The relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the Serbian trademark legislation

This paper analyzes the quality of certain legal procedures applied in domestic trademark legislation in the light of harmonizing our legislation with those of the EU. Trademark Law in the Republic of Serbia (2009) does not rely on opposition proceedings as a phase in the process of trademark regist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu
Main Author: Vasić Aleksandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Law, Niš 2014-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0350-8501/2014/0350-85011468727V.pdf
_version_ 1852777775673376768
author Vasić Aleksandra
author_facet Vasić Aleksandra
author_sort Vasić Aleksandra
collection DOAJ
container_title Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu
description This paper analyzes the quality of certain legal procedures applied in domestic trademark legislation in the light of harmonizing our legislation with those of the EU. Trademark Law in the Republic of Serbia (2009) does not rely on opposition proceedings as a phase in the process of trademark registration and a tool that would ensure that only those trademarks that fulfill the necessary conditions are granted legal protection. Intellectual Property Office examines the so-called relative grounds for trademark registration refusal but does so ex officio, thus preventing the holders of trademark rights from benefiting from a relatively inexpensive and effective opposition procedure regarding the registration of a second trademark which violates their previously established rights. In contrast to our trademark laws, EU Council Regulation 207/2009 on Community Trademarks of February 26, 2009 (CTMR -Community trademark regulation) enforces opposition proceedings as the most important phase in the process of trademark registration. European experience shows that opposition proceedings carry significant benefits for the process of trademark application. First of all, they allow the holders of previously established trademark rights to avoid long and costly court proceedings whose purpose is to dispute trademarks that violate the owner's rights. Also, state agencies authorizing in trademark approval no longer need to monitor registered trademarks.
format Article
id doaj-art-01b39ff00a5b48b28050e8d0f610df79
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0350-8501
2560-3116
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Faculty of Law, Niš
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-01b39ff00a5b48b28050e8d0f610df792025-08-19T20:49:18ZengFaculty of Law, NišZbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu0350-85012560-31162014-01-0120146872773710.5937/zrpfni1468727V0350-85011468727VThe relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the Serbian trademark legislationVasić Aleksandra0Univeristy of Niš, Faculty of Law, Niš, SerbiaThis paper analyzes the quality of certain legal procedures applied in domestic trademark legislation in the light of harmonizing our legislation with those of the EU. Trademark Law in the Republic of Serbia (2009) does not rely on opposition proceedings as a phase in the process of trademark registration and a tool that would ensure that only those trademarks that fulfill the necessary conditions are granted legal protection. Intellectual Property Office examines the so-called relative grounds for trademark registration refusal but does so ex officio, thus preventing the holders of trademark rights from benefiting from a relatively inexpensive and effective opposition procedure regarding the registration of a second trademark which violates their previously established rights. In contrast to our trademark laws, EU Council Regulation 207/2009 on Community Trademarks of February 26, 2009 (CTMR -Community trademark regulation) enforces opposition proceedings as the most important phase in the process of trademark registration. European experience shows that opposition proceedings carry significant benefits for the process of trademark application. First of all, they allow the holders of previously established trademark rights to avoid long and costly court proceedings whose purpose is to dispute trademarks that violate the owner's rights. Also, state agencies authorizing in trademark approval no longer need to monitor registered trademarks.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0350-8501/2014/0350-85011468727V.pdfopposition proceedingsCommunity trademarktrademark lawSerbia
spellingShingle Vasić Aleksandra
The relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the Serbian trademark legislation
opposition proceedings
Community trademark
trademark law
Serbia
title The relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the Serbian trademark legislation
title_full The relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the Serbian trademark legislation
title_fullStr The relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the Serbian trademark legislation
title_full_unstemmed The relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the Serbian trademark legislation
title_short The relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the Serbian trademark legislation
title_sort relevance of introducing opposition proceedings into the serbian trademark legislation
topic opposition proceedings
Community trademark
trademark law
Serbia
url http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0350-8501/2014/0350-85011468727V.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vasicaleksandra therelevanceofintroducingoppositionproceedingsintotheserbiantrademarklegislation
AT vasicaleksandra relevanceofintroducingoppositionproceedingsintotheserbiantrademarklegislation