Shape: A Two-Dimensional Analysis |
| title_full | Passive Earth Pressure and Soil Arch Shape: A Two-Dimensional Analysis |
| title_fullStr | Passive Earth Pressure and Soil Arch Shape: A Two-Dimensional Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Passive Earth Pressure and Soil Arch Shape: A Two-Dimensional Analysis |
| title_short | Passive Earth Pressure and Soil Arch Shape: A Two-Dimensional Analysis |
| title_sort | passive earth pressure and soil arch shape a two dimensional analysis |
| topic | passive earth pressure soil arching effect two-dimensional element analysis major principal stress trajectory retaining structures |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/11/6345 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pengqiangyu passiveearthpressureandsoilarchshapeatwodimensionalanalysis AT kejiawu passiveearthpressureandsoilarchshapeatwodimensionalanalysis AT dongshengli passiveearthpressureandsoilarchshapeatwodimensionalanalysis AT yangliu passiveearthpressureandsoilarchshapeatwodimensionalanalysis |
