Experimental Investigation of Added Resistance of a Ship using a Hydroelastic Body in Waves
Ship resistance is an important characteristic to predict in the preliminary design stage. Proper prediction of ship resistance implies the fulfillment of the required speed and power of a ship. The assumed body characteristics of a ship model should also be properly considered when investigatin...
| 出版年: | International Journal of Technology |
|---|---|
| 主要な著者: | , , , , |
| フォーマット: | 論文 |
| 言語: | 英語 |
| 出版事項: |
Universitas Indonesia
2022-04-01
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン・アクセス: | https://ijtech.eng.ui.ac.id/article/view/4904 |
| 要約: | Ship resistance is an important
characteristic to predict in the preliminary design stage. Proper prediction of
ship resistance implies the fulfillment of the required speed and power of a
ship. The assumed body characteristics of a ship model should also be properly
considered when investigating ship resistance. In the present study, the
assumption of a hydroelastic body for a ship model was used in an experiment on
total ship resistance and added resistance in calm water and waves. Two
hydroelastic models were used: a hydroelastic body with a bulbous bow (HB) and
a hydroelastic body without a bulbous bow (HWB). The wavelength considered
ranged from 0.5 L to 1.3 L, and the Froude number (Fn) considered ranged from
0.058 to 0.232. In the presented results, the total resistance coefficient of
the HWB was higher than that of a rigid body without a bulbous bow (RWB). The average
difference of magnitude between the HWB and RWB was 30.49% for calm water
conditions and 30.37% for overall wave conditions. The total resistance of the
HB was higher than that of the rigid body with a bulbous bow (RB), and the
difference of magnitude was approximately 31.47% for calm water conditions and
31.68% for overall wave conditions. The added resistance coefficient of the HWB
tended to increase with an increase in the wavelength, from 0.5 L to 1.1 L, and
then decrease until 1.5 L. The overall tendency of the added resistance
coefficient of the HB was significantly different from the other numerical
results. Although the tendencies were different, most of the presented results
were in the same range as the other numerical results. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2086-9614 2087-2100 |
