Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses
Abstract In the primary analysis (32.3-month median follow-up) of the randomized, phase 3 AURIGA study (NCT03901963), daratumumab-lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance significantly improved MRD-negative conversion rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 47% versus R maintenance in an...
| Published in: | Blood Cancer Journal |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2025-10-01
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01355-0 |
| _version_ | 1848760354988883968 |
|---|---|
| author | Laahn Foster Larry D. Anderson Alfred Chung Chakra P. Chaulagain Erin Pettijohn Andrew J. Cowan Caitlin Costello Sarah Larson Douglas W. Sborov Kenneth H. Shain Rebecca Silbermann Peter Voorhees Maria Krevvata Huiling Pei Sharmila Patel Vipin Khare Annelore Cortoos Robin Carson Thomas S. Lin Ashraf Badros |
| author_facet | Laahn Foster Larry D. Anderson Alfred Chung Chakra P. Chaulagain Erin Pettijohn Andrew J. Cowan Caitlin Costello Sarah Larson Douglas W. Sborov Kenneth H. Shain Rebecca Silbermann Peter Voorhees Maria Krevvata Huiling Pei Sharmila Patel Vipin Khare Annelore Cortoos Robin Carson Thomas S. Lin Ashraf Badros |
| author_sort | Laahn Foster |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Blood Cancer Journal |
| description | Abstract In the primary analysis (32.3-month median follow-up) of the randomized, phase 3 AURIGA study (NCT03901963), daratumumab-lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance significantly improved MRD-negative conversion rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 47% versus R maintenance in anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody–naïve and post-transplant MRD-positive patients with newly diagnosed MM. Here, we present a post hoc analysis across relevant subgroups, including high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per original, revised, and modified International Myeloma Society (IMS) 2024 criteria. MRD-negative (10−5) conversion rates by 12 months of maintenance were higher for D-R versus R across cytogenetically high-risk subgroups per original (31.8% vs 6.7%), revised (43.8% vs 13.3%), and modified IMS 2024 (41.2% vs 0%) criteria and cytogenetically ultra-high–risk disease (≥2 revised HRCAs; 54.5% vs 0%). Similar trends in overall MRD-negative conversion rates were observed across subgroups. D-R demonstrated a trend towards improved PFS versus R (HR [95% CI]) in cytogenetically high-risk subgroups per original (0.60 [0.21–1.70]), revised (0.53 [0.21–1.31]), and modified IMS 2024 (0.45 [0.13–1.53]) criteria and cytogenetically ultra-high–risk disease (0.61 [0.17–2.25]). Similar outcomes were observed regardless of age or race, with no additional safety concerns among older (≥65 years) or Black patients. These data support the benefit of D-R maintenance regardless of age, race, and risk status. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2b73ea2fa8034dbf82cd2e01ac878183 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2044-5385 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-10-01 |
| publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-2b73ea2fa8034dbf82cd2e01ac8781832025-10-12T11:13:02ZengNature Publishing GroupBlood Cancer Journal2044-53852025-10-0115111010.1038/s41408-025-01355-0Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analysesLaahn Foster0Larry D. Anderson1Alfred Chung2Chakra P. Chaulagain3Erin Pettijohn4Andrew J. Cowan5Caitlin Costello6Sarah Larson7Douglas W. Sborov8Kenneth H. Shain9Rebecca Silbermann10Peter Voorhees11Maria Krevvata12Huiling Pei13Sharmila Patel14Vipin Khare15Annelore Cortoos16Robin Carson17Thomas S. Lin18Ashraf Badros19Division of Hematology Oncology, University of VirginiaMyeloma, Waldenstrom’s and Amyloidosis Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical CenterDepartment of Medicine, University of California San FranciscoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Cleveland Clinic FloridaCancer and Hematology Centers of Western MichiganDivision of Medical Oncology, Fred Hutch Cancer Center/University of WashingtonMoores Cancer Center, University of California San DiegoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of UtahDepartment of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science UniversityLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest University School of MedicineJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonGreenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of MarylandAbstract In the primary analysis (32.3-month median follow-up) of the randomized, phase 3 AURIGA study (NCT03901963), daratumumab-lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance significantly improved MRD-negative conversion rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 47% versus R maintenance in anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody–naïve and post-transplant MRD-positive patients with newly diagnosed MM. Here, we present a post hoc analysis across relevant subgroups, including high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per original, revised, and modified International Myeloma Society (IMS) 2024 criteria. MRD-negative (10−5) conversion rates by 12 months of maintenance were higher for D-R versus R across cytogenetically high-risk subgroups per original (31.8% vs 6.7%), revised (43.8% vs 13.3%), and modified IMS 2024 (41.2% vs 0%) criteria and cytogenetically ultra-high–risk disease (≥2 revised HRCAs; 54.5% vs 0%). Similar trends in overall MRD-negative conversion rates were observed across subgroups. D-R demonstrated a trend towards improved PFS versus R (HR [95% CI]) in cytogenetically high-risk subgroups per original (0.60 [0.21–1.70]), revised (0.53 [0.21–1.31]), and modified IMS 2024 (0.45 [0.13–1.53]) criteria and cytogenetically ultra-high–risk disease (0.61 [0.17–2.25]). Similar outcomes were observed regardless of age or race, with no additional safety concerns among older (≥65 years) or Black patients. These data support the benefit of D-R maintenance regardless of age, race, and risk status.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01355-0 |
| spellingShingle | Laahn Foster Larry D. Anderson Alfred Chung Chakra P. Chaulagain Erin Pettijohn Andrew J. Cowan Caitlin Costello Sarah Larson Douglas W. Sborov Kenneth H. Shain Rebecca Silbermann Peter Voorhees Maria Krevvata Huiling Pei Sharmila Patel Vipin Khare Annelore Cortoos Robin Carson Thomas S. Lin Ashraf Badros Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses |
| title | Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses |
| title_full | Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses |
| title_fullStr | Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses |
| title_short | Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses |
| title_sort | daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant auriga subgroup analyses |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01355-0 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT laahnfoster daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT larrydanderson daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT alfredchung daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT chakrapchaulagain daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT erinpettijohn daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT andrewjcowan daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT caitlincostello daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT sarahlarson daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT douglaswsborov daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT kennethhshain daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT rebeccasilbermann daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT petervoorhees daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT mariakrevvata daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT huilingpei daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT sharmilapatel daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT vipinkhare daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT annelorecortoos daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT robincarson daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT thomasslin daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses AT ashrafbadros daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses |
