Using collagenase to treat Dupuytren’s disease: a hypothetical cost benefit analysis

**Background**: Dupuytren’s disease is a disorder of abnormal collagen production that may manifest in the palmar fascia. Treatment options vary according to clinical circumstances but surgical fasciectomy remains the gold standard. Collagenase, an enzyme produced by clostridium histolyticum (CCH),...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery
主要な著者: Ryan Livingston, Michael Wagels, Alicia Heald
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons 2019-03-01
オンライン・アクセス:https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v2i1.42
_version_ 1849464825818644480
author Ryan Livingston
Michael Wagels
Alicia Heald
author_facet Ryan Livingston
Michael Wagels
Alicia Heald
author_sort Ryan Livingston
collection DOAJ
container_title Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery
description **Background**: Dupuytren’s disease is a disorder of abnormal collagen production that may manifest in the palmar fascia. Treatment options vary according to clinical circumstances but surgical fasciectomy remains the gold standard. Collagenase, an enzyme produced by clostridium histolyticum (CCH), is a relatively new injection able to cleave collagen strands in vitro. While the drug is not yet available on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), its side effect profile and risk of recurrence are comparable to fasciectomy in appropriately selected patients. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the safety and cost-effectiveness of collagenase for the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease. **Method**: Twenty-five patients at our hospital received collagenase injections for treatment of their Dupuytren’s disease. Data from this cohort was compared to a hypothetical group extrapolated from the literature. **Results**: Surgical treatment, excluding outpatient visits, costs on average AU$5852 per patient and collagenase costs AU$1176 per patient (gross cost difference AU$4676). Moderating this cost difference by the effect of complications using the incremental cost effectiveness ratio, the cost saving is AU$1137.71 per unit decrease in complications with collagenase treatment. Surgical fasciectomy has a lower risk of recurrence than collagenase but costs up to AU$543 more for patients for whom the condition does not recur within five years of treatment. In our cohort, 25 patients had 31 cords injected with collagenase. All but two patients achieved full range of motion of their affected joint and 20 per cent sustained minor skin tears requiring dressings. **Conclusion**: This analysis suggests that the investment of public health funds in the treatment of suitable patients with collagenase should produce a substantial cost saving without increasing the risk of complications.
format Article
id doaj-art-2e8e4d2f3e774579b2d265d56ba29486
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2209-170X
language English
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-2e8e4d2f3e774579b2d265d56ba294862025-08-20T03:20:37ZengAustralian Society of Plastic SurgeonsAustralasian Journal of Plastic Surgery2209-170X2019-03-012110.34239/ajops.v2i1.42Using collagenase to treat Dupuytren’s disease: a hypothetical cost benefit analysisRyan LivingstonMichael WagelsAlicia Heald**Background**: Dupuytren’s disease is a disorder of abnormal collagen production that may manifest in the palmar fascia. Treatment options vary according to clinical circumstances but surgical fasciectomy remains the gold standard. Collagenase, an enzyme produced by clostridium histolyticum (CCH), is a relatively new injection able to cleave collagen strands in vitro. While the drug is not yet available on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), its side effect profile and risk of recurrence are comparable to fasciectomy in appropriately selected patients. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the safety and cost-effectiveness of collagenase for the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease. **Method**: Twenty-five patients at our hospital received collagenase injections for treatment of their Dupuytren’s disease. Data from this cohort was compared to a hypothetical group extrapolated from the literature. **Results**: Surgical treatment, excluding outpatient visits, costs on average AU$5852 per patient and collagenase costs AU$1176 per patient (gross cost difference AU$4676). Moderating this cost difference by the effect of complications using the incremental cost effectiveness ratio, the cost saving is AU$1137.71 per unit decrease in complications with collagenase treatment. Surgical fasciectomy has a lower risk of recurrence than collagenase but costs up to AU$543 more for patients for whom the condition does not recur within five years of treatment. In our cohort, 25 patients had 31 cords injected with collagenase. All but two patients achieved full range of motion of their affected joint and 20 per cent sustained minor skin tears requiring dressings. **Conclusion**: This analysis suggests that the investment of public health funds in the treatment of suitable patients with collagenase should produce a substantial cost saving without increasing the risk of complications.https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v2i1.42
spellingShingle Ryan Livingston
Michael Wagels
Alicia Heald
Using collagenase to treat Dupuytren’s disease: a hypothetical cost benefit analysis
title Using collagenase to treat Dupuytren’s disease: a hypothetical cost benefit analysis
title_full Using collagenase to treat Dupuytren’s disease: a hypothetical cost benefit analysis
title_fullStr Using collagenase to treat Dupuytren’s disease: a hypothetical cost benefit analysis
title_full_unstemmed Using collagenase to treat Dupuytren’s disease: a hypothetical cost benefit analysis
title_short Using collagenase to treat Dupuytren’s disease: a hypothetical cost benefit analysis
title_sort using collagenase to treat dupuytren s disease a hypothetical cost benefit analysis
url https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v2i1.42
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanlivingston usingcollagenasetotreatdupuytrensdiseaseahypotheticalcostbenefitanalysis
AT michaelwagels usingcollagenasetotreatdupuytrensdiseaseahypotheticalcostbenefitanalysis
AT aliciaheald usingcollagenasetotreatdupuytrensdiseaseahypotheticalcostbenefitanalysis