A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination

Objective The conventional criteria for defining the basilar invagination (BI) focus on the relationship of odontoid tip to basion and opisthion, landmarks that are intrinsically variable especially in presence of occipitalised atlas. A universal single reference line is proposed that helps in unequ...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Neurospine
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Jayesh Sardhara, Sanjay Behari, Suyash Singh, Arun K. Srivastava, Gaurav Chauhan, Hira Lal, Kuntal K. Das, Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora, Anant Mehrotra, Prabhakar Mishra, Awadhesh K. Jaiswal
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2021-03-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040608-304.pdf
_version_ 1850390664714387456
author Jayesh Sardhara
Sanjay Behari
Suyash Singh
Arun K. Srivastava
Gaurav Chauhan
Hira Lal
Kuntal K. Das
Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora
Anant Mehrotra
Prabhakar Mishra
Awadhesh K. Jaiswal
author_facet Jayesh Sardhara
Sanjay Behari
Suyash Singh
Arun K. Srivastava
Gaurav Chauhan
Hira Lal
Kuntal K. Das
Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora
Anant Mehrotra
Prabhakar Mishra
Awadhesh K. Jaiswal
author_sort Jayesh Sardhara
collection DOAJ
container_title Neurospine
description Objective The conventional criteria for defining the basilar invagination (BI) focus on the relationship of odontoid tip to basion and opisthion, landmarks that are intrinsically variable especially in presence of occipitalised atlas. A universal single reference line is proposed that helps in unequivocally establishing the diagnosis of BI, may be relevant in establishing both Goel types A and B BI, as well as in differentiating a ‘very high’ from ‘regular’ BI. Methods Study design – case-control study. In 268 patients (group I with BI [n = 89] including Goel type A BI [n = 66], Goel type B BI [n = 23], and group II controls [n = 179]), the perpendicular distance between odontoid tip and line subtended between posterior tip of hard palate-internal occipital protuberance (P-IOP line) was measured. Logistic regression analysis determined factors influencing the proposed parameter (p < 0.05). Results In patients with a ‘very high’ BI (n = 5), the odontoid tip intersected/or was above the P-IOP line. In patients with a ‘regular’ BI (n = 84), the odontoid tip was 6.56 ± 3.9mm below the P-IOP line; while in controls, this distance was 12.53 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.01). In Goel type A BI, the distance was 7.01 ± 3.78 mm and in type B BI, it was 5.07 ± 4.19 mm (p = 0.004). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified 9.0 mm (8.92–9.15 mm) as the cut-point for diagnosing BI using the odontoid tip-P-IOP line distance as reference. Conclusion The odontoid tip either intersecting the P-IOP line (very high BI) or being < 9 mm below the P-IOP line (Goel types A and B BI) is recommended as highly applicable criteria to establish the diagnosis of BI. This parameter may be useful in establishing the diagnosis in all varieties of BI.
format Article
id doaj-art-15dbb8cd5aba482cada7da84050de2e4
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2586-6583
2586-6591
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-15dbb8cd5aba482cada7da84050de2e42025-08-19T22:53:59ZengKorean Spinal Neurosurgery SocietyNeurospine2586-65832586-65912021-03-0118120621610.14245/ns.2040608.3041118A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar InvaginationJayesh Sardhara0Sanjay Behari1Suyash Singh2Arun K. Srivastava3Gaurav Chauhan4Hira Lal5Kuntal K. Das6Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora7Anant Mehrotra8Prabhakar Mishra9Awadhesh K. Jaiswal10 Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, IndiaObjective The conventional criteria for defining the basilar invagination (BI) focus on the relationship of odontoid tip to basion and opisthion, landmarks that are intrinsically variable especially in presence of occipitalised atlas. A universal single reference line is proposed that helps in unequivocally establishing the diagnosis of BI, may be relevant in establishing both Goel types A and B BI, as well as in differentiating a ‘very high’ from ‘regular’ BI. Methods Study design – case-control study. In 268 patients (group I with BI [n = 89] including Goel type A BI [n = 66], Goel type B BI [n = 23], and group II controls [n = 179]), the perpendicular distance between odontoid tip and line subtended between posterior tip of hard palate-internal occipital protuberance (P-IOP line) was measured. Logistic regression analysis determined factors influencing the proposed parameter (p < 0.05). Results In patients with a ‘very high’ BI (n = 5), the odontoid tip intersected/or was above the P-IOP line. In patients with a ‘regular’ BI (n = 84), the odontoid tip was 6.56 ± 3.9mm below the P-IOP line; while in controls, this distance was 12.53 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.01). In Goel type A BI, the distance was 7.01 ± 3.78 mm and in type B BI, it was 5.07 ± 4.19 mm (p = 0.004). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified 9.0 mm (8.92–9.15 mm) as the cut-point for diagnosing BI using the odontoid tip-P-IOP line distance as reference. Conclusion The odontoid tip either intersecting the P-IOP line (very high BI) or being < 9 mm below the P-IOP line (Goel types A and B BI) is recommended as highly applicable criteria to establish the diagnosis of BI. This parameter may be useful in establishing the diagnosis in all varieties of BI.http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040608-304.pdfbasilar invaginationcraniovertebral junctioncraniometric lineodontoiddiagnosischamberlain line
spellingShingle Jayesh Sardhara
Sanjay Behari
Suyash Singh
Arun K. Srivastava
Gaurav Chauhan
Hira Lal
Kuntal K. Das
Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora
Anant Mehrotra
Prabhakar Mishra
Awadhesh K. Jaiswal
A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
basilar invagination
craniovertebral junction
craniometric line
odontoid
diagnosis
chamberlain line
title A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
title_full A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
title_fullStr A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
title_full_unstemmed A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
title_short A Universal Craniometric Index for Establishing the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination
title_sort universal craniometric index for establishing the diagnosis of basilar invagination
topic basilar invagination
craniovertebral junction
craniometric line
odontoid
diagnosis
chamberlain line
url http://www.e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2040608-304.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jayeshsardhara auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT sanjaybehari auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT suyashsingh auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT arunksrivastava auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT gauravchauhan auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT hiralal auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT kuntalkdas auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT kamleshsinghbhaisora auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT anantmehrotra auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT prabhakarmishra auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT awadheshkjaiswal auniversalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT jayeshsardhara universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT sanjaybehari universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT suyashsingh universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT arunksrivastava universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT gauravchauhan universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT hiralal universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT kuntalkdas universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT kamleshsinghbhaisora universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT anantmehrotra universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT prabhakarmishra universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination
AT awadheshkjaiswal universalcraniometricindexforestablishingthediagnosisofbasilarinvagination