The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Background: Circulating vaccine derived poliovirus (cVDPV) outbreaks remain a threat to polio eradication. To reduce cases of polio from cVDPV of serotype 2, the serotype 2 component of the vaccine has been removed from the global vaccine supply, but outbreaks of cVDPV2 have continued. The objective...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:Gates Open Research
Main Authors: Megan Auzenbergs, Grace Macklin, Holly Fountain, Kathleen M O'Reilly, Hil Lyons
格式: Article
語言:英语
出版: F1000 Research Ltd 2023-04-01
主題:
在線閱讀:https://gatesopenresearch.org/articles/5-94/v3
_version_ 1851935351662182400
author Megan Auzenbergs
Grace Macklin
Holly Fountain
Kathleen M O'Reilly
Hil Lyons
author_facet Megan Auzenbergs
Grace Macklin
Holly Fountain
Kathleen M O'Reilly
Hil Lyons
author_sort Megan Auzenbergs
collection DOAJ
container_title Gates Open Research
description Background: Circulating vaccine derived poliovirus (cVDPV) outbreaks remain a threat to polio eradication. To reduce cases of polio from cVDPV of serotype 2, the serotype 2 component of the vaccine has been removed from the global vaccine supply, but outbreaks of cVDPV2 have continued. The objective of this work is to understand the factors associated with later detection in order to improve detection of these unwanted events. Methods: The number of nucleotide differences between each cVDPV outbreak and the oral polio vaccine (OPV) strain was used to approximate the time from emergence to detection. Only independent emergences were included in the analysis. Variables such as serotype, surveillance quality, and World Health Organization (WHO) region were tested in a negative binomial regression model to ascertain whether these variables were associated with higher nucleotide differences upon detection. Results: In total, 74 outbreaks were analysed from 24 countries between 2004-2019. For serotype 1 (n=10), the median time from seeding until outbreak detection was 572 (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 279-2016), for serotype 2 (n=59), 276 (95% UI 172-765) days, and for serotype 3 (n=5), 472 (95% UI 392-603) days. Significant improvement in the time to detection was found with increasing surveillance of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) and adequate stool collection. Conclusions: cVDPVs remain a risk; all WHO regions have reported at least one VDPV outbreak since the first outbreak in 2000 and outbreak response campaigns using monovalent OPV type 2 risk seeding future outbreaks. Maintaining surveillance for poliomyelitis after local elimination is essential to quickly respond to both emergence of VDPVs and potential importations as low-quality AFP surveillance causes outbreaks to continue undetected. Considerable variation in the time between emergence and detection of VDPVs were apparent, and other than surveillance quality and inclusion of environmental surveillance, the reasons for this remain unclear.
format Article
id doaj-art-33cfdca2f78b45bcaa238de33eafcc51
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2572-4754
language English
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-33cfdca2f78b45bcaa238de33eafcc512025-08-19T21:52:39ZengF1000 Research LtdGates Open Research2572-47542023-04-01510.12688/gatesopenres.13272.315943The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]Megan Auzenbergs0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1724-4485Grace Macklin1Holly Fountain2Kathleen M O'Reilly3Hil Lyons4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0325-006XCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UKCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UKCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UKCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UKInstitute for Disease Modeling, Bellevue, Washington, USABackground: Circulating vaccine derived poliovirus (cVDPV) outbreaks remain a threat to polio eradication. To reduce cases of polio from cVDPV of serotype 2, the serotype 2 component of the vaccine has been removed from the global vaccine supply, but outbreaks of cVDPV2 have continued. The objective of this work is to understand the factors associated with later detection in order to improve detection of these unwanted events. Methods: The number of nucleotide differences between each cVDPV outbreak and the oral polio vaccine (OPV) strain was used to approximate the time from emergence to detection. Only independent emergences were included in the analysis. Variables such as serotype, surveillance quality, and World Health Organization (WHO) region were tested in a negative binomial regression model to ascertain whether these variables were associated with higher nucleotide differences upon detection. Results: In total, 74 outbreaks were analysed from 24 countries between 2004-2019. For serotype 1 (n=10), the median time from seeding until outbreak detection was 572 (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 279-2016), for serotype 2 (n=59), 276 (95% UI 172-765) days, and for serotype 3 (n=5), 472 (95% UI 392-603) days. Significant improvement in the time to detection was found with increasing surveillance of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) and adequate stool collection. Conclusions: cVDPVs remain a risk; all WHO regions have reported at least one VDPV outbreak since the first outbreak in 2000 and outbreak response campaigns using monovalent OPV type 2 risk seeding future outbreaks. Maintaining surveillance for poliomyelitis after local elimination is essential to quickly respond to both emergence of VDPVs and potential importations as low-quality AFP surveillance causes outbreaks to continue undetected. Considerable variation in the time between emergence and detection of VDPVs were apparent, and other than surveillance quality and inclusion of environmental surveillance, the reasons for this remain unclear.https://gatesopenresearch.org/articles/5-94/v3polio vaccination eradication cVDPVs OPVeng
spellingShingle Megan Auzenbergs
Grace Macklin
Holly Fountain
Kathleen M O'Reilly
Hil Lyons
The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
polio
vaccination
eradication
cVDPVs
OPV
eng
title The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_full The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_fullStr The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_full_unstemmed The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_short The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
title_sort impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses version 3 peer review 2 approved 1 approved with reservations
topic polio
vaccination
eradication
cVDPVs
OPV
eng
url https://gatesopenresearch.org/articles/5-94/v3
work_keys_str_mv AT meganauzenbergs theimpactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT gracemacklin theimpactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT hollyfountain theimpactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT kathleenmoreilly theimpactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT hillyons theimpactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT meganauzenbergs impactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT gracemacklin impactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT hollyfountain impactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT kathleenmoreilly impactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations
AT hillyons impactofsurveillanceandotherfactorsondetectionofemergentandcirculatingvaccinederivedpoliovirusesversion3peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations