Comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis

Abstract Background The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers, a common, more serious chronic diabetes-related complication, is increasing. Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) constitutes an effective adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. Factors, such as poor glycemic control, ischemia, and infecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Main Authors: Qingling Chen, Minting Lu, Xueyan Liu, Yanmei Yu, Jiaying Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-10-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04298-z
_version_ 1849889008731029504
author Qingling Chen
Minting Lu
Xueyan Liu
Yanmei Yu
Jiaying Li
author_facet Qingling Chen
Minting Lu
Xueyan Liu
Yanmei Yu
Jiaying Li
author_sort Qingling Chen
collection DOAJ
container_title Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
description Abstract Background The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers, a common, more serious chronic diabetes-related complication, is increasing. Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) constitutes an effective adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. Factors, such as poor glycemic control, ischemia, and infection prolong wound healing time, and VSD products are expensive and unaffordable for many patients. Objective To compare the use of customized VSD and customized VSD in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Method This retrospective study included 83 patients with diabetic foot ulcers in customized VSD (n = 44) and VSD (n = 39) groups. Baseline data, efficacy after 14 days, total treatment efficiency, final outcome (28 days after treatment, healing rate), average treatment cost, and hospitalization (days) of the two groups were compared. Factors affecting wound healing were analyzed. Results No significant intergroup differences in the baseline data were detected (VSD vs. customized VAD, p > 0.05). Treatment efficacy was higher in the customized VSD group than in the VSD group after 14 days (p < 0.05), although total treatment efficiency in both groups reached 100%. The final outcome in the customized VSD group was better (vs. VSD group, p < 0.05), and the wound healing rate was higher than in the VSD group (66.7% vs. 33.3%). The mean treatment cost and hospital days were greater in the VSD group (vs. customized VSD group; p < 0.05). Factors affecting wound healing include age, Wagner classification, HDL-C, and fasting C-peptide. Younger age, low Wagner classification grade, low HDL-C level, and high fasting C-peptide contribute to higher healing rate, Conclusion Efficacy and final outcome of customized VSD were better than that of VSD; the customized VSD device is simple and convenient to operate, and enables cost-effective treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-2edff4e37d90400a994cb0b533a56a5c
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-2edff4e37d90400a994cb0b533a56a5c2025-08-20T01:04:58ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2023-10-011811810.1186/s13018-023-04298-zComparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysisQingling Chen0Minting Lu1Xueyan Liu2Yanmei Yu3Jiaying Li4Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversitySchool of Nursing, Jinan UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan UniversityAbstract Background The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers, a common, more serious chronic diabetes-related complication, is increasing. Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) constitutes an effective adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. Factors, such as poor glycemic control, ischemia, and infection prolong wound healing time, and VSD products are expensive and unaffordable for many patients. Objective To compare the use of customized VSD and customized VSD in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Method This retrospective study included 83 patients with diabetic foot ulcers in customized VSD (n = 44) and VSD (n = 39) groups. Baseline data, efficacy after 14 days, total treatment efficiency, final outcome (28 days after treatment, healing rate), average treatment cost, and hospitalization (days) of the two groups were compared. Factors affecting wound healing were analyzed. Results No significant intergroup differences in the baseline data were detected (VSD vs. customized VAD, p > 0.05). Treatment efficacy was higher in the customized VSD group than in the VSD group after 14 days (p < 0.05), although total treatment efficiency in both groups reached 100%. The final outcome in the customized VSD group was better (vs. VSD group, p < 0.05), and the wound healing rate was higher than in the VSD group (66.7% vs. 33.3%). The mean treatment cost and hospital days were greater in the VSD group (vs. customized VSD group; p < 0.05). Factors affecting wound healing include age, Wagner classification, HDL-C, and fasting C-peptide. Younger age, low Wagner classification grade, low HDL-C level, and high fasting C-peptide contribute to higher healing rate, Conclusion Efficacy and final outcome of customized VSD were better than that of VSD; the customized VSD device is simple and convenient to operate, and enables cost-effective treatment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04298-zDiabetic foot ulcersVacuum sealing drainageCustomized vacuum sealing drainageRetrospective analysis
spellingShingle Qingling Chen
Minting Lu
Xueyan Liu
Yanmei Yu
Jiaying Li
Comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis
Diabetic foot ulcers
Vacuum sealing drainage
Customized vacuum sealing drainage
Retrospective analysis
title Comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis
title_full Comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis
title_short Comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a retrospective analysis
title_sort comparison of customized vacuum sealing drainage and vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers a retrospective analysis
topic Diabetic foot ulcers
Vacuum sealing drainage
Customized vacuum sealing drainage
Retrospective analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04298-z
work_keys_str_mv AT qinglingchen comparisonofcustomizedvacuumsealingdrainageandvacuumsealingdrainageinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT mintinglu comparisonofcustomizedvacuumsealingdrainageandvacuumsealingdrainageinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT xueyanliu comparisonofcustomizedvacuumsealingdrainageandvacuumsealingdrainageinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yanmeiyu comparisonofcustomizedvacuumsealingdrainageandvacuumsealingdrainageinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersaretrospectiveanalysis
AT jiayingli comparisonofcustomizedvacuumsealingdrainageandvacuumsealingdrainageinthetreatmentofdiabeticfootulcersaretrospectiveanalysis