Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise

It's well documented that noise damages peripheral part of the auditory tract (cochlea). Only few investigations were performed to assess central hearing disturbances caused by noise on animal. The aim of the study was to evaluate the site of hearing damage in 2 groups of individuals exposed t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of Acoustics
Main Authors: Ewa ZAMYSŁOWSKA-SZMYTKE, Piotr KOTYŁO, Marek BĄK, Adrian FUENTE, Mariola ŚLIWIŃSKA-KOWALSKA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences 2014-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acoustics.ippt.pan.pl/index.php/aa/article/view/813
_version_ 1849552176128458752
author Ewa ZAMYSŁOWSKA-SZMYTKE
Piotr KOTYŁO
Marek BĄK
Adrian FUENTE
Mariola ŚLIWIŃSKA-KOWALSKA
author_facet Ewa ZAMYSŁOWSKA-SZMYTKE
Piotr KOTYŁO
Marek BĄK
Adrian FUENTE
Mariola ŚLIWIŃSKA-KOWALSKA
author_sort Ewa ZAMYSŁOWSKA-SZMYTKE
collection DOAJ
container_title Archives of Acoustics
description It's well documented that noise damages peripheral part of the auditory tract (cochlea). Only few investigations were performed to assess central hearing disturbances caused by noise on animal. The aim of the study was to evaluate the site of hearing damage in 2 groups of individuals exposed to different types of noise. First group consisted of 62 dockyard workers exposed to impulsive noise with co-exposure to hand-arm vibration while second group included 76 bottle glass factory workers exposed to continuous steady-state noise. Results were referred to 86 control subjects exposed neither to noise nor vibrations. Pure-tone audiometry, immitance audiometry, Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and cognitive-event relate auditory evoked potentials (wave P-300) were performed in all subjects. Audiometric results revealed the poorest hearing level in dockyard workers among all groups. The bottle factory workers had also significant hearing impairment at high frequencies as compared to controls. Although the wave V at the ABR was prolonged in the dockyard workers this change could reflect sensorineural hearing thresholds shift and retrocochlear damage. The latency of P-300 wave was prolonged in dockyard workers exclusively suggesting a cortical effect of exposure to impulsive noise. Conclusions. Exposure to high level impulsive noise in combination with hand-arm vibration may cause hearing deficit greater than expected. Abnormalities involve peripheral and central auditory system. More observations are necessary to confirm these findings.
format Article
id doaj-art-2508dfd781b64ba894bebbb2a39fbfca
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0137-5075
2300-262X
language English
publishDate 2014-05-01
publisher Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-2508dfd781b64ba894bebbb2a39fbfca2025-08-20T02:39:13ZengInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of SciencesArchives of Acoustics0137-50752300-262X2014-05-01322Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noiseEwa ZAMYSŁOWSKA-SZMYTKE0Piotr KOTYŁO1Marek BĄK2Adrian FUENTE3Mariola ŚLIWIŃSKA-KOWALSKA4Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Department of Physical HazardsNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Department of Physical HazardsNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Department of Physical HazardsNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Department of Physical HazardsNofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Department of Physical HazardsIt's well documented that noise damages peripheral part of the auditory tract (cochlea). Only few investigations were performed to assess central hearing disturbances caused by noise on animal. The aim of the study was to evaluate the site of hearing damage in 2 groups of individuals exposed to different types of noise. First group consisted of 62 dockyard workers exposed to impulsive noise with co-exposure to hand-arm vibration while second group included 76 bottle glass factory workers exposed to continuous steady-state noise. Results were referred to 86 control subjects exposed neither to noise nor vibrations. Pure-tone audiometry, immitance audiometry, Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and cognitive-event relate auditory evoked potentials (wave P-300) were performed in all subjects. Audiometric results revealed the poorest hearing level in dockyard workers among all groups. The bottle factory workers had also significant hearing impairment at high frequencies as compared to controls. Although the wave V at the ABR was prolonged in the dockyard workers this change could reflect sensorineural hearing thresholds shift and retrocochlear damage. The latency of P-300 wave was prolonged in dockyard workers exclusively suggesting a cortical effect of exposure to impulsive noise. Conclusions. Exposure to high level impulsive noise in combination with hand-arm vibration may cause hearing deficit greater than expected. Abnormalities involve peripheral and central auditory system. More observations are necessary to confirm these findings.https://acoustics.ippt.pan.pl/index.php/aa/article/view/813pure-tone audiometryimmitance audiometryABRcognitive-event
spellingShingle Ewa ZAMYSŁOWSKA-SZMYTKE
Piotr KOTYŁO
Marek BĄK
Adrian FUENTE
Mariola ŚLIWIŃSKA-KOWALSKA
Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise
pure-tone audiometry
immitance audiometry
ABR
cognitive-event
title Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise
title_full Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise
title_fullStr Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise
title_full_unstemmed Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise
title_short Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise
title_sort hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise
topic pure-tone audiometry
immitance audiometry
ABR
cognitive-event
url https://acoustics.ippt.pan.pl/index.php/aa/article/view/813
work_keys_str_mv AT ewazamysłowskaszmytke hearinglossinworkersexposedtodifferenttypeofnoise
AT piotrkotyło hearinglossinworkersexposedtodifferenttypeofnoise
AT marekbak hearinglossinworkersexposedtodifferenttypeofnoise
AT adrianfuente hearinglossinworkersexposedtodifferenttypeofnoise
AT mariolasliwinskakowalska hearinglossinworkersexposedtodifferenttypeofnoise