From ‘wild west’ to ‘responsible’ AI testing ‘in-the-wild’: lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in Europe

Although ‘in-the-wild’ technology testing provides an important opportunity to collect evidence about the performance of new technologies in real world deployment environments, such tests may themselves cause harm and wrongfully interfere with the rights of others. This paper critically examines rea...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Data & Policy
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Karen Yeung, Wenlong Li
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2632324925100199/type/journal_article
_version_ 1848993455204728832
author Karen Yeung
Wenlong Li
author_facet Karen Yeung
Wenlong Li
author_sort Karen Yeung
collection DOAJ
container_title Data & Policy
description Although ‘in-the-wild’ technology testing provides an important opportunity to collect evidence about the performance of new technologies in real world deployment environments, such tests may themselves cause harm and wrongfully interfere with the rights of others. This paper critically examines real-world AI testing, focusing on live facial recognition technology (FRT) trials by European law enforcement agencies (in London, Wales, Berlin, and Nice) undertaken between 2016 and 2020, which serve as a set of comparative case studies. We argue that there is an urgent need for a clear framework of principles to govern real-world AI testing, which is currently a largely ungoverned ‘wild west’ without adequate safeguards or oversight. We propose a principled framework to ensure that these tests are undertaken in an epistemically, ethically, and legally responsible manner, thereby helping to ensure that such tests generate sound, reliable evidence while safeguarding the human rights and other vital interests of others. Although the case studies of FRT testing were undertaken prior to the passage of the EU’s AI Act, we suggest that these three kinds of responsibility should provide the foundational anchor points to inform the design and conduct of real-world testing of high-risk AI systems pursuant to Article 60 of the AI Act.
format Article
id doaj-art-3c2a233c76cc4da79bc8d3c8697f5f0e
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2632-3249
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-3c2a233c76cc4da79bc8d3c8697f5f0e2025-09-19T07:52:18ZengCambridge University PressData & Policy2632-32492025-01-01710.1017/dap.2025.10019From ‘wild west’ to ‘responsible’ AI testing ‘in-the-wild’: lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in EuropeKaren Yeung0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-8134Wenlong Li1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2574-1847Interdisciplinary Professorial Fellow in Law, Ethics and Informatics, Birmingham Law School & School of Computer Science, https://ror.org/03angcq70University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKResearch Professor, Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University, ChinaAlthough ‘in-the-wild’ technology testing provides an important opportunity to collect evidence about the performance of new technologies in real world deployment environments, such tests may themselves cause harm and wrongfully interfere with the rights of others. This paper critically examines real-world AI testing, focusing on live facial recognition technology (FRT) trials by European law enforcement agencies (in London, Wales, Berlin, and Nice) undertaken between 2016 and 2020, which serve as a set of comparative case studies. We argue that there is an urgent need for a clear framework of principles to govern real-world AI testing, which is currently a largely ungoverned ‘wild west’ without adequate safeguards or oversight. We propose a principled framework to ensure that these tests are undertaken in an epistemically, ethically, and legally responsible manner, thereby helping to ensure that such tests generate sound, reliable evidence while safeguarding the human rights and other vital interests of others. Although the case studies of FRT testing were undertaken prior to the passage of the EU’s AI Act, we suggest that these three kinds of responsibility should provide the foundational anchor points to inform the design and conduct of real-world testing of high-risk AI systems pursuant to Article 60 of the AI Act.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2632324925100199/type/journal_articletechnology testingFacial Recognition Technology (FRT)in-the-wild triallaw enforcementAI testing
spellingShingle Karen Yeung
Wenlong Li
From ‘wild west’ to ‘responsible’ AI testing ‘in-the-wild’: lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in Europe
technology testing
Facial Recognition Technology (FRT)
in-the-wild trial
law enforcement
AI testing
title From ‘wild west’ to ‘responsible’ AI testing ‘in-the-wild’: lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in Europe
title_full From ‘wild west’ to ‘responsible’ AI testing ‘in-the-wild’: lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in Europe
title_fullStr From ‘wild west’ to ‘responsible’ AI testing ‘in-the-wild’: lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in Europe
title_full_unstemmed From ‘wild west’ to ‘responsible’ AI testing ‘in-the-wild’: lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in Europe
title_short From ‘wild west’ to ‘responsible’ AI testing ‘in-the-wild’: lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in Europe
title_sort from wild west to responsible ai testing in the wild lessons from live facial recognition testing by law enforcement authorities in europe
topic technology testing
Facial Recognition Technology (FRT)
in-the-wild trial
law enforcement
AI testing
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2632324925100199/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT karenyeung fromwildwesttoresponsibleaitestinginthewildlessonsfromlivefacialrecognitiontestingbylawenforcementauthoritiesineurope
AT wenlongli fromwildwesttoresponsibleaitestinginthewildlessonsfromlivefacialrecognitiontestingbylawenforcementauthoritiesineurope