Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #Metoo

From critiques of baked-in sexism in data science, to the use of data in the service of feminism, feminist data activism has emerged as a new form of feminist activism. This paper approaches feminist data activism from a data imaginary perspective, focusing on a prominent feminist initiative from Au...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Big Data & Society
Main Author: Trang Le
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-12-01
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241306347
_version_ 1849525884960112640
author Trang Le
author_facet Trang Le
author_sort Trang Le
collection DOAJ
container_title Big Data & Society
description From critiques of baked-in sexism in data science, to the use of data in the service of feminism, feminist data activism has emerged as a new form of feminist activism. This paper approaches feminist data activism from a data imaginary perspective, focusing on a prominent feminist initiative from Australia called She's A Crowd , an organization that claims to have crowdsourced the world's largest dataset of gendered violence. Through interviews with 11 participants who volunteered their “datafied stories” to the organization, I explore the grassroots imaginaries about what data is and what it can do for the collective struggle against gendered violence. I show that participants’ experiences with not being believed led them to see data-driven stories as having superior epistemic value over qualitative narratives. Paradoxically, even when data is viewed as superior due to its detachment from the personal, concerns about its authenticity and quality persist. Consequently, participants advocated for increased data collection as the ultimate solution to address these limitations. Thus, if the imaginary of a binary between “data” and “stories” privileges data as a superior epistemic solution, the imaginary of limitation reinforces more data collection as the only solution imaginable. I argue that at stake is how these imaginaries locate the legitimacy of marginalized experiences within the dataset, obscuring how data collected from the grassroots might circulate within and be interpreted by hegemonic knowledge practices. This paper opens a conversation about feminist data activism and the power relations it is enmeshed within, an area that remains under explored.
format Article
id doaj-art-1663755984a848e2a9bc668645a2312f
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2053-9517
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-1663755984a848e2a9bc668645a2312f2025-08-20T02:50:47ZengSAGE PublishingBig Data & Society2053-95172024-12-011110.1177/20539517241306347Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #MetooTrang LeFrom critiques of baked-in sexism in data science, to the use of data in the service of feminism, feminist data activism has emerged as a new form of feminist activism. This paper approaches feminist data activism from a data imaginary perspective, focusing on a prominent feminist initiative from Australia called She's A Crowd , an organization that claims to have crowdsourced the world's largest dataset of gendered violence. Through interviews with 11 participants who volunteered their “datafied stories” to the organization, I explore the grassroots imaginaries about what data is and what it can do for the collective struggle against gendered violence. I show that participants’ experiences with not being believed led them to see data-driven stories as having superior epistemic value over qualitative narratives. Paradoxically, even when data is viewed as superior due to its detachment from the personal, concerns about its authenticity and quality persist. Consequently, participants advocated for increased data collection as the ultimate solution to address these limitations. Thus, if the imaginary of a binary between “data” and “stories” privileges data as a superior epistemic solution, the imaginary of limitation reinforces more data collection as the only solution imaginable. I argue that at stake is how these imaginaries locate the legitimacy of marginalized experiences within the dataset, obscuring how data collected from the grassroots might circulate within and be interpreted by hegemonic knowledge practices. This paper opens a conversation about feminist data activism and the power relations it is enmeshed within, an area that remains under explored.https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241306347
spellingShingle Trang Le
Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #Metoo
title Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #Metoo
title_full Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #Metoo
title_fullStr Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #Metoo
title_full_unstemmed Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #Metoo
title_short Data, anecdotes, anecdotal data: Feminist data activism against gendered violence post #Metoo
title_sort data anecdotes anecdotal data feminist data activism against gendered violence post metoo
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241306347
work_keys_str_mv AT trangle dataanecdotesanecdotaldatafeministdataactivismagainstgenderedviolencepostmetoo