Strategies for wild pig control: A case study of Missouri's progress towards elimination
Abstract We examined the evolution of wild pig (Sus scrofa) elimination efforts in Missouri, USA, to identify governance and management strategies that may be applicable in other contexts. In 2023, we interviewed 37 individuals from 15 agencies and organizations in Missouri to describe Missouri'...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Wiley
2025-09-01
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1607 |
| _version_ | 1849290204086534144 |
|---|---|
| author | Megan M. Cross Keith M. Carlisle |
| author_facet | Megan M. Cross Keith M. Carlisle |
| author_sort | Megan M. Cross |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| description | Abstract We examined the evolution of wild pig (Sus scrofa) elimination efforts in Missouri, USA, to identify governance and management strategies that may be applicable in other contexts. In 2023, we interviewed 37 individuals from 15 agencies and organizations in Missouri to describe Missouri's path towards wild pig elimination, including the coalitions, policies, and collaborative structures foundational to control efforts, and identify the key management strategies and methods central to progress. Study methods also encompassed observation and document analysis, and data indicated that the adoption of a broad partnership and implementation of a unified Incident Command System enhanced wild pig control efforts by facilitating collaborative decision‐making and coordination across multiple organizations. Furthermore, several management practices emerged as instrumental in advancing elimination efforts. Management actions included systematic baiting, the employment of full‐time trapping professionals and University Extension outreach specialists, the establishment of a centralized hotline for reporting wild pig sightings and damage, integration of drone and helicopter operations, and the development of a program to provide private landowners free access to damage mitigation tools. Our study highlights the practices contributing to Missouri's pursuit of wild pig elimination and suggests their potential transferability to other situations where wild pig population control is a management priority. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-3ca9d508752b4e30a5d59cd7a075d35e |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2328-5540 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-09-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-3ca9d508752b4e30a5d59cd7a075d35e2025-09-08T05:09:57ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402025-09-01493n/an/a10.1002/wsb.1607Strategies for wild pig control: A case study of Missouri's progress towards eliminationMegan M. Cross0Keith M. Carlisle1USDA‐APHIS‐Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center 4101 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins 80521 CO USAUSDA‐APHIS‐Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center 4101 Laporte Avenue Fort Collins 80521 CO USAAbstract We examined the evolution of wild pig (Sus scrofa) elimination efforts in Missouri, USA, to identify governance and management strategies that may be applicable in other contexts. In 2023, we interviewed 37 individuals from 15 agencies and organizations in Missouri to describe Missouri's path towards wild pig elimination, including the coalitions, policies, and collaborative structures foundational to control efforts, and identify the key management strategies and methods central to progress. Study methods also encompassed observation and document analysis, and data indicated that the adoption of a broad partnership and implementation of a unified Incident Command System enhanced wild pig control efforts by facilitating collaborative decision‐making and coordination across multiple organizations. Furthermore, several management practices emerged as instrumental in advancing elimination efforts. Management actions included systematic baiting, the employment of full‐time trapping professionals and University Extension outreach specialists, the establishment of a centralized hotline for reporting wild pig sightings and damage, integration of drone and helicopter operations, and the development of a program to provide private landowners free access to damage mitigation tools. Our study highlights the practices contributing to Missouri's pursuit of wild pig elimination and suggests their potential transferability to other situations where wild pig population control is a management priority.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1607collaborative governancedamage managementferal swineIncident Command Systemsinvasive species managementSus scrofa |
| spellingShingle | Megan M. Cross Keith M. Carlisle Strategies for wild pig control: A case study of Missouri's progress towards elimination collaborative governance damage management feral swine Incident Command Systems invasive species management Sus scrofa |
| title | Strategies for wild pig control: A case study of Missouri's progress towards elimination |
| title_full | Strategies for wild pig control: A case study of Missouri's progress towards elimination |
| title_fullStr | Strategies for wild pig control: A case study of Missouri's progress towards elimination |
| title_full_unstemmed | Strategies for wild pig control: A case study of Missouri's progress towards elimination |
| title_short | Strategies for wild pig control: A case study of Missouri's progress towards elimination |
| title_sort | strategies for wild pig control a case study of missouri s progress towards elimination |
| topic | collaborative governance damage management feral swine Incident Command Systems invasive species management Sus scrofa |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1607 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT meganmcross strategiesforwildpigcontrolacasestudyofmissourisprogresstowardselimination AT keithmcarlisle strategiesforwildpigcontrolacasestudyofmissourisprogresstowardselimination |
