Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results
In 2022, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) assessed the creative thinking skills of 15-year-old students, measuring their ability to generate creative ideas and improve others’ ideas. The present study used a correlational design to explore the relationship between creative t...
| Published in: | Education Sciences |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/2/133 |
| _version_ | 1849740333821198336 |
|---|---|
| author | José Hernández-Ramos Roberto Araya |
| author_facet | José Hernández-Ramos Roberto Araya |
| author_sort | José Hernández-Ramos |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Education Sciences |
| description | In 2022, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) assessed the creative thinking skills of 15-year-old students, measuring their ability to generate creative ideas and improve others’ ideas. The present study used a correlational design to explore the relationship between creative thinking test scores and the frequency of participation in school activities. Surprisingly, the results show that countries with higher participation in school activities obtained worse results in the global PISA test for creative thinking and scientific problem-solving. Even after adjusting for PISA performance in 2018 and 2022, the increase in school activities did not improve low creativity scores. PISA identified this result as counterintuitive but analyzed it at the student level. However, we examined the phenomenon at the country level, which allows us to suggest another explanation. These findings indicate that such activities may need to be more enriching, focusing more on developing divergent rather than convergent skills. The complexity and cognitive load teachers require to design and carry out highly creative activities may explain these results. This study proposes reconsidering the pedagogical implementation of these activities and incorporating generative artificial intelligence as a fundamental tool to enhance creative development in the educational environment. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2c1958db9aeb4f40be4f0163f95e883a |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2227-7102 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-2c1958db9aeb4f40be4f0163f95e883a2025-08-20T01:47:04ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022025-01-0115213310.3390/educsci15020133Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA ResultsJosé Hernández-Ramos0Roberto Araya1Centro de Investigación Avanzada en Educación, Instituto de Educación, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, ChileCentro de Investigación Avanzada en Educación, Instituto de Educación, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, ChileIn 2022, the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) assessed the creative thinking skills of 15-year-old students, measuring their ability to generate creative ideas and improve others’ ideas. The present study used a correlational design to explore the relationship between creative thinking test scores and the frequency of participation in school activities. Surprisingly, the results show that countries with higher participation in school activities obtained worse results in the global PISA test for creative thinking and scientific problem-solving. Even after adjusting for PISA performance in 2018 and 2022, the increase in school activities did not improve low creativity scores. PISA identified this result as counterintuitive but analyzed it at the student level. However, we examined the phenomenon at the country level, which allows us to suggest another explanation. These findings indicate that such activities may need to be more enriching, focusing more on developing divergent rather than convergent skills. The complexity and cognitive load teachers require to design and carry out highly creative activities may explain these results. This study proposes reconsidering the pedagogical implementation of these activities and incorporating generative artificial intelligence as a fundamental tool to enhance creative development in the educational environment.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/2/133creative thinkingPISAcreative solving problemscientific problem solvingteaching and learning |
| spellingShingle | José Hernández-Ramos Roberto Araya Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results creative thinking PISA creative solving problem scientific problem solving teaching and learning |
| title | Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results |
| title_full | Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results |
| title_fullStr | Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results |
| title_short | Do School Activities Foster Creative Thinking? An Analysis of PISA Results |
| title_sort | do school activities foster creative thinking an analysis of pisa results |
| topic | creative thinking PISA creative solving problem scientific problem solving teaching and learning |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/2/133 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT josehernandezramos doschoolactivitiesfostercreativethinkingananalysisofpisaresults AT robertoaraya doschoolactivitiesfostercreativethinkingananalysisofpisaresults |
