Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening

ABSTRACT Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening due to its sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Most of the cervical cancers are caused by HPV16 and HPV18, and their presence has been used to guide patient management. Here, we com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microbiology Spectrum
Main Authors: Shihai Huang, Luciana Girotto Gentil, Colleen Schmidt, Richard Cullum, Yan Zhang, Kevin Nelson, Danijela Lucic, Klara Abravaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2025-09-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00589-25
_version_ 1849320551736147968
author Shihai Huang
Luciana Girotto Gentil
Colleen Schmidt
Richard Cullum
Yan Zhang
Kevin Nelson
Danijela Lucic
Klara Abravaya
author_facet Shihai Huang
Luciana Girotto Gentil
Colleen Schmidt
Richard Cullum
Yan Zhang
Kevin Nelson
Danijela Lucic
Klara Abravaya
author_sort Shihai Huang
collection DOAJ
container_title Microbiology Spectrum
description ABSTRACT Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening due to its sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Most of the cervical cancers are caused by HPV16 and HPV18, and their presence has been used to guide patient management. Here, we compared the clinical performance of the Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays in the context of cervical cancer screening. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated with 125 ≥CIN3 (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3) cases and 244 controls (≤CIN1). The genotype agreements between the assays were also evaluated for the case and control groups. The clinical sensitivities were 96.0% for Alinity m and cobas 6800 assays, and 95.2% for cobas 4800 assay. The clinical specificities observed were 67.6%, 68.0%, and 68.4% for Alinity m, cobas 6800, and cobas 4800 assays, respectively. Overall, the three HPV assays demonstrated similar clinical performance. In the ≥CIN3 group, genotype-specific positive agreement was ≥98.4% between Alinity m and cobas 4800 assays, and ≥85.7% between cobas 6800 and cobas 4800 assays. In the ≤CIN1 group, overall positive agreement among the three assays was ≥94.8%. This study showed similar clinical sensitivity and specificity for Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays. Alinity m was more specific in detecting HPV16 and HPV18, which could reduce unnecessary immediate referrals of women to colposcopy.IMPORTANCEThis study provides evidence that the Alinity m HR human papillomavirus (HPV) assay has similar clinical performance in comparison with the cobas 4800 HPV and cobas 6800 HPV, two widely used tests. Validation of HPV assays in a clinical setting is crucial to ensure that they can provide a balanced sensitivity and specificity for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, potentially improving patient management by enabling proper follow-up or treatment and avoiding unnecessary procedures.
format Article
id doaj-art-00a5c061f01c4dffaecf49e4e59e6181
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2165-0497
language English
publishDate 2025-09-01
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-00a5c061f01c4dffaecf49e4e59e61812025-09-02T13:00:57ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyMicrobiology Spectrum2165-04972025-09-0113910.1128/spectrum.00589-25Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screeningShihai Huang0Luciana Girotto Gentil1Colleen Schmidt2Richard Cullum3Yan Zhang4Kevin Nelson5Danijela Lucic6Klara Abravaya7Molecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAAbbott Laboratories de Chile Ltda., Santiago, ChileMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAABSTRACT Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening due to its sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Most of the cervical cancers are caused by HPV16 and HPV18, and their presence has been used to guide patient management. Here, we compared the clinical performance of the Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays in the context of cervical cancer screening. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated with 125 ≥CIN3 (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3) cases and 244 controls (≤CIN1). The genotype agreements between the assays were also evaluated for the case and control groups. The clinical sensitivities were 96.0% for Alinity m and cobas 6800 assays, and 95.2% for cobas 4800 assay. The clinical specificities observed were 67.6%, 68.0%, and 68.4% for Alinity m, cobas 6800, and cobas 4800 assays, respectively. Overall, the three HPV assays demonstrated similar clinical performance. In the ≥CIN3 group, genotype-specific positive agreement was ≥98.4% between Alinity m and cobas 4800 assays, and ≥85.7% between cobas 6800 and cobas 4800 assays. In the ≤CIN1 group, overall positive agreement among the three assays was ≥94.8%. This study showed similar clinical sensitivity and specificity for Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays. Alinity m was more specific in detecting HPV16 and HPV18, which could reduce unnecessary immediate referrals of women to colposcopy.IMPORTANCEThis study provides evidence that the Alinity m HR human papillomavirus (HPV) assay has similar clinical performance in comparison with the cobas 4800 HPV and cobas 6800 HPV, two widely used tests. Validation of HPV assays in a clinical setting is crucial to ensure that they can provide a balanced sensitivity and specificity for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, potentially improving patient management by enabling proper follow-up or treatment and avoiding unnecessary procedures.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00589-25cervical cancerHPV testprimary screeningHPV genotyping
spellingShingle Shihai Huang
Luciana Girotto Gentil
Colleen Schmidt
Richard Cullum
Yan Zhang
Kevin Nelson
Danijela Lucic
Klara Abravaya
Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening
cervical cancer
HPV test
primary screening
HPV genotyping
title Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening
title_full Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening
title_fullStr Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening
title_short Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening
title_sort comparative clinical performance of alinity m hr hpv cobas 4800 hpv and cobas 6800 hpv for cervical cancer screening
topic cervical cancer
HPV test
primary screening
HPV genotyping
url https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00589-25
work_keys_str_mv AT shihaihuang comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening
AT lucianagirottogentil comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening
AT colleenschmidt comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening
AT richardcullum comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening
AT yanzhang comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening
AT kevinnelson comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening
AT danijelalucic comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening
AT klaraabravaya comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening