A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
Objective The conventional criteria for defining the basilar invagination (BI) focus on the relationship of odontoid tip to basion and opisthion, landmarks that are intrinsically variable especially in presence of occipitalised atlas. A universal single reference line is proposed that helps in unequ...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | Neurospine |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
2021-03-01
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040608-304.pdf |
| _version_ | 1850390664714387456 |
|---|---|
| author | Jayesh Sardhara Sanjay Behari Suyash Singh Arun K. Srivastava Gaurav Chauhan Hira Lal Kuntal K. Das Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora Anant Mehrotra Prabhakar Mishra Awadhesh K. Jaiswal |
| author_facet | Jayesh Sardhara Sanjay Behari Suyash Singh Arun K. Srivastava Gaurav Chauhan Hira Lal Kuntal K. Das Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora Anant Mehrotra Prabhakar Mishra Awadhesh K. Jaiswal |
| author_sort | Jayesh Sardhara |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Neurospine |
| description | Objective The conventional criteria for defining the basilar invagination (BI) focus on the relationship of odontoid tip to basion and opisthion, landmarks that are intrinsically variable especially in presence of occipitalised atlas. A universal single reference line is proposed that helps in unequivocally establishing the diagnosis of BI, may be relevant in establishing both Goel types A and B BI, as well as in differentiating a ‘very high’ from ‘regular’ BI. Methods Study design – case-control study. In 268 patients (group I with BI [n = 89] including Goel type A BI [n = 66], Goel type B BI [n = 23], and group II controls [n = 179]), the perpendicular distance between odontoid tip and line subtended between posterior tip of hard palate-internal occipital protuberance (P-IOP line) was measured. Logistic regression analysis determined factors influencing the proposed parameter (p < 0.05). Results In patients with a ‘very high’ BI (n = 5), the odontoid tip intersected/or was above the P-IOP line. In patients with a ‘regular’ BI (n = 84), the odontoid tip was 6.56 ± 3.9mm below the P-IOP line; while in controls, this distance was 12.53 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.01). In Goel type A BI, the distance was 7.01 ± 3.78 mm and in type B BI, it was 5.07 ± 4.19 mm (p = 0.004). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified 9.0 mm (8.92–9.15 mm) as the cut-point for diagnosing BI using the odontoid tip-P-IOP line distance as reference. Conclusion The odontoid tip either intersecting the P-IOP line (very high BI) or being < 9 mm below the P-IOP line (Goel types A and B BI) is recommended as highly applicable criteria to establish the diagnosis of BI. This parameter may be useful in establishing the diagnosis in all varieties of BI. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-15dbb8cd5aba482cada7da84050de2e4 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2586-6583 2586-6591 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
| publisher | Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-15dbb8cd5aba482cada7da84050de2e42025-08-19T22:53:59ZengKorean Spinal Neurosurgery SocietyNeurospine2586-65832586-65912021-03-0118120621610.14245/ns.2040608.3041118A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar InvaginationJayesh Sardhara0Sanjay Behari1Suyash Singh2Arun K. Srivastava3Gaurav Chauhan4Hira Lal5Kuntal K. Das6Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora7Anant Mehrotra8Prabhakar Mishra9Awadhesh K. Jaiswal10 Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, IndiaObjective The conventional criteria for defining the basilar invagination (BI) focus on the relationship of odontoid tip to basion and opisthion, landmarks that are intrinsically variable especially in presence of occipitalised atlas. A universal single reference line is proposed that helps in unequivocally establishing the diagnosis of BI, may be relevant in establishing both Goel types A and B BI, as well as in differentiating a ‘very high’ from ‘regular’ BI. Methods Study design – case-control study. In 268 patients (group I with BI [n = 89] including Goel type A BI [n = 66], Goel type B BI [n = 23], and group II controls [n = 179]), the perpendicular distance between odontoid tip and line subtended between posterior tip of hard palate-internal occipital protuberance (P-IOP line) was measured. Logistic regression analysis determined factors influencing the proposed parameter (p < 0.05). Results In patients with a ‘very high’ BI (n = 5), the odontoid tip intersected/or was above the P-IOP line. In patients with a ‘regular’ BI (n = 84), the odontoid tip was 6.56 ± 3.9mm below the P-IOP line; while in controls, this distance was 12.53 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.01). In Goel type A BI, the distance was 7.01 ± 3.78 mm and in type B BI, it was 5.07 ± 4.19 mm (p = 0.004). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified 9.0 mm (8.92–9.15 mm) as the cut-point for diagnosing BI using the odontoid tip-P-IOP line distance as reference. Conclusion The odontoid tip either intersecting the P-IOP line (very high BI) or being < 9 mm below the P-IOP line (Goel types A and B BI) is recommended as highly applicable criteria to establish the diagnosis of BI. This parameter may be useful in establishing the diagnosis in all varieties of BI.http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040608-304.pdfbasilar invaginationcraniovertebral junctioncraniometric lineodontoiddiagnosischamberlain line |
| spellingShingle | Jayesh Sardhara Sanjay Behari Suyash Singh Arun K. Srivastava Gaurav Chauhan Hira Lal Kuntal K. Das Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora Anant Mehrotra Prabhakar Mishra Awadhesh K. Jaiswal A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination basilar invagination craniovertebral junction craniometric line odontoid diagnosis chamberlain line |
| title | A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination |
| title_full | A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination |
| title_fullStr | A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination |
| title_short | A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination |
| title_sort | universal craniometric index for establishing the diagnosis of basilar invagination |
| topic | basilar invagination craniovertebral junction craniometric line odontoid diagnosis chamberlain line |
| url | http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040608-304.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jayeshsardhara auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT sanjaybehari auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT suyashsingh auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT arunksrivastava auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT gauravchauhan auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT hiralal auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT kuntalkdas auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT kamleshsinghbhaisora auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT anantmehrotra auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT prabhakarmishra auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT awadheshkjaiswal auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT jayeshsardhara universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT sanjaybehari universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT suyashsingh universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT arunksrivastava universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT gauravchauhan universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT hiralal universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT kuntalkdas universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT kamleshsinghbhaisora universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT anantmehrotra universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT prabhakarmishra universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination AT awadheshkjaiswal universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination |
