Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) may improve survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of ERFA in combination with biliary stent placement...
| Published in: | Journal of International Medical Research |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2023-12-01
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231220825 |
| _version_ | 1850126283587977216 |
|---|---|
| author | Chenming Liu Jiaming Dong Yuxing Liu Siyuan Zhang Ruanchang Chen Haijun Tang |
| author_facet | Chenming Liu Jiaming Dong Yuxing Liu Siyuan Zhang Ruanchang Chen Haijun Tang |
| author_sort | Chenming Liu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Journal of International Medical Research |
| description | Objective Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) may improve survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of ERFA in combination with biliary stent placement for the treatment of MBO. Methods The study was registered in INPLASY (number 202340096). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to April 2023. We selected studies comparing the efficacy of ERFA plus stent placement with stent placement alone. The primary outcomes were pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival and stent patency; the secondary outcomes were the odds ratios (ORs) for adverse events. Results Eleven studies (four randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed a difference in survival time between the two groups (HR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.73, I 2 = 40%). However, there were no differences in the duration of stent patency or the incidence of adverse events (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84–1.29, I 2 = 46%; OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02–1.96, I 2 = 29%). Conclusions ERFA has a significant survival benefit for MBO, but does not increase the risk of adverse events. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-46e893bef4bf4e38be23a160f1c2acea |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1473-2300 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-46e893bef4bf4e38be23a160f1c2acea2025-08-19T23:54:17ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research1473-23002023-12-015110.1177/03000605231220825Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysisChenming LiuJiaming DongYuxing LiuSiyuan ZhangRuanchang ChenHaijun TangObjective Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) may improve survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of ERFA in combination with biliary stent placement for the treatment of MBO. Methods The study was registered in INPLASY (number 202340096). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to April 2023. We selected studies comparing the efficacy of ERFA plus stent placement with stent placement alone. The primary outcomes were pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival and stent patency; the secondary outcomes were the odds ratios (ORs) for adverse events. Results Eleven studies (four randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed a difference in survival time between the two groups (HR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.73, I 2 = 40%). However, there were no differences in the duration of stent patency or the incidence of adverse events (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84–1.29, I 2 = 46%; OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02–1.96, I 2 = 29%). Conclusions ERFA has a significant survival benefit for MBO, but does not increase the risk of adverse events.https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231220825 |
| spellingShingle | Chenming Liu Jiaming Dong Yuxing Liu Siyuan Zhang Ruanchang Chen Haijun Tang Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title | Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full | Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_short | Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title_sort | is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction a systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231220825 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chenmingliu isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiamingdong isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuxingliu isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT siyuanzhang isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ruanchangchen isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haijuntang isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
