Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium

Abstract Background The Belgian Reference Laboratory for Plasmodium offers a free-of-charge reference testing of malaria-positive or doubtful samples to clinical laboratories. Methods The final malaria diagnosis from the Reference Laboratory (microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and Plasmodium...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Laura Loomans, Anali Conesa Botella, Agnes D’hondt, Jacob Verschueren, Dorien Van den Bossche, Marjan Van Esbroeck, Jan Jacobs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-019-2731-0
_version_ 1856958165973729280
author Laura Loomans
Anali Conesa Botella
Agnes D’hondt
Jacob Verschueren
Dorien Van den Bossche
Marjan Van Esbroeck
Jan Jacobs
author_facet Laura Loomans
Anali Conesa Botella
Agnes D’hondt
Jacob Verschueren
Dorien Van den Bossche
Marjan Van Esbroeck
Jan Jacobs
author_sort Laura Loomans
collection DOAJ
container_title Malaria Journal
description Abstract Background The Belgian Reference Laboratory for Plasmodium offers a free-of-charge reference testing of malaria-positive or doubtful samples to clinical laboratories. Methods The final malaria diagnosis from the Reference Laboratory (microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and Plasmodium species-specific PCR) were compared with the final diagnosis from peripheral Belgian laboratories. The Reference Laboratory reports were analysed for all samples submitted between 2013 and 2017. Criteria assessed included the diagnosis of malaria, Plasmodium species identification including mixed infections, and in case of Plasmodium falciparum, the parasite density and the presence of sexual and asexual stages. Results A total of 947 non-duplicate samples were included. Reference testing confirmed 96.3% (893/927) and 90.0% (18/20) samples submitted as positive and negative, respectively, the two missed diagnoses were samples with Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae. Submitting laboratories had correctly identified P. falciparum in 95.1% (508/534) samples with P. falciparum single infection. They had correctly diagnosed the species in 62.9% (95/151) single non-falciparum samples and had reported ‘non-falciparum’ in another 26 (17.2%) samples; most errors occurred among P. malariae (n = 8/21, 38.1%) and P. ovale (n = 14/51, 27.5%). Only one of the 21 mixed Plasmodium species infections had been diagnosed as such by the submitting laboratories; in three of them, P. falciparum had been overlooked. Taken single and mixed infections together, P. falciparum was diagnosed in 98.6% (546/554) samples. Among 471 single P. falciparum samples available for comparison, laboratories had correctly reported parasite densities above 2% in 87.5% (70/80) samples; they had incorrectly reported parasite densities > 2% in an extra 52 (8.9%) samples. Laboratories had correctly reported P. falciparum schizonts and gametocytes in 25.6% (11/43) and 56.7% (17/30) samples, respectively. Conclusion Diagnostic laboratories in a malaria non-endemic setting provided excellent diagnosis of malaria and P. falciparum, reasonably good diagnosis of non-falciparum infections and acceptable calculation of P. falciparum parasite density.
format Article
id doaj-art-1ced14ce2b0c4daabe2a34bb23657f8a
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1475-2875
language English
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-1ced14ce2b0c4daabe2a34bb23657f8a2025-08-19T20:04:37ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752019-03-011811710.1186/s12936-019-2731-0Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in BelgiumLaura Loomans0Anali Conesa Botella1Agnes D’hondt2Jacob Verschueren3Dorien Van den Bossche4Marjan Van Esbroeck5Jan Jacobs6Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical MedicineAbstract Background The Belgian Reference Laboratory for Plasmodium offers a free-of-charge reference testing of malaria-positive or doubtful samples to clinical laboratories. Methods The final malaria diagnosis from the Reference Laboratory (microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and Plasmodium species-specific PCR) were compared with the final diagnosis from peripheral Belgian laboratories. The Reference Laboratory reports were analysed for all samples submitted between 2013 and 2017. Criteria assessed included the diagnosis of malaria, Plasmodium species identification including mixed infections, and in case of Plasmodium falciparum, the parasite density and the presence of sexual and asexual stages. Results A total of 947 non-duplicate samples were included. Reference testing confirmed 96.3% (893/927) and 90.0% (18/20) samples submitted as positive and negative, respectively, the two missed diagnoses were samples with Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae. Submitting laboratories had correctly identified P. falciparum in 95.1% (508/534) samples with P. falciparum single infection. They had correctly diagnosed the species in 62.9% (95/151) single non-falciparum samples and had reported ‘non-falciparum’ in another 26 (17.2%) samples; most errors occurred among P. malariae (n = 8/21, 38.1%) and P. ovale (n = 14/51, 27.5%). Only one of the 21 mixed Plasmodium species infections had been diagnosed as such by the submitting laboratories; in three of them, P. falciparum had been overlooked. Taken single and mixed infections together, P. falciparum was diagnosed in 98.6% (546/554) samples. Among 471 single P. falciparum samples available for comparison, laboratories had correctly reported parasite densities above 2% in 87.5% (70/80) samples; they had incorrectly reported parasite densities > 2% in an extra 52 (8.9%) samples. Laboratories had correctly reported P. falciparum schizonts and gametocytes in 25.6% (11/43) and 56.7% (17/30) samples, respectively. Conclusion Diagnostic laboratories in a malaria non-endemic setting provided excellent diagnosis of malaria and P. falciparum, reasonably good diagnosis of non-falciparum infections and acceptable calculation of P. falciparum parasite density.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-019-2731-0MalariaDiagnostic performanceBelgium
spellingShingle Laura Loomans
Anali Conesa Botella
Agnes D’hondt
Jacob Verschueren
Dorien Van den Bossche
Marjan Van Esbroeck
Jan Jacobs
Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
Malaria
Diagnostic performance
Belgium
title Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_full Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_fullStr Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_short Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_sort accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in belgium
topic Malaria
Diagnostic performance
Belgium
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-019-2731-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraloomans accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT analiconesabotella accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT agnesdhondt accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT jacobverschueren accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT dorienvandenbossche accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT marjanvanesbroeck accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT janjacobs accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium