Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding

Facial expressions inform about other peoples’ emotion and motivation and thus are central for social communication. However, the meaning of facial expressions may change depending on what we have learned about the related consequences. For instance, a smile might easily become threatening when disp...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Frontiers in Psychology
主要な著者: Florian Bublatzky, Martin Riemer, Pedro Guerra
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02091/full
_version_ 1857041639756791808
author Florian Bublatzky
Florian Bublatzky
Martin Riemer
Martin Riemer
Pedro Guerra
author_facet Florian Bublatzky
Florian Bublatzky
Martin Riemer
Martin Riemer
Pedro Guerra
author_sort Florian Bublatzky
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Psychology
description Facial expressions inform about other peoples’ emotion and motivation and thus are central for social communication. However, the meaning of facial expressions may change depending on what we have learned about the related consequences. For instance, a smile might easily become threatening when displayed by a person who is known to be dangerous. The present study examined the malleability of emotional facial valence by means of social learning. To this end, facial expressions served as cues for verbally instructed threat-of-shock or safety (e.g., “happy faces cue shocks”). Moreover, reversal instructions tested the flexibility of threat/safety associations (e.g., “now happy faces cue safety”). Throughout the experiment, happy, neutral, and angry facial expressions were presented and auditory startle probes elicited defensive reflex activity. Results show that self-reported ratings and physiological reactions to threat/safety cues dissociate. Regarding threat and valence ratings, happy facial expressions tended to be more resistant becoming a threat cue, and angry faces remain threatening even when instructed as safety cue. For physiological response systems, however, we observed threat-potentiated startle reflex and enhanced skin conductance responses for threat compared to safety cues regardless of whether threat was cued by happy or angry faces. Thus, the incongruity of visual and verbal threat/safety information modulates conscious perception, but not the activation of physiological response systems. These results show that verbal instructions can readily overwrite the intrinsic meaning of facial emotions, with clear benefits for social communication as learning and anticipation of threat and safety readjusted to accurately track environmental changes.
format Article
id doaj-art-29eaeb7b1c294302aaebc1dd94cc59fa
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-1078
language English
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-29eaeb7b1c294302aaebc1dd94cc59fa2025-08-19T19:36:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-09-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.02091464242Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological RespondingFlorian Bublatzky0Florian Bublatzky1Martin Riemer2Martin Riemer3Pedro Guerra4Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, GermanyAging & Cognition Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, GermanyFaculty for Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsDepartment of Personality, University of Granada, Granada, SpainFacial expressions inform about other peoples’ emotion and motivation and thus are central for social communication. However, the meaning of facial expressions may change depending on what we have learned about the related consequences. For instance, a smile might easily become threatening when displayed by a person who is known to be dangerous. The present study examined the malleability of emotional facial valence by means of social learning. To this end, facial expressions served as cues for verbally instructed threat-of-shock or safety (e.g., “happy faces cue shocks”). Moreover, reversal instructions tested the flexibility of threat/safety associations (e.g., “now happy faces cue safety”). Throughout the experiment, happy, neutral, and angry facial expressions were presented and auditory startle probes elicited defensive reflex activity. Results show that self-reported ratings and physiological reactions to threat/safety cues dissociate. Regarding threat and valence ratings, happy facial expressions tended to be more resistant becoming a threat cue, and angry faces remain threatening even when instructed as safety cue. For physiological response systems, however, we observed threat-potentiated startle reflex and enhanced skin conductance responses for threat compared to safety cues regardless of whether threat was cued by happy or angry faces. Thus, the incongruity of visual and verbal threat/safety information modulates conscious perception, but not the activation of physiological response systems. These results show that verbal instructions can readily overwrite the intrinsic meaning of facial emotions, with clear benefits for social communication as learning and anticipation of threat and safety readjusted to accurately track environmental changes.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02091/fullreversal learningemotional facial expressionthreat-of-shockstartle reflexsocial learning
spellingShingle Florian Bublatzky
Florian Bublatzky
Martin Riemer
Martin Riemer
Pedro Guerra
Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding
reversal learning
emotional facial expression
threat-of-shock
startle reflex
social learning
title Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding
title_full Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding
title_fullStr Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding
title_full_unstemmed Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding
title_short Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding
title_sort reversing threat to safety incongruence of facial emotions and instructed threat modulates conscious perception but not physiological responding
topic reversal learning
emotional facial expression
threat-of-shock
startle reflex
social learning
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02091/full
work_keys_str_mv AT florianbublatzky reversingthreattosafetyincongruenceoffacialemotionsandinstructedthreatmodulatesconsciousperceptionbutnotphysiologicalresponding
AT florianbublatzky reversingthreattosafetyincongruenceoffacialemotionsandinstructedthreatmodulatesconsciousperceptionbutnotphysiologicalresponding
AT martinriemer reversingthreattosafetyincongruenceoffacialemotionsandinstructedthreatmodulatesconsciousperceptionbutnotphysiologicalresponding
AT martinriemer reversingthreattosafetyincongruenceoffacialemotionsandinstructedthreatmodulatesconsciousperceptionbutnotphysiologicalresponding
AT pedroguerra reversingthreattosafetyincongruenceoffacialemotionsandinstructedthreatmodulatesconsciousperceptionbutnotphysiologicalresponding