Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy

BackgroundDiabetic Macular Edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. Currently, the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) are used as the first line of DME treatment and corticosteroid implants are usually used as a second-line treatment. These im...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Public Health
Main Authors: Giovanna Elisa Calabrò, Michele Basile, Monica Varano, Filippo Amore, Roberto Ricciardi, Francesco Bandello, Americo Cicchetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.938987/full
_version_ 1852737382717063168
author Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
Michele Basile
Monica Varano
Filippo Amore
Roberto Ricciardi
Francesco Bandello
Americo Cicchetti
author_facet Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
Michele Basile
Monica Varano
Filippo Amore
Roberto Ricciardi
Francesco Bandello
Americo Cicchetti
author_sort Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Public Health
description BackgroundDiabetic Macular Edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. Currently, the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) are used as the first line of DME treatment and corticosteroid implants are usually used as a second-line treatment. These implants are a safe and effective therapeutic option that can improve the quality of life of DME patients by reducing the intravitreal injections number. We determined the economic impact related to DME, also from the social perspective, and the consequences of the increased use of the dexamethasone implant.MethodsThe analysis compares two scenarios: the first based on the current rate of recourse to the therapeutic alternatives available in the Italian healthcare setting (as is) and the second based on the assumption of an increased recourse to dexamethasone implants (to be). The results are expressed both in terms of the resource absorption associated with the two scenarios and in terms of the cost differential yielded by their comparison.ResultsThe increased use of the dexamethasone implant allows considerable savings in terms of healthcare professionals' time, follow-up and productivity lost by patients/caregivers. These savings would reduce healthcare costs for the management of DME patients in Italy by €2,058,238 in 5 years.ConclusionsTo optimize the healthcare resources allocation, it is necessary to implement treatments that yield not only cost reductions but also a clinical benefit for patients. The dexamethasone implant use is an example of DME management that generates value for patients, health system and society.
format Article
id doaj-art-2dcefcd2d0c3421fa8f53c2fc70a42a3
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2296-2565
language English
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-2dcefcd2d0c3421fa8f53c2fc70a42a32025-08-19T21:06:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652022-07-011010.3389/fpubh.2022.938987938987Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in ItalyGiovanna Elisa Calabrò0Giovanna Elisa Calabrò1Michele Basile2Monica Varano3Filippo Amore4Roberto Ricciardi5Francesco Bandello6Americo Cicchetti7Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyVIHTALI (Value in Health Technology and Academy for Leadership and Innovation), Spin-Off of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyGraduate School of Health Economics and Management (ALTEMS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyFondazione Bietti-IRCCS, Rome, ItalyIAPB Italia Onlus - Polo Nazionale di Servizi e Ricerca per la Prevenzione della Cecità e la Riabilitazione Visiva, Centro di Collaborazione Organizzazione Mondiale Sanità Presso Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, ItalyVIHTALI (Value in Health Technology and Academy for Leadership and Innovation), Spin-Off of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Milan, ItalyGraduate School of Health Economics and Management (ALTEMS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyBackgroundDiabetic Macular Edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. Currently, the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) are used as the first line of DME treatment and corticosteroid implants are usually used as a second-line treatment. These implants are a safe and effective therapeutic option that can improve the quality of life of DME patients by reducing the intravitreal injections number. We determined the economic impact related to DME, also from the social perspective, and the consequences of the increased use of the dexamethasone implant.MethodsThe analysis compares two scenarios: the first based on the current rate of recourse to the therapeutic alternatives available in the Italian healthcare setting (as is) and the second based on the assumption of an increased recourse to dexamethasone implants (to be). The results are expressed both in terms of the resource absorption associated with the two scenarios and in terms of the cost differential yielded by their comparison.ResultsThe increased use of the dexamethasone implant allows considerable savings in terms of healthcare professionals' time, follow-up and productivity lost by patients/caregivers. These savings would reduce healthcare costs for the management of DME patients in Italy by €2,058,238 in 5 years.ConclusionsTo optimize the healthcare resources allocation, it is necessary to implement treatments that yield not only cost reductions but also a clinical benefit for patients. The dexamethasone implant use is an example of DME management that generates value for patients, health system and society.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.938987/fulldiabetic macular edemaeconomic burdenintravitreal dexamethasone implantdirect costsindirect costs
spellingShingle Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
Michele Basile
Monica Varano
Filippo Amore
Roberto Ricciardi
Francesco Bandello
Americo Cicchetti
Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy
diabetic macular edema
economic burden
intravitreal dexamethasone implant
direct costs
indirect costs
title Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy
title_full Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy
title_fullStr Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy
title_short Economic Aspects in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy
title_sort economic aspects in the management of diabetic macular edema in italy
topic diabetic macular edema
economic burden
intravitreal dexamethasone implant
direct costs
indirect costs
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.938987/full
work_keys_str_mv AT giovannaelisacalabro economicaspectsinthemanagementofdiabeticmacularedemainitaly
AT giovannaelisacalabro economicaspectsinthemanagementofdiabeticmacularedemainitaly
AT michelebasile economicaspectsinthemanagementofdiabeticmacularedemainitaly
AT monicavarano economicaspectsinthemanagementofdiabeticmacularedemainitaly
AT filippoamore economicaspectsinthemanagementofdiabeticmacularedemainitaly
AT robertoricciardi economicaspectsinthemanagementofdiabeticmacularedemainitaly
AT francescobandello economicaspectsinthemanagementofdiabeticmacularedemainitaly
AT americocicchetti economicaspectsinthemanagementofdiabeticmacularedemainitaly