The Contact Allergen NiSO4 Triggers a Distinct Molecular Response in Primary Human Dendritic Cells Compared to Bacterial LPS

Dendritic cells (DC) play a central role in the pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), the most prevalent form of immunotoxicity in humans. However, knowledge on allergy-induced DC maturation is still limited and proteomic studies, allowing to unravel molecular effects of allergens, rema...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Immunology
Main Authors: Tessa Höper, Katherina Siewert, Verónica I. Dumit, Martin von Bergen, Kristin Schubert, Andrea Haase
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.644700/full
_version_ 1852723791948414976
author Tessa Höper
Tessa Höper
Katherina Siewert
Verónica I. Dumit
Martin von Bergen
Martin von Bergen
Kristin Schubert
Andrea Haase
author_facet Tessa Höper
Tessa Höper
Katherina Siewert
Verónica I. Dumit
Martin von Bergen
Martin von Bergen
Kristin Schubert
Andrea Haase
author_sort Tessa Höper
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Immunology
description Dendritic cells (DC) play a central role in the pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), the most prevalent form of immunotoxicity in humans. However, knowledge on allergy-induced DC maturation is still limited and proteomic studies, allowing to unravel molecular effects of allergens, remain scarce. Therefore, we conducted a global proteomic analysis of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MoDC) treated with NiSO4, the most prominent cause of ACD and compared proteomic alterations induced by NiSO4 to the bacterial trigger lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Both substances possess a similar toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 binding capacity, allowing to identify allergy-specific effects compared to bacterial activation. MoDCs treated for 24 h with 2.5 μg/ml LPS displayed a robust immunological response, characterized by upregulation of DC activation markers, secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and stimulation of T cell proliferation. Similar immunological reactions were observed after treatment with 400 μM NiSO4 but less pronounced. Both substances triggered TLR4 and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM) 1 signaling. However, NiSO4 also activated hypoxic and apoptotic pathways, which might have overshadowed initial signaling. Moreover, our proteomic data support the importance of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) as a key player in sensitization since many Nrf2 targets genes were strongly upregulated on protein and gene level selectively after treatment with NiSO4. Strikingly, NiSO4 stimulation induced cellular cholesterol depletion which was counteracted by the induction of genes and proteins relevant for cholesterol biosynthesis. Our proteomic study allowed for the first time to better characterize some of the fundamental differences between NiSO4 and LPS-triggered activation of MoDCs, providing an essential contribution to the molecular understanding of contact allergy.
format Article
id doaj-art-055ee53ea63e4582a60a95849c6f0cbb
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-3224
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-055ee53ea63e4582a60a95849c6f0cbb2025-08-19T21:11:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242021-03-011210.3389/fimmu.2021.644700644700The Contact Allergen NiSO4 Triggers a Distinct Molecular Response in Primary Human Dendritic Cells Compared to Bacterial LPSTessa Höper0Tessa Höper1Katherina Siewert2Verónica I. Dumit3Martin von Bergen4Martin von Bergen5Kristin Schubert6Andrea Haase7Department of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Molecular Systems Biology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, GermanyInstitute of Biochemistry, Leipzig University, Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Molecular Systems Biology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, GermanyDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, GermanyDendritic cells (DC) play a central role in the pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), the most prevalent form of immunotoxicity in humans. However, knowledge on allergy-induced DC maturation is still limited and proteomic studies, allowing to unravel molecular effects of allergens, remain scarce. Therefore, we conducted a global proteomic analysis of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MoDC) treated with NiSO4, the most prominent cause of ACD and compared proteomic alterations induced by NiSO4 to the bacterial trigger lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Both substances possess a similar toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 binding capacity, allowing to identify allergy-specific effects compared to bacterial activation. MoDCs treated for 24 h with 2.5 μg/ml LPS displayed a robust immunological response, characterized by upregulation of DC activation markers, secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and stimulation of T cell proliferation. Similar immunological reactions were observed after treatment with 400 μM NiSO4 but less pronounced. Both substances triggered TLR4 and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM) 1 signaling. However, NiSO4 also activated hypoxic and apoptotic pathways, which might have overshadowed initial signaling. Moreover, our proteomic data support the importance of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) as a key player in sensitization since many Nrf2 targets genes were strongly upregulated on protein and gene level selectively after treatment with NiSO4. Strikingly, NiSO4 stimulation induced cellular cholesterol depletion which was counteracted by the induction of genes and proteins relevant for cholesterol biosynthesis. Our proteomic study allowed for the first time to better characterize some of the fundamental differences between NiSO4 and LPS-triggered activation of MoDCs, providing an essential contribution to the molecular understanding of contact allergy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.644700/fullmonocyte-derived dendritic cellsallergic contact dermatitisproteomicsnickelLPS
spellingShingle Tessa Höper
Tessa Höper
Katherina Siewert
Verónica I. Dumit
Martin von Bergen
Martin von Bergen
Kristin Schubert
Andrea Haase
The Contact Allergen NiSO4 Triggers a Distinct Molecular Response in Primary Human Dendritic Cells Compared to Bacterial LPS
monocyte-derived dendritic cells
allergic contact dermatitis
proteomics
nickel
LPS
title The Contact Allergen NiSO4 Triggers a Distinct Molecular Response in Primary Human Dendritic Cells Compared to Bacterial LPS
title_full The Contact Allergen NiSO4 Triggers a Distinct Molecular Response in Primary Human Dendritic Cells Compared to Bacterial LPS
title_fullStr The Contact Allergen NiSO4 Triggers a Distinct Molecular Response in Primary Human Dendritic Cells Compared to Bacterial LPS
title_full_unstemmed The Contact Allergen NiSO4 Triggers a Distinct Molecular Response in Primary Human Dendritic Cells Compared to Bacterial LPS
title_short The Contact Allergen NiSO4 Triggers a Distinct Molecular Response in Primary Human Dendritic Cells Compared to Bacterial LPS
title_sort contact allergen niso4 triggers a distinct molecular response in primary human dendritic cells compared to bacterial lps
topic monocyte-derived dendritic cells
allergic contact dermatitis
proteomics
nickel
LPS
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.644700/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tessahoper thecontactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT tessahoper thecontactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT katherinasiewert thecontactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT veronicaidumit thecontactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT martinvonbergen thecontactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT martinvonbergen thecontactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT kristinschubert thecontactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT andreahaase thecontactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT tessahoper contactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT tessahoper contactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT katherinasiewert contactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT veronicaidumit contactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT martinvonbergen contactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT martinvonbergen contactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT kristinschubert contactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps
AT andreahaase contactallergenniso4triggersadistinctmolecularresponseinprimaryhumandendriticcellscomparedtobacteriallps