Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Non-responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) represent a high-risk, and difficult to treat population of heart failure patients. Studies have shown that these patients have a lower quality of life and reduced life expectancy compared to those who respond to CRT. Whilst the first-line tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Physiology
Main Authors: Nadeev Wijesuriya, Mark K. Elliott, Vishal Mehta, Felicity De Vere, Marina Strocchi, Jonathan M. Behar, Steven A. Niederer, Christopher A. Rinaldi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1054095/full
_version_ 1852665560992579584
author Nadeev Wijesuriya
Nadeev Wijesuriya
Mark K. Elliott
Mark K. Elliott
Vishal Mehta
Vishal Mehta
Felicity De Vere
Felicity De Vere
Marina Strocchi
Jonathan M. Behar
Jonathan M. Behar
Steven A. Niederer
Christopher A. Rinaldi
Christopher A. Rinaldi
author_facet Nadeev Wijesuriya
Nadeev Wijesuriya
Mark K. Elliott
Mark K. Elliott
Vishal Mehta
Vishal Mehta
Felicity De Vere
Felicity De Vere
Marina Strocchi
Jonathan M. Behar
Jonathan M. Behar
Steven A. Niederer
Christopher A. Rinaldi
Christopher A. Rinaldi
author_sort Nadeev Wijesuriya
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Physiology
description Non-responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) represent a high-risk, and difficult to treat population of heart failure patients. Studies have shown that these patients have a lower quality of life and reduced life expectancy compared to those who respond to CRT. Whilst the first-line treatment for dyssynchronous heart failure is “conventional” biventricular epicardial CRT, a range of novel pacing interventions have emerged as potential alternatives. This has raised the question whether these new treatments may be useful as a second-line pacing intervention for treating non-responders, or indeed, whether some patients may benefit from these as a first-line option. In this review, we will examine the current evidence for four pacing interventions in the context of treatment of conventional CRT non-responders: CRT optimization; multisite left ventricular pacing; left ventricular endocardial pacing and conduction system pacing.
format Article
id doaj-art-0fc9c344c8be4cffbe6c10e2e8f87a97
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-042X
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-0fc9c344c8be4cffbe6c10e2e8f87a972025-08-19T21:35:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2023-01-011410.3389/fphys.2023.10540951054095Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapyNadeev Wijesuriya0Nadeev Wijesuriya1Mark K. Elliott2Mark K. Elliott3Vishal Mehta4Vishal Mehta5Felicity De Vere6Felicity De Vere7Marina Strocchi8Jonathan M. Behar9Jonathan M. Behar10Steven A. Niederer11Christopher A. Rinaldi12Christopher A. Rinaldi13School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United KingdomSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United KingdomSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomNon-responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) represent a high-risk, and difficult to treat population of heart failure patients. Studies have shown that these patients have a lower quality of life and reduced life expectancy compared to those who respond to CRT. Whilst the first-line treatment for dyssynchronous heart failure is “conventional” biventricular epicardial CRT, a range of novel pacing interventions have emerged as potential alternatives. This has raised the question whether these new treatments may be useful as a second-line pacing intervention for treating non-responders, or indeed, whether some patients may benefit from these as a first-line option. In this review, we will examine the current evidence for four pacing interventions in the context of treatment of conventional CRT non-responders: CRT optimization; multisite left ventricular pacing; left ventricular endocardial pacing and conduction system pacing.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1054095/fullCRTCRT non-responseendocardial pacingleadless cardiac resynchronization therapyconduction system pacing
spellingShingle Nadeev Wijesuriya
Nadeev Wijesuriya
Mark K. Elliott
Mark K. Elliott
Vishal Mehta
Vishal Mehta
Felicity De Vere
Felicity De Vere
Marina Strocchi
Jonathan M. Behar
Jonathan M. Behar
Steven A. Niederer
Christopher A. Rinaldi
Christopher A. Rinaldi
Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
CRT
CRT non-response
endocardial pacing
leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy
conduction system pacing
title Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_fullStr Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full_unstemmed Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_short Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_sort pacing interventions in non responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
topic CRT
CRT non-response
endocardial pacing
leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy
conduction system pacing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1054095/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nadeevwijesuriya pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT nadeevwijesuriya pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT markkelliott pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT markkelliott pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT vishalmehta pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT vishalmehta pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT felicitydevere pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT felicitydevere pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT marinastrocchi pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT jonathanmbehar pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT jonathanmbehar pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT stevenaniederer pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT christopherarinaldi pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT christopherarinaldi pacinginterventionsinnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy