Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses

Abstract In the primary analysis (32.3-month median follow-up) of the randomized, phase 3 AURIGA study (NCT03901963), daratumumab-lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance significantly improved MRD-negative conversion rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 47% versus R maintenance in an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood Cancer Journal
Main Authors: Laahn Foster, Larry D. Anderson, Alfred Chung, Chakra P. Chaulagain, Erin Pettijohn, Andrew J. Cowan, Caitlin Costello, Sarah Larson, Douglas W. Sborov, Kenneth H. Shain, Rebecca Silbermann, Peter Voorhees, Maria Krevvata, Huiling Pei, Sharmila Patel, Vipin Khare, Annelore Cortoos, Robin Carson, Thomas S. Lin, Ashraf Badros
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2025-10-01
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01355-0
_version_ 1848760354988883968
author Laahn Foster
Larry D. Anderson
Alfred Chung
Chakra P. Chaulagain
Erin Pettijohn
Andrew J. Cowan
Caitlin Costello
Sarah Larson
Douglas W. Sborov
Kenneth H. Shain
Rebecca Silbermann
Peter Voorhees
Maria Krevvata
Huiling Pei
Sharmila Patel
Vipin Khare
Annelore Cortoos
Robin Carson
Thomas S. Lin
Ashraf Badros
author_facet Laahn Foster
Larry D. Anderson
Alfred Chung
Chakra P. Chaulagain
Erin Pettijohn
Andrew J. Cowan
Caitlin Costello
Sarah Larson
Douglas W. Sborov
Kenneth H. Shain
Rebecca Silbermann
Peter Voorhees
Maria Krevvata
Huiling Pei
Sharmila Patel
Vipin Khare
Annelore Cortoos
Robin Carson
Thomas S. Lin
Ashraf Badros
author_sort Laahn Foster
collection DOAJ
container_title Blood Cancer Journal
description Abstract In the primary analysis (32.3-month median follow-up) of the randomized, phase 3 AURIGA study (NCT03901963), daratumumab-lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance significantly improved MRD-negative conversion rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 47% versus R maintenance in anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody–naïve and post-transplant MRD-positive patients with newly diagnosed MM. Here, we present a post hoc analysis across relevant subgroups, including high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per original, revised, and modified International Myeloma Society (IMS) 2024 criteria. MRD-negative (10−5) conversion rates by 12 months of maintenance were higher for D-R versus R across cytogenetically high-risk subgroups per original (31.8% vs 6.7%), revised (43.8% vs 13.3%), and modified IMS 2024 (41.2% vs 0%) criteria and cytogenetically ultra-high–risk disease (≥2 revised HRCAs; 54.5% vs 0%). Similar trends in overall MRD-negative conversion rates were observed across subgroups. D-R demonstrated a trend towards improved PFS versus R (HR [95% CI]) in cytogenetically high-risk subgroups per original (0.60 [0.21–1.70]), revised (0.53 [0.21–1.31]), and modified IMS 2024 (0.45 [0.13–1.53]) criteria and cytogenetically ultra-high–risk disease (0.61 [0.17–2.25]). Similar outcomes were observed regardless of age or race, with no additional safety concerns among older (≥65 years) or Black patients. These data support the benefit of D-R maintenance regardless of age, race, and risk status.
format Article
id doaj-art-2b73ea2fa8034dbf82cd2e01ac878183
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2044-5385
language English
publishDate 2025-10-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-2b73ea2fa8034dbf82cd2e01ac8781832025-10-12T11:13:02ZengNature Publishing GroupBlood Cancer Journal2044-53852025-10-0115111010.1038/s41408-025-01355-0Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analysesLaahn Foster0Larry D. Anderson1Alfred Chung2Chakra P. Chaulagain3Erin Pettijohn4Andrew J. Cowan5Caitlin Costello6Sarah Larson7Douglas W. Sborov8Kenneth H. Shain9Rebecca Silbermann10Peter Voorhees11Maria Krevvata12Huiling Pei13Sharmila Patel14Vipin Khare15Annelore Cortoos16Robin Carson17Thomas S. Lin18Ashraf Badros19Division of Hematology Oncology, University of VirginiaMyeloma, Waldenstrom’s and Amyloidosis Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical CenterDepartment of Medicine, University of California San FranciscoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Cleveland Clinic FloridaCancer and Hematology Centers of Western MichiganDivision of Medical Oncology, Fred Hutch Cancer Center/University of WashingtonMoores Cancer Center, University of California San DiegoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of UtahDepartment of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science UniversityLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest University School of MedicineJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonJohnson & JohnsonGreenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of MarylandAbstract In the primary analysis (32.3-month median follow-up) of the randomized, phase 3 AURIGA study (NCT03901963), daratumumab-lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance significantly improved MRD-negative conversion rates and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 47% versus R maintenance in anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody–naïve and post-transplant MRD-positive patients with newly diagnosed MM. Here, we present a post hoc analysis across relevant subgroups, including high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per original, revised, and modified International Myeloma Society (IMS) 2024 criteria. MRD-negative (10−5) conversion rates by 12 months of maintenance were higher for D-R versus R across cytogenetically high-risk subgroups per original (31.8% vs 6.7%), revised (43.8% vs 13.3%), and modified IMS 2024 (41.2% vs 0%) criteria and cytogenetically ultra-high–risk disease (≥2 revised HRCAs; 54.5% vs 0%). Similar trends in overall MRD-negative conversion rates were observed across subgroups. D-R demonstrated a trend towards improved PFS versus R (HR [95% CI]) in cytogenetically high-risk subgroups per original (0.60 [0.21–1.70]), revised (0.53 [0.21–1.31]), and modified IMS 2024 (0.45 [0.13–1.53]) criteria and cytogenetically ultra-high–risk disease (0.61 [0.17–2.25]). Similar outcomes were observed regardless of age or race, with no additional safety concerns among older (≥65 years) or Black patients. These data support the benefit of D-R maintenance regardless of age, race, and risk status.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01355-0
spellingShingle Laahn Foster
Larry D. Anderson
Alfred Chung
Chakra P. Chaulagain
Erin Pettijohn
Andrew J. Cowan
Caitlin Costello
Sarah Larson
Douglas W. Sborov
Kenneth H. Shain
Rebecca Silbermann
Peter Voorhees
Maria Krevvata
Huiling Pei
Sharmila Patel
Vipin Khare
Annelore Cortoos
Robin Carson
Thomas S. Lin
Ashraf Badros
Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses
title Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses
title_full Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses
title_fullStr Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses
title_full_unstemmed Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses
title_short Daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant: AURIGA subgroup analyses
title_sort daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after transplant auriga subgroup analyses
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01355-0
work_keys_str_mv AT laahnfoster daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT larrydanderson daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT alfredchung daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT chakrapchaulagain daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT erinpettijohn daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT andrewjcowan daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT caitlincostello daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT sarahlarson daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT douglaswsborov daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT kennethhshain daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT rebeccasilbermann daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT petervoorhees daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT mariakrevvata daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT huilingpei daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT sharmilapatel daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT vipinkhare daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT annelorecortoos daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT robincarson daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT thomasslin daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses
AT ashrafbadros daratumumabpluslenalidomidemaintenanceinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaaftertransplantaurigasubgroupanalyses