Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results

In 2022, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) assessed the creative thinking skills of 15-year-old students, measuring their ability to generate creative ideas and improve others’ ideas. The present study used a correlational design to explore the relationship between creative t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Education Sciences
Main Authors: José Hernández-Ramos, Roberto Araya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/2/133
_version_ 1849740333821198336
author José Hernández-Ramos
Roberto Araya
author_facet José Hernández-Ramos
Roberto Araya
author_sort José Hernández-Ramos
collection DOAJ
container_title Education Sciences
description In 2022, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) assessed the creative thinking skills of 15-year-old students, measuring their ability to generate creative ideas and improve others’ ideas. The present study used a correlational design to explore the relationship between creative thinking test scores and the frequency of participation in school activities. Surprisingly, the results show that countries with higher participation in school activities obtained worse results in the global PISA test for creative thinking and scientific problem-solving. Even after adjusting for PISA performance in 2018 and 2022, the increase in school activities did not improve low creativity scores. PISA identified this result as counterintuitive but analyzed it at the student level. However, we examined the phenomenon at the country level, which allows us to suggest another explanation. These findings indicate that such activities may need to be more enriching, focusing more on developing divergent rather than convergent skills. The complexity and cognitive load teachers require to design and carry out highly creative activities may explain these results. This study proposes reconsidering the pedagogical implementation of these activities and incorporating generative artificial intelligence as a fundamental tool to enhance creative development in the educational environment.
format Article
id doaj-art-2c1958db9aeb4f40be4f0163f95e883a
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2227-7102
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-2c1958db9aeb4f40be4f0163f95e883a2025-08-20T01:47:04ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022025-01-0115213310.3390/educsci15020133Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA ResultsJosé Hernández-Ramos0Roberto Araya1Centro de Investigación Avanzada en Educación, Instituto de Educación, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, ChileCentro de Investigación Avanzada en Educación, Instituto de Educación, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, ChileIn 2022, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) assessed the creative thinking skills of 15-year-old students, measuring their ability to generate creative ideas and improve others’ ideas. The present study used a correlational design to explore the relationship between creative thinking test scores and the frequency of participation in school activities. Surprisingly, the results show that countries with higher participation in school activities obtained worse results in the global PISA test for creative thinking and scientific problem-solving. Even after adjusting for PISA performance in 2018 and 2022, the increase in school activities did not improve low creativity scores. PISA identified this result as counterintuitive but analyzed it at the student level. However, we examined the phenomenon at the country level, which allows us to suggest another explanation. These findings indicate that such activities may need to be more enriching, focusing more on developing divergent rather than convergent skills. The complexity and cognitive load teachers require to design and carry out highly creative activities may explain these results. This study proposes reconsidering the pedagogical implementation of these activities and incorporating generative artificial intelligence as a fundamental tool to enhance creative development in the educational environment.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/2/133creative thinkingPISAcreative solving problemscientific problem solvingteaching and learning
spellingShingle José Hernández-Ramos
Roberto Araya
Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results
creative thinking
PISA
creative solving problem
scientific problem solving
teaching and learning
title Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results
title_full Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results
title_fullStr Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results
title_full_unstemmed Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results
title_short Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results
title_sort do school activities foster creative thinking an analysis of pisa results
topic creative thinking
PISA
creative solving problem
scientific problem solving
teaching and learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/2/133
work_keys_str_mv AT josehernandezramos doschoolactivitiesfostercreativethinkingananalysisofpisaresults
AT robertoaraya doschoolactivitiesfostercreativethinkingananalysisofpisaresults