Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision
The arbitration decision by BPSK, can be filed with objections in accordance with Law 8/1999 and annulment under Law 30/1999. These two actions raise questions related to the arbitration process to resolve consumer disputes, consumer protection, and the impact of the Constitutional Court’s decision...
| Published in: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2023-09-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2258 |
| _version_ | 1851859773577756672 |
|---|---|
| author | Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri Ratih Lestarini |
| author_facet | Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri Ratih Lestarini |
| author_sort | Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| description | The arbitration decision by BPSK, can be filed with objections in accordance with Law 8/1999 and annulment under Law 30/1999. These two actions raise questions related to the arbitration process to resolve consumer disputes, consumer protection, and the impact of the Constitutional Court’s decision on the annulment of arbitration awards. This is because both actions are contrary to the final and binding nature of the arbitration award. Through the doctrinal research method, it was found that three years since the Constitutional Court’s Decision, there has been an increase in decisions related to the annulment of arbitration awards and objections to BPSK decisions. The Constitutional Court Decision has two contrary impacts. It makes easier for the aggrieved party in the process of resolving consumer disputes through arbitration to file for annulment or objection. Meanwhile, it also makes the process of consumer protection through arbitration lose its final and binding force. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3971ec2fcbc149df96d02bc7e49dac06 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
| publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-3971ec2fcbc149df96d02bc7e49dac062025-08-19T22:21:03ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572023-09-0120340642210.31078/jk30331768Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court DecisionRizkisyabana Yulistyaputri0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6890-0625Ratih Lestarini1https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5867-6924Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaFaculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaThe arbitration decision by BPSK, can be filed with objections in accordance with Law 8/1999 and annulment under Law 30/1999. These two actions raise questions related to the arbitration process to resolve consumer disputes, consumer protection, and the impact of the Constitutional Court’s decision on the annulment of arbitration awards. This is because both actions are contrary to the final and binding nature of the arbitration award. Through the doctrinal research method, it was found that three years since the Constitutional Court’s Decision, there has been an increase in decisions related to the annulment of arbitration awards and objections to BPSK decisions. The Constitutional Court Decision has two contrary impacts. It makes easier for the aggrieved party in the process of resolving consumer disputes through arbitration to file for annulment or objection. Meanwhile, it also makes the process of consumer protection through arbitration lose its final and binding force.https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2258arbitrationbpskconsumer dispute |
| spellingShingle | Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri Ratih Lestarini Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision arbitration bpsk consumer dispute |
| title | Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision |
| title_full | Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision |
| title_fullStr | Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision |
| title_full_unstemmed | Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision |
| title_short | Consumer Empowerment: Safeguarding Consumer Rights Through BPSK’s Arbitration Post the Constitutional Court Decision |
| title_sort | consumer empowerment safeguarding consumer rights through bpsk s arbitration post the constitutional court decision |
| topic | arbitration bpsk consumer dispute |
| url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2258 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rizkisyabanayulistyaputri consumerempowermentsafeguardingconsumerrightsthroughbpsksarbitrationposttheconstitutionalcourtdecision AT ratihlestarini consumerempowermentsafeguardingconsumerrightsthroughbpsksarbitrationposttheconstitutionalcourtdecision |
