Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision

The arbitration decision by BPSK, can be filed with objections in accordance with Law 8/1999 and annulment under Law 30/1999. These two actions raise questions related to the arbitration process to resolve consumer disputes, consumer protection, and the impact of the Constitutional Court’s decision...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jurnal Konstitusi
Main Authors: Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri, Ratih Lestarini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2023-09-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2258
_version_ 1851859773577756672
author Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri
Ratih Lestarini
author_facet Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri
Ratih Lestarini
author_sort Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri
collection DOAJ
container_title Jurnal Konstitusi
description The arbitration decision by BPSK, can be filed with objections in accordance with Law 8/1999 and annulment under Law 30/1999. These two actions raise questions related to the arbitration process to resolve consumer disputes, consumer protection, and the impact of the Constitutional Court’s decision on the annulment of arbitration awards. This is because both actions are contrary to the final and binding nature of the arbitration award. Through the doctrinal research method, it was found that three years since the Constitutional Court’s Decision, there has been an increase in decisions related to the annulment of arbitration awards and objections to BPSK decisions. The Constitutional Court Decision has two contrary impacts. It makes easier for the aggrieved party in the process of resolving consumer disputes through arbitration to file for annulment or objection. Meanwhile, it also makes the process of consumer protection through arbitration lose its final and binding force.
format Article
id doaj-art-3971ec2fcbc149df96d02bc7e49dac06
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1829-7706
2548-1657
language English
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-3971ec2fcbc149df96d02bc7e49dac062025-08-19T22:21:03ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572023-09-0120340642210.31078/jk30331768Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court DecisionRizkisyabana Yulistyaputri0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6890-0625Ratih Lestarini1https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5867-6924Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaFaculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaThe arbitration decision by BPSK, can be filed with objections in accordance with Law 8/1999 and annulment under Law 30/1999. These two actions raise questions related to the arbitration process to resolve consumer disputes, consumer protection, and the impact of the Constitutional Court’s decision on the annulment of arbitration awards. This is because both actions are contrary to the final and binding nature of the arbitration award. Through the doctrinal research method, it was found that three years since the Constitutional Court’s Decision, there has been an increase in decisions related to the annulment of arbitration awards and objections to BPSK decisions. The Constitutional Court Decision has two contrary impacts. It makes easier for the aggrieved party in the process of resolving consumer disputes through arbitration to file for annulment or objection. Meanwhile, it also makes the process of consumer protection through arbitration lose its final and binding force.https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2258arbitrationbpskconsumer dispute
spellingShingle Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri
Ratih Lestarini
Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
arbitration
bpsk
consumer dispute
title Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
title_full Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
title_fullStr Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
title_full_unstemmed Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
title_short Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
title_sort consumer empowerment safeguarding consumer rights through bpsk s arbitration post the constitutional court decision
topic arbitration
bpsk
consumer dispute
url https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2258
work_keys_str_mv AT rizkisyabanayulistyaputri consumerempowermentsafeguardingconsumerrightsthroughbpsksarbitrationposttheconstitutionalcourtdecision
AT ratihlestarini consumerempowermentsafeguardingconsumerrightsthroughbpsksarbitrationposttheconstitutionalcourtdecision