Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests

Traps are tools frequently used to monitor and control pests. Therefore, it is important to study the prerequisites of their use. The instant active area of a trap (the instantly available area of a trap that is able to capture a pest) is a determinant of trap efficacy. However, to measure the insta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant Protection Science
Main Authors: Jan Lukáš, Václav Stejskal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2003-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pps-200302-0002_computer-based-image-analysis-to-estimate-the-area-of-a-sticky-trap-occupied-or-contaminated-by-pests.php
_version_ 1852644625214341120
author Jan Lukáš
Václav Stejskal
author_facet Jan Lukáš
Václav Stejskal
author_sort Jan Lukáš
collection DOAJ
container_title Plant Protection Science
description Traps are tools frequently used to monitor and control pests. Therefore, it is important to study the prerequisites of their use. The instant active area of a trap (the instantly available area of a trap that is able to capture a pest) is a determinant of trap efficacy. However, to measure the instant active trap area is difficult. Therefore, we developed a technique of computer image analysis of digital photography to evaluate the instant active trap area, occupancy (area of insect bodies captured on the trap) and contamination (area of filth left by pests on the trap, such as wing-scales or faeces) of it. This study illustrates its use with two types of sticky traps applied to monitor the German cockroach, Blattella germanica, and the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella. We found that moths decreased the capacity of the sticky surface more than cockroaches because of its contamination by wing-scales. The sticky trap area covered by wing-scales was nearly as large as the area occupied by moth bodies. Cockroaches contaminated the sticky surface by their faeces but the contaminated area was less than 2% of the area occupied by cockroach bodies. The results indicate that moths are heavy contaminators while cockroaches are weak contaminators of sticky traps.
format Article
id doaj-art-32efb3b816bc4bd18521d377f2d4e041
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1212-2580
1805-9341
language English
publishDate 2003-06-01
publisher Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-32efb3b816bc4bd18521d377f2d4e0412025-08-19T21:43:28ZengCzech Academy of Agricultural SciencesPlant Protection Science1212-25801805-93412003-06-01392526010.17221/3826-PPSpps-200302-0002Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pestsJan Lukáš0Václav Stejskal1Department of Stored-Product Pest Control, Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech RepublicDepartment of Stored-Product Pest Control, Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech RepublicTraps are tools frequently used to monitor and control pests. Therefore, it is important to study the prerequisites of their use. The instant active area of a trap (the instantly available area of a trap that is able to capture a pest) is a determinant of trap efficacy. However, to measure the instant active trap area is difficult. Therefore, we developed a technique of computer image analysis of digital photography to evaluate the instant active trap area, occupancy (area of insect bodies captured on the trap) and contamination (area of filth left by pests on the trap, such as wing-scales or faeces) of it. This study illustrates its use with two types of sticky traps applied to monitor the German cockroach, Blattella germanica, and the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella. We found that moths decreased the capacity of the sticky surface more than cockroaches because of its contamination by wing-scales. The sticky trap area covered by wing-scales was nearly as large as the area occupied by moth bodies. Cockroaches contaminated the sticky surface by their faeces but the contaminated area was less than 2% of the area occupied by cockroach bodies. The results indicate that moths are heavy contaminators while cockroaches are weak contaminators of sticky traps.https://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pps-200302-0002_computer-based-image-analysis-to-estimate-the-area-of-a-sticky-trap-occupied-or-contaminated-by-pests.phpmonitoringtrapsdigital image analysisephestia kuehniellablattella germanica
spellingShingle Jan Lukáš
Václav Stejskal
Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests
monitoring
traps
digital image analysis
ephestia kuehniella
blattella germanica
title Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests
title_full Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests
title_fullStr Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests
title_full_unstemmed Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests
title_short Computer-based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests
title_sort computer based image analysis to estimate the area of a sticky trap occupied or contaminated by pests
topic monitoring
traps
digital image analysis
ephestia kuehniella
blattella germanica
url https://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/pps-200302-0002_computer-based-image-analysis-to-estimate-the-area-of-a-sticky-trap-occupied-or-contaminated-by-pests.php
work_keys_str_mv AT janlukas computerbasedimageanalysistoestimatetheareaofastickytrapoccupiedorcontaminatedbypests
AT vaclavstejskal computerbasedimageanalysistoestimatetheareaofastickytrapoccupiedorcontaminatedbypests