Effect of Sucrose and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Protein Fractions of Two Typical Woody Forage Silages

Paper mulberry (PM) and mulberry (MU) have been considered potential substitutes for traditional forages in response to the increasing demand for high-protein feed for livestock. To improve the utility of these two typical woody forages, our study investigated the effects of sucrose and lactic acid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agriculture
Main Authors: Xuekai Wang, Han Liu, Yixiao Xie, Yingchao Zhang, Yanli Lin, Yulong Zheng, Xueping Yang, Ningwei Wang, Kuikui Ni, Fuyu Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/3/256
_version_ 1850534356883341312
author Xuekai Wang
Han Liu
Yixiao Xie
Yingchao Zhang
Yanli Lin
Yulong Zheng
Xueping Yang
Ningwei Wang
Kuikui Ni
Fuyu Yang
author_facet Xuekai Wang
Han Liu
Yixiao Xie
Yingchao Zhang
Yanli Lin
Yulong Zheng
Xueping Yang
Ningwei Wang
Kuikui Ni
Fuyu Yang
author_sort Xuekai Wang
collection DOAJ
container_title Agriculture
description Paper mulberry (PM) and mulberry (MU) have been considered potential substitutes for traditional forages in response to the increasing demand for high-protein feed for livestock. To improve the utility of these two typical woody forages, our study investigated the effects of sucrose and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) additives on the fermentation quality, nutritive value, and protein fractions of their leaf silages. Collected leaves were separately subjected to ensiling treatments, either with or without sucrose (S), in combination with <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i> (LP), or <i>Lactobacillus casei</i> (LC). The silage was sampled and analyzed for fermentation parameters, carbohydrates, and protein fractions after ensiling for 60 days. The pH value of paper mulberry silages with S was 19% lower than that without S, while LAB-treated mulberry silages showed decreased ammonia nitrogen (by 71%) and fraction A in crude protein (by 15%) compared with no LAB additives. In summary, adding S improved the fermentation quality, with no positive effect on protein fractions, in PM silage, whereas LAB additives improved the potential utilization of protein in MU silage.
format Article
id doaj-art-1eb2dfce53eb4b00a72066178375acb4
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2077-0472
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-1eb2dfce53eb4b00a72066178375acb42025-08-19T22:38:46ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722021-03-0111325610.3390/agriculture11030256Effect of Sucrose and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Protein Fractions of Two Typical Woody Forage SilagesXuekai Wang0Han Liu1Yixiao Xie2Yingchao Zhang3Yanli Lin4Yulong Zheng5Xueping Yang6Ningwei Wang7Kuikui Ni8Fuyu Yang9College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, ChinaCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, ChinaCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, ChinaCollege of Life Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, ChinaCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, ChinaDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health (MAPS), University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, ItalyCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, ChinaCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, ChinaCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, ChinaPaper mulberry (PM) and mulberry (MU) have been considered potential substitutes for traditional forages in response to the increasing demand for high-protein feed for livestock. To improve the utility of these two typical woody forages, our study investigated the effects of sucrose and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) additives on the fermentation quality, nutritive value, and protein fractions of their leaf silages. Collected leaves were separately subjected to ensiling treatments, either with or without sucrose (S), in combination with <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i> (LP), or <i>Lactobacillus casei</i> (LC). The silage was sampled and analyzed for fermentation parameters, carbohydrates, and protein fractions after ensiling for 60 days. The pH value of paper mulberry silages with S was 19% lower than that without S, while LAB-treated mulberry silages showed decreased ammonia nitrogen (by 71%) and fraction A in crude protein (by 15%) compared with no LAB additives. In summary, adding S improved the fermentation quality, with no positive effect on protein fractions, in PM silage, whereas LAB additives improved the potential utilization of protein in MU silage.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/3/256woody foragemulberrypaper mulberrysilage additiveCNCPS
spellingShingle Xuekai Wang
Han Liu
Yixiao Xie
Yingchao Zhang
Yanli Lin
Yulong Zheng
Xueping Yang
Ningwei Wang
Kuikui Ni
Fuyu Yang
Effect of Sucrose and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Protein Fractions of Two Typical Woody Forage Silages
woody forage
mulberry
paper mulberry
silage additive
CNCPS
title Effect of Sucrose and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Protein Fractions of Two Typical Woody Forage Silages
title_full Effect of Sucrose and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Protein Fractions of Two Typical Woody Forage Silages
title_fullStr Effect of Sucrose and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Protein Fractions of Two Typical Woody Forage Silages
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Sucrose and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Protein Fractions of Two Typical Woody Forage Silages
title_short Effect of Sucrose and Lactic Acid Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition and Protein Fractions of Two Typical Woody Forage Silages
title_sort effect of sucrose and lactic acid bacteria additives on fermentation quality chemical composition and protein fractions of two typical woody forage silages
topic woody forage
mulberry
paper mulberry
silage additive
CNCPS
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/3/256
work_keys_str_mv AT xuekaiwang effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT hanliu effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT yixiaoxie effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT yingchaozhang effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT yanlilin effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT yulongzheng effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT xuepingyang effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT ningweiwang effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT kuikuini effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages
AT fuyuyang effectofsucroseandlacticacidbacteriaadditivesonfermentationqualitychemicalcompositionandproteinfractionsoftwotypicalwoodyforagesilages