Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Digestate Treatment after Anaerobic Digestion Process
In this study, the impact of digestate treatment after Anaerobic Digestion (AD) process in two scenarios is analyzed in the case of an industrial diary unit in the United States. The first scenario involves production of liquid fertilizer and compost, while the second scenario lacks such a treatment...
| Published in: | Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Materials and Energy Research Center (MERC)
2023-08-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.jree.ir/article_158808_20e9ba3f1e67969cbd2c3df10855625b.pdf |
| _version_ | 1850136519535230976 |
|---|---|
| author | Ali Nazari Morteza Hosseinpour Mahdi Rezaei |
| author_facet | Ali Nazari Morteza Hosseinpour Mahdi Rezaei |
| author_sort | Ali Nazari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment |
| description | In this study, the impact of digestate treatment after Anaerobic Digestion (AD) process in two scenarios is analyzed in the case of an industrial diary unit in the United States. The first scenario involves production of liquid fertilizer and compost, while the second scenario lacks such a treatment process. Aspen Plus is used to simulate the AD process and evaluate the general properties of biogas and digestate. The results of technical analysis show insignificant changes in the net power production from the CHP unit in Scenario 1. The economic analysis, however, indicates the necessity of digestate treatment for AD systems to be profitable. Furthermore, the results of environmental analysis indicate the mitigation of about 93.4 kilotonnes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Scenario 1, while AD in Scenario 2 saves only 12 kilotonnes of GHG emissions. In other words, digestate treatment has a more significant environmental impact than the power production and its profitability from CHP unit. The reason could be attributed to the enormous consumption of energy during the production of chemical fertilizers where the digestate treatment process (scenario 1) offsets the utilization of chemical fertilizers in the agriculture industry. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3c36e338bbaf4bbebe8d1c73cfb4bf05 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2423-5547 2423-7469 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
| publisher | Materials and Energy Research Center (MERC) |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-3c36e338bbaf4bbebe8d1c73cfb4bf052025-08-19T23:50:50ZengMaterials and Energy Research Center (MERC)Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment2423-55472423-74692023-08-01103515810.30501/jree.2022.347330.1390158808Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Digestate Treatment after Anaerobic Digestion ProcessAli Nazari0Morteza Hosseinpour1Mahdi Rezaei2Department of Renewable Energy Research, Niroo Research Institute (NRI), Tehran, Iran.Department of Renewable Energy Research, Niroo Research Institute (NRI), Tehran, Iran.Department of Renewable Energy Research, Niroo Research Institute (NRI), Tehran, Iran.In this study, the impact of digestate treatment after Anaerobic Digestion (AD) process in two scenarios is analyzed in the case of an industrial diary unit in the United States. The first scenario involves production of liquid fertilizer and compost, while the second scenario lacks such a treatment process. Aspen Plus is used to simulate the AD process and evaluate the general properties of biogas and digestate. The results of technical analysis show insignificant changes in the net power production from the CHP unit in Scenario 1. The economic analysis, however, indicates the necessity of digestate treatment for AD systems to be profitable. Furthermore, the results of environmental analysis indicate the mitigation of about 93.4 kilotonnes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Scenario 1, while AD in Scenario 2 saves only 12 kilotonnes of GHG emissions. In other words, digestate treatment has a more significant environmental impact than the power production and its profitability from CHP unit. The reason could be attributed to the enormous consumption of energy during the production of chemical fertilizers where the digestate treatment process (scenario 1) offsets the utilization of chemical fertilizers in the agriculture industry.https://www.jree.ir/article_158808_20e9ba3f1e67969cbd2c3df10855625b.pdfanaerobic digestionbiogassustainabilityliquid dairy manureaspen plus |
| spellingShingle | Ali Nazari Morteza Hosseinpour Mahdi Rezaei Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Digestate Treatment after Anaerobic Digestion Process anaerobic digestion biogas sustainability liquid dairy manure aspen plus |
| title | Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Digestate Treatment after Anaerobic Digestion Process |
| title_full | Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Digestate Treatment after Anaerobic Digestion Process |
| title_fullStr | Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Digestate Treatment after Anaerobic Digestion Process |
| title_full_unstemmed | Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Digestate Treatment after Anaerobic Digestion Process |
| title_short | Techno-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Digestate Treatment after Anaerobic Digestion Process |
| title_sort | techno economic and environmental analyses of digestate treatment after anaerobic digestion process |
| topic | anaerobic digestion biogas sustainability liquid dairy manure aspen plus |
| url | https://www.jree.ir/article_158808_20e9ba3f1e67969cbd2c3df10855625b.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alinazari technoeconomicandenvironmentalanalysesofdigestatetreatmentafteranaerobicdigestionprocess AT mortezahosseinpour technoeconomicandenvironmentalanalysesofdigestatetreatmentafteranaerobicdigestionprocess AT mahdirezaei technoeconomicandenvironmentalanalysesofdigestatetreatmentafteranaerobicdigestionprocess |
