Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening
ABSTRACT Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening due to its sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Most of the cervical cancers are caused by HPV16 and HPV18, and their presence has been used to guide patient management. Here, we com...
| Published in: | Microbiology Spectrum |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Society for Microbiology
2025-09-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00589-25 |
| _version_ | 1849320551736147968 |
|---|---|
| author | Shihai Huang Luciana Girotto Gentil Colleen Schmidt Richard Cullum Yan Zhang Kevin Nelson Danijela Lucic Klara Abravaya |
| author_facet | Shihai Huang Luciana Girotto Gentil Colleen Schmidt Richard Cullum Yan Zhang Kevin Nelson Danijela Lucic Klara Abravaya |
| author_sort | Shihai Huang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Microbiology Spectrum |
| description | ABSTRACT Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening due to its sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Most of the cervical cancers are caused by HPV16 and HPV18, and their presence has been used to guide patient management. Here, we compared the clinical performance of the Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays in the context of cervical cancer screening. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated with 125 ≥CIN3 (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3) cases and 244 controls (≤CIN1). The genotype agreements between the assays were also evaluated for the case and control groups. The clinical sensitivities were 96.0% for Alinity m and cobas 6800 assays, and 95.2% for cobas 4800 assay. The clinical specificities observed were 67.6%, 68.0%, and 68.4% for Alinity m, cobas 6800, and cobas 4800 assays, respectively. Overall, the three HPV assays demonstrated similar clinical performance. In the ≥CIN3 group, genotype-specific positive agreement was ≥98.4% between Alinity m and cobas 4800 assays, and ≥85.7% between cobas 6800 and cobas 4800 assays. In the ≤CIN1 group, overall positive agreement among the three assays was ≥94.8%. This study showed similar clinical sensitivity and specificity for Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays. Alinity m was more specific in detecting HPV16 and HPV18, which could reduce unnecessary immediate referrals of women to colposcopy.IMPORTANCEThis study provides evidence that the Alinity m HR human papillomavirus (HPV) assay has similar clinical performance in comparison with the cobas 4800 HPV and cobas 6800 HPV, two widely used tests. Validation of HPV assays in a clinical setting is crucial to ensure that they can provide a balanced sensitivity and specificity for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, potentially improving patient management by enabling proper follow-up or treatment and avoiding unnecessary procedures. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-00a5c061f01c4dffaecf49e4e59e6181 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2165-0497 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-09-01 |
| publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-00a5c061f01c4dffaecf49e4e59e61812025-09-02T13:00:57ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyMicrobiology Spectrum2165-04972025-09-0113910.1128/spectrum.00589-25Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screeningShihai Huang0Luciana Girotto Gentil1Colleen Schmidt2Richard Cullum3Yan Zhang4Kevin Nelson5Danijela Lucic6Klara Abravaya7Molecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAAbbott Laboratories de Chile Ltda., Santiago, ChileMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAMolecular Diagnostics of Abbott, Des Plaines, Illinois, USAABSTRACT Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening due to its sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Most of the cervical cancers are caused by HPV16 and HPV18, and their presence has been used to guide patient management. Here, we compared the clinical performance of the Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays in the context of cervical cancer screening. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated with 125 ≥CIN3 (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3) cases and 244 controls (≤CIN1). The genotype agreements between the assays were also evaluated for the case and control groups. The clinical sensitivities were 96.0% for Alinity m and cobas 6800 assays, and 95.2% for cobas 4800 assay. The clinical specificities observed were 67.6%, 68.0%, and 68.4% for Alinity m, cobas 6800, and cobas 4800 assays, respectively. Overall, the three HPV assays demonstrated similar clinical performance. In the ≥CIN3 group, genotype-specific positive agreement was ≥98.4% between Alinity m and cobas 4800 assays, and ≥85.7% between cobas 6800 and cobas 4800 assays. In the ≤CIN1 group, overall positive agreement among the three assays was ≥94.8%. This study showed similar clinical sensitivity and specificity for Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays. Alinity m was more specific in detecting HPV16 and HPV18, which could reduce unnecessary immediate referrals of women to colposcopy.IMPORTANCEThis study provides evidence that the Alinity m HR human papillomavirus (HPV) assay has similar clinical performance in comparison with the cobas 4800 HPV and cobas 6800 HPV, two widely used tests. Validation of HPV assays in a clinical setting is crucial to ensure that they can provide a balanced sensitivity and specificity for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, potentially improving patient management by enabling proper follow-up or treatment and avoiding unnecessary procedures.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00589-25cervical cancerHPV testprimary screeningHPV genotyping |
| spellingShingle | Shihai Huang Luciana Girotto Gentil Colleen Schmidt Richard Cullum Yan Zhang Kevin Nelson Danijela Lucic Klara Abravaya Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening cervical cancer HPV test primary screening HPV genotyping |
| title | Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening |
| title_full | Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening |
| title_fullStr | Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening |
| title_short | Comparative clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV for cervical cancer screening |
| title_sort | comparative clinical performance of alinity m hr hpv cobas 4800 hpv and cobas 6800 hpv for cervical cancer screening |
| topic | cervical cancer HPV test primary screening HPV genotyping |
| url | https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.00589-25 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shihaihuang comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening AT lucianagirottogentil comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening AT colleenschmidt comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening AT richardcullum comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening AT yanzhang comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening AT kevinnelson comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening AT danijelalucic comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening AT klaraabravaya comparativeclinicalperformanceofalinitymhrhpvcobas4800hpvandcobas6800hpvforcervicalcancerscreening |
