Neonatal resuscitation practices in Italy: a survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)

Abstract Background Providing appropriate care at birth remains a crucial strategy for reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the consistency of practice and the adherence to the international guidelines on neonatal resuscitation in level-I and level-II Italian birth hospita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Italian Journal of Pediatrics
Main Authors: Camilla Gizzi, Daniele Trevisanuto, Luigi Gagliardi, Giulia Vertecchi, Stefano Ghirardello, Sandra Di Fabio, Corrado Moretti, Fabio Mosca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-022-01260-3
_version_ 1851909257101836288
author Camilla Gizzi
Daniele Trevisanuto
Luigi Gagliardi
Giulia Vertecchi
Stefano Ghirardello
Sandra Di Fabio
Corrado Moretti
Fabio Mosca
author_facet Camilla Gizzi
Daniele Trevisanuto
Luigi Gagliardi
Giulia Vertecchi
Stefano Ghirardello
Sandra Di Fabio
Corrado Moretti
Fabio Mosca
author_sort Camilla Gizzi
collection DOAJ
container_title Italian Journal of Pediatrics
description Abstract Background Providing appropriate care at birth remains a crucial strategy for reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the consistency of practice and the adherence to the international guidelines on neonatal resuscitation in level-I and level-II Italian birth hospitals. Methods This was a cross-sectional electronic survey. A 91-item questionnaire focusing on current delivery room practices in neonatal resuscitation was sent to the directors of 418 Italian neonatal facilities. Results The response rate was 61.7% (258/418), comprising 95.6% (110/115) from level-II and 49.0% (148/303) from level-I centres. In 2018, approximately 300,000 births occurred at the participating hospitals, with a median of 1664 births/centre in level-II and 737 births/centre in level-I hospitals. Participating level-II hospitals provided nasal-CPAP and/or high-flow nasal cannulae (100%), mechanical ventilation (99.1%), HFOV (71.0%), inhaled nitric oxide (80.0%), therapeutic hypothermia (76.4%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ECMO (8.2%). Nasal-CPAP and/or high-flow nasal cannulae and mechanical ventilation were available in 77.7 and 21.6% of the level-I centres, respectively. Multidisciplinary antenatal counselling was routinely offered to parents at 90.0% (90) of level-II hospitals, and 57.4% (85) of level-I hospitals (p < 0.001). Laryngeal masks were available in more than 90% of participating hospitals while an end-tidal CO2 detector was available in only 20%. Significant differences between level-II and level-I centres were found in the composition of resuscitation teams for high-risk deliveries, team briefings before resuscitation, providers qualified with full resuscitation skills, self-confidence, and use of sodium bicarbonate. Conclusions This survey provides insight into neonatal resuscitation practices in a large sample of Italian hospitals. Overall, adherence to international guidelines on neonatal resuscitation was high, but differences in practice between the participating centres and the guidelines exist. Clinicians and stakeholders should consider this information when allocating resources and planning perinatal programs in Italy.
format Article
id doaj-art-080aa58a4cce4935aba13dc00a35d1bf
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1824-7288
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-080aa58a4cce4935aba13dc00a35d1bf2025-08-19T22:02:37ZengBMCItalian Journal of Pediatrics1824-72882022-06-014811910.1186/s13052-022-01260-3Neonatal resuscitation practices in Italy: a survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)Camilla Gizzi0Daniele Trevisanuto1Luigi Gagliardi2Giulia Vertecchi3Stefano Ghirardello4Sandra Di Fabio5Corrado Moretti6Fabio Mosca7Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Ospedale Sandro PertiniDepartment of Woman’s and Child’s Health, University of PadovaDepartment of Neonatology and Pediatrics, Ospedale Versilia, Viareggio; Azienda USL Toscana Nord OvestUnion of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San MatteoDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale San SalvatoreUnion of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoAbstract Background Providing appropriate care at birth remains a crucial strategy for reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the consistency of practice and the adherence to the international guidelines on neonatal resuscitation in level-I and level-II Italian birth hospitals. Methods This was a cross-sectional electronic survey. A 91-item questionnaire focusing on current delivery room practices in neonatal resuscitation was sent to the directors of 418 Italian neonatal facilities. Results The response rate was 61.7% (258/418), comprising 95.6% (110/115) from level-II and 49.0% (148/303) from level-I centres. In 2018, approximately 300,000 births occurred at the participating hospitals, with a median of 1664 births/centre in level-II and 737 births/centre in level-I hospitals. Participating level-II hospitals provided nasal-CPAP and/or high-flow nasal cannulae (100%), mechanical ventilation (99.1%), HFOV (71.0%), inhaled nitric oxide (80.0%), therapeutic hypothermia (76.4%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ECMO (8.2%). Nasal-CPAP and/or high-flow nasal cannulae and mechanical ventilation were available in 77.7 and 21.6% of the level-I centres, respectively. Multidisciplinary antenatal counselling was routinely offered to parents at 90.0% (90) of level-II hospitals, and 57.4% (85) of level-I hospitals (p < 0.001). Laryngeal masks were available in more than 90% of participating hospitals while an end-tidal CO2 detector was available in only 20%. Significant differences between level-II and level-I centres were found in the composition of resuscitation teams for high-risk deliveries, team briefings before resuscitation, providers qualified with full resuscitation skills, self-confidence, and use of sodium bicarbonate. Conclusions This survey provides insight into neonatal resuscitation practices in a large sample of Italian hospitals. Overall, adherence to international guidelines on neonatal resuscitation was high, but differences in practice between the participating centres and the guidelines exist. Clinicians and stakeholders should consider this information when allocating resources and planning perinatal programs in Italy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-022-01260-3ItalyDelivery roomNeonatal resuscitationSurvey
spellingShingle Camilla Gizzi
Daniele Trevisanuto
Luigi Gagliardi
Giulia Vertecchi
Stefano Ghirardello
Sandra Di Fabio
Corrado Moretti
Fabio Mosca
Neonatal resuscitation practices in Italy: a survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)
Italy
Delivery room
Neonatal resuscitation
Survey
title Neonatal resuscitation practices in Italy: a survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)
title_full Neonatal resuscitation practices in Italy: a survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)
title_fullStr Neonatal resuscitation practices in Italy: a survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal resuscitation practices in Italy: a survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)
title_short Neonatal resuscitation practices in Italy: a survey of the Italian Society of Neonatology (SIN) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS)
title_sort neonatal resuscitation practices in italy a survey of the italian society of neonatology sin and the union of european neonatal and perinatal societies uenps
topic Italy
Delivery room
Neonatal resuscitation
Survey
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-022-01260-3
work_keys_str_mv AT camillagizzi neonatalresuscitationpracticesinitalyasurveyoftheitaliansocietyofneonatologysinandtheunionofeuropeanneonatalandperinatalsocietiesuenps
AT danieletrevisanuto neonatalresuscitationpracticesinitalyasurveyoftheitaliansocietyofneonatologysinandtheunionofeuropeanneonatalandperinatalsocietiesuenps
AT luigigagliardi neonatalresuscitationpracticesinitalyasurveyoftheitaliansocietyofneonatologysinandtheunionofeuropeanneonatalandperinatalsocietiesuenps
AT giuliavertecchi neonatalresuscitationpracticesinitalyasurveyoftheitaliansocietyofneonatologysinandtheunionofeuropeanneonatalandperinatalsocietiesuenps
AT stefanoghirardello neonatalresuscitationpracticesinitalyasurveyoftheitaliansocietyofneonatologysinandtheunionofeuropeanneonatalandperinatalsocietiesuenps
AT sandradifabio neonatalresuscitationpracticesinitalyasurveyoftheitaliansocietyofneonatologysinandtheunionofeuropeanneonatalandperinatalsocietiesuenps
AT corradomoretti neonatalresuscitationpracticesinitalyasurveyoftheitaliansocietyofneonatologysinandtheunionofeuropeanneonatalandperinatalsocietiesuenps
AT fabiomosca neonatalresuscitationpracticesinitalyasurveyoftheitaliansocietyofneonatologysinandtheunionofeuropeanneonatalandperinatalsocietiesuenps