Impacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers: A systematic review

Background. Law enforcement officers (LEOs) wear duty belts to hold the specialised equipment required to complete their daily occupational tasks. The aim of this review was to identify, collect, and synthesize research investigating the impacts of duty belts and load placement on LEOs. Methods: A s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Main Authors: Berner Nolan, Biilmann Christopher, Hunter Daniel, Canetti Elisa, Schram Ben, Dawes Jay, Lockie Robert, Orr Robin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade 2024-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2024/0354-88722402067B.pdf
_version_ 1850039107871309824
author Berner Nolan
Biilmann Christopher
Hunter Daniel
Canetti Elisa
Schram Ben
Dawes Jay
Lockie Robert
Orr Robin
author_facet Berner Nolan
Biilmann Christopher
Hunter Daniel
Canetti Elisa
Schram Ben
Dawes Jay
Lockie Robert
Orr Robin
author_sort Berner Nolan
collection DOAJ
container_title NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
description Background. Law enforcement officers (LEOs) wear duty belts to hold the specialised equipment required to complete their daily occupational tasks. The aim of this review was to identify, collect, and synthesize research investigating the impacts of duty belts and load placement on LEOs. Methods: A systematic review, registered with the Open Science Framework, was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Five databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) with identified studies considered against eligibility criteria. Included studies were critically appraised by two reviewers independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist or the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Results: Ten studies (mean appraisal score = 79.8%; Kappa agreement = 0.73) informed the review revealing two main emerging themes; occupational impacts (task performance, vehicle duties, and weapon draw time), and movement impacts (balance, gait, and jump-based movements). Nine studies found duty belts and equipment loads, regardless of placement, negatively impacted LEO occupational tasks and movements in general. There were some differences in the nature of the impacts (e.g., areas of pressure with different systems). One study found no differences in performance between hip versus thigh holsters. Conclusions: The evidence suggests that LEO duty belts, their attachments, and the loads imparted by their equipment have a negative impact on performance of occupational tasks as well as officer movement, increasing injury potential. There were some differences in impacts based on load placement warranting consideration and further research.
format Article
id doaj-art-2c1d2b6793a34415917c941b4f4bf4fc
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0354-8872
2620-0406
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-2c1d2b6793a34415917c941b4f4bf4fc2025-08-20T00:32:37ZengUniversity of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, BelgradeNBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija0354-88722620-04062024-01-01292679310.5937/nabepo29-498790354-88722402067BImpacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers: A systematic reviewBerner Nolan0Biilmann Christopher1Hunter Daniel2Canetti Elisa3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-398XSchram Ben4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1865-0488Dawes Jay5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-8873Lockie Robert6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-0294Orr Robin7https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8297-8288Bond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, AustraliaBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, AustraliaBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, AustraliaBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, AustraliaBond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, AustraliaOklahoma State University, Department of Health and Human Performance, Stillwater, USACalifornia State University, Department of Kinesiology, Fullerton, USABond University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, AustraliaBackground. Law enforcement officers (LEOs) wear duty belts to hold the specialised equipment required to complete their daily occupational tasks. The aim of this review was to identify, collect, and synthesize research investigating the impacts of duty belts and load placement on LEOs. Methods: A systematic review, registered with the Open Science Framework, was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Five databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) with identified studies considered against eligibility criteria. Included studies were critically appraised by two reviewers independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist or the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Results: Ten studies (mean appraisal score = 79.8%; Kappa agreement = 0.73) informed the review revealing two main emerging themes; occupational impacts (task performance, vehicle duties, and weapon draw time), and movement impacts (balance, gait, and jump-based movements). Nine studies found duty belts and equipment loads, regardless of placement, negatively impacted LEO occupational tasks and movements in general. There were some differences in the nature of the impacts (e.g., areas of pressure with different systems). One study found no differences in performance between hip versus thigh holsters. Conclusions: The evidence suggests that LEO duty belts, their attachments, and the loads imparted by their equipment have a negative impact on performance of occupational tasks as well as officer movement, increasing injury potential. There were some differences in impacts based on load placement warranting consideration and further research.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2024/0354-88722402067B.pdflaw enforcementload carriageaccoutrements beltload bearing vestduty loadsoccupational healthback injuryinjury prevention
spellingShingle Berner Nolan
Biilmann Christopher
Hunter Daniel
Canetti Elisa
Schram Ben
Dawes Jay
Lockie Robert
Orr Robin
Impacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers: A systematic review
law enforcement
load carriage
accoutrements belt
load bearing vest
duty loads
occupational health
back injury
injury prevention
title Impacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers: A systematic review
title_full Impacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers: A systematic review
title_fullStr Impacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers: A systematic review
title_short Impacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers: A systematic review
title_sort impacts of duty belts and load placement on police officers a systematic review
topic law enforcement
load carriage
accoutrements belt
load bearing vest
duty loads
occupational health
back injury
injury prevention
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2024/0354-88722402067B.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bernernolan impactsofdutybeltsandloadplacementonpoliceofficersasystematicreview
AT biilmannchristopher impactsofdutybeltsandloadplacementonpoliceofficersasystematicreview
AT hunterdaniel impactsofdutybeltsandloadplacementonpoliceofficersasystematicreview
AT canettielisa impactsofdutybeltsandloadplacementonpoliceofficersasystematicreview
AT schramben impactsofdutybeltsandloadplacementonpoliceofficersasystematicreview
AT dawesjay impactsofdutybeltsandloadplacementonpoliceofficersasystematicreview
AT lockierobert impactsofdutybeltsandloadplacementonpoliceofficersasystematicreview
AT orrrobin impactsofdutybeltsandloadplacementonpoliceofficersasystematicreview