Constitutional justiciary (procedural) rights: towards identifying and understanding the phenomenon

Subject. The article is devoted to the study of the existence of an independent group of human rights – human rights in the sphere of justice, also called constitutional justiciary rights. These rights are enshrined in the constitutional acts of modern states and guaranteed at the international lega...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Правоприменение
第一著者: T. V. Sokolov
フォーマット: 論文
言語:ロシア語
出版事項: Dostoevsky Omsk State University 2024-12-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/1004
_version_ 1849508680722022400
author T. V. Sokolov
author_facet T. V. Sokolov
author_sort T. V. Sokolov
collection DOAJ
container_title Правоприменение
description Subject. The article is devoted to the study of the existence of an independent group of human rights – human rights in the sphere of justice, also called constitutional justiciary rights. These rights are enshrined in the constitutional acts of modern states and guaranteed at the international legal level in a number of universal instruments and regional conventions on the protection of human rights. The consolidation and implementation of these rights is intended to ensure, with the help of judicial procedures, the reality of the constitutionalism regime and social justice in specific cases considered by the courts.Purpose of the study. The article aims to prove the existence of constitutional judicial rights as a category of current law.Methodology. The article relies on the wide application of comparative legal, historical legal and formal dogmatic methods. The historical legal method made it possible to trace the consolidation of judicial rights in the constitutions of England, the USA, France, Italy and Germany in the 18th-19th centuries. Using the comparative legal method, the constitutions of the modern world were studied and a quantitative rating of the prevalence of these rights was compiled. The formal dogmatic method made it possible to define approaches to the theoretical study of this group of human rights.Conclusions. An independent group of human rights – justiciary rights – exists and is subject to allocation (recognition) as part of the general legal status of an individual. Such rights is defined as human rights realized in the field of justice.
format Article
id doaj-art-080d189801494c819d9851d2aa83b5e2
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2542-1514
2658-4050
language Russian
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Dostoevsky Omsk State University
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-080d189801494c819d9851d2aa83b5e22025-08-20T02:59:11ZrusDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityПравоприменение2542-15142658-40502024-12-0184738210.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(4).73-82555Constitutional justiciary (procedural) rights: towards identifying and understanding the phenomenonT. V. Sokolov0HSE UniversitySubject. The article is devoted to the study of the existence of an independent group of human rights – human rights in the sphere of justice, also called constitutional justiciary rights. These rights are enshrined in the constitutional acts of modern states and guaranteed at the international legal level in a number of universal instruments and regional conventions on the protection of human rights. The consolidation and implementation of these rights is intended to ensure, with the help of judicial procedures, the reality of the constitutionalism regime and social justice in specific cases considered by the courts.Purpose of the study. The article aims to prove the existence of constitutional judicial rights as a category of current law.Methodology. The article relies on the wide application of comparative legal, historical legal and formal dogmatic methods. The historical legal method made it possible to trace the consolidation of judicial rights in the constitutions of England, the USA, France, Italy and Germany in the 18th-19th centuries. Using the comparative legal method, the constitutions of the modern world were studied and a quantitative rating of the prevalence of these rights was compiled. The formal dogmatic method made it possible to define approaches to the theoretical study of this group of human rights.Conclusions. An independent group of human rights – justiciary rights – exists and is subject to allocation (recognition) as part of the general legal status of an individual. Such rights is defined as human rights realized in the field of justice.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/1004human rightsjusticejudicial powerjudicial lawjudicial rightsconstitutioninternational treatyarchetype
spellingShingle T. V. Sokolov
Constitutional justiciary (procedural) rights: towards identifying and understanding the phenomenon
human rights
justice
judicial power
judicial law
judicial rights
constitution
international treaty
archetype
title Constitutional justiciary (procedural) rights: towards identifying and understanding the phenomenon
title_full Constitutional justiciary (procedural) rights: towards identifying and understanding the phenomenon
title_fullStr Constitutional justiciary (procedural) rights: towards identifying and understanding the phenomenon
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional justiciary (procedural) rights: towards identifying and understanding the phenomenon
title_short Constitutional justiciary (procedural) rights: towards identifying and understanding the phenomenon
title_sort constitutional justiciary procedural rights towards identifying and understanding the phenomenon
topic human rights
justice
judicial power
judicial law
judicial rights
constitution
international treaty
archetype
url https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/1004
work_keys_str_mv AT tvsokolov constitutionaljusticiaryproceduralrightstowardsidentifyingandunderstandingthephenomenon