Sex-differences in Mountain Ultra-trail Performance: Look at the Scenery

Abstract There is a growing body of literature on sex-differences in human performance, particularly in the context of endurance sports. However, several mechanisms (e.g., higher type 1 fibres proportion; lesser neuromuscular fatigue; higher metabolic flexibility etc) have been previously proposed a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sports Medicine - Open
Main Authors: Grégoire P. Millet, Alexa Callovini, Antoine Raberin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-07-01
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00894-x
_version_ 1849417430673129472
author Grégoire P. Millet
Alexa Callovini
Antoine Raberin
author_facet Grégoire P. Millet
Alexa Callovini
Antoine Raberin
author_sort Grégoire P. Millet
collection DOAJ
container_title Sports Medicine - Open
description Abstract There is a growing body of literature on sex-differences in human performance, particularly in the context of endurance sports. However, several mechanisms (e.g., higher type 1 fibres proportion; lesser neuromuscular fatigue; higher metabolic flexibility etc) have been previously proposed and suggest an advantage to females over ultra-endurance competitions on flat terrain. However, in mountain ultramarathon, the percent sex difference between male and female records appears to be larger than on various road/track running distances on flat terrain, suggesting that additional factors related to the specific mountainous conditions may be at play. In this Current Opinion, we point to three specific factors that are likely to influence and widen sex differences in ultra-distance running events performed in the mountains (i.e., uphill– downhill locomotion, altitude, and changes in extreme ambient temperatures). First, the sex differences in uphill endurance performance are approximately two times larger than those in events primarily performed on flat terrain (i.e., 18–22% vs. 9–12%, respectively), mainly due to the detrimental influence of the lower lean mass to fat mass ratio and lower fast twitch/type II fibre type proportion in females). At altitude, the ventilatory response to exercise emerges as one of the most sex-sensitive factors that may modify reactions to hypoxia. A diffusive mechanism appears to be involved in the larger hypoxemia commonly reported in females. Finally, responses to cold environments are also sex-dependent, with females exhibiting lower muscle mass, which limits thermogenic heat production, a higher body surface area-to-mass ratio, and a greater prevalence of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Altogether, these specific factors must be further understood when analyzing sex-differences in mountain ultra-trail performance. Don’t forget to look at the scenery!
format Article
id doaj-art-213260945ede423d97f6bb6ab478794e
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2198-9761
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-213260945ede423d97f6bb6ab478794e2025-08-20T03:46:04ZengSpringerOpenSports Medicine - Open2198-97612025-07-011111710.1186/s40798-025-00894-xSex-differences in Mountain Ultra-trail Performance: Look at the SceneryGrégoire P. Millet0Alexa Callovini1Antoine Raberin2Institute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of LausanneInstitute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of LausanneInstitute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of LausanneAbstract There is a growing body of literature on sex-differences in human performance, particularly in the context of endurance sports. However, several mechanisms (e.g., higher type 1 fibres proportion; lesser neuromuscular fatigue; higher metabolic flexibility etc) have been previously proposed and suggest an advantage to females over ultra-endurance competitions on flat terrain. However, in mountain ultramarathon, the percent sex difference between male and female records appears to be larger than on various road/track running distances on flat terrain, suggesting that additional factors related to the specific mountainous conditions may be at play. In this Current Opinion, we point to three specific factors that are likely to influence and widen sex differences in ultra-distance running events performed in the mountains (i.e., uphill– downhill locomotion, altitude, and changes in extreme ambient temperatures). First, the sex differences in uphill endurance performance are approximately two times larger than those in events primarily performed on flat terrain (i.e., 18–22% vs. 9–12%, respectively), mainly due to the detrimental influence of the lower lean mass to fat mass ratio and lower fast twitch/type II fibre type proportion in females). At altitude, the ventilatory response to exercise emerges as one of the most sex-sensitive factors that may modify reactions to hypoxia. A diffusive mechanism appears to be involved in the larger hypoxemia commonly reported in females. Finally, responses to cold environments are also sex-dependent, with females exhibiting lower muscle mass, which limits thermogenic heat production, a higher body surface area-to-mass ratio, and a greater prevalence of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Altogether, these specific factors must be further understood when analyzing sex-differences in mountain ultra-trail performance. Don’t forget to look at the scenery!https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00894-x
spellingShingle Grégoire P. Millet
Alexa Callovini
Antoine Raberin
Sex-differences in Mountain Ultra-trail Performance: Look at the Scenery
title Sex-differences in Mountain Ultra-trail Performance: Look at the Scenery
title_full Sex-differences in Mountain Ultra-trail Performance: Look at the Scenery
title_fullStr Sex-differences in Mountain Ultra-trail Performance: Look at the Scenery
title_full_unstemmed Sex-differences in Mountain Ultra-trail Performance: Look at the Scenery
title_short Sex-differences in Mountain Ultra-trail Performance: Look at the Scenery
title_sort sex differences in mountain ultra trail performance look at the scenery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00894-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoirepmillet sexdifferencesinmountainultratrailperformancelookatthescenery
AT alexacallovini sexdifferencesinmountainultratrailperformancelookatthescenery
AT antoineraberin sexdifferencesinmountainultratrailperformancelookatthescenery