Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) may improve survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of ERFA in combination with biliary stent placement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of International Medical Research
Main Authors: Chenming Liu, Jiaming Dong, Yuxing Liu, Siyuan Zhang, Ruanchang Chen, Haijun Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-12-01
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231220825
_version_ 1850126283587977216
author Chenming Liu
Jiaming Dong
Yuxing Liu
Siyuan Zhang
Ruanchang Chen
Haijun Tang
author_facet Chenming Liu
Jiaming Dong
Yuxing Liu
Siyuan Zhang
Ruanchang Chen
Haijun Tang
author_sort Chenming Liu
collection DOAJ
container_title Journal of International Medical Research
description Objective Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) may improve survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of ERFA in combination with biliary stent placement for the treatment of MBO. Methods The study was registered in INPLASY (number 202340096). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to April 2023. We selected studies comparing the efficacy of ERFA plus stent placement with stent placement alone. The primary outcomes were pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival and stent patency; the secondary outcomes were the odds ratios (ORs) for adverse events. Results Eleven studies (four randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed a difference in survival time between the two groups (HR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.73, I 2  = 40%). However, there were no differences in the duration of stent patency or the incidence of adverse events (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84–1.29, I 2  = 46%; OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02–1.96, I 2  = 29%). Conclusions ERFA has a significant survival benefit for MBO, but does not increase the risk of adverse events.
format Article
id doaj-art-46e893bef4bf4e38be23a160f1c2acea
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1473-2300
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-46e893bef4bf4e38be23a160f1c2acea2025-08-19T23:54:17ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research1473-23002023-12-015110.1177/03000605231220825Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysisChenming LiuJiaming DongYuxing LiuSiyuan ZhangRuanchang ChenHaijun TangObjective Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) may improve survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of ERFA in combination with biliary stent placement for the treatment of MBO. Methods The study was registered in INPLASY (number 202340096). The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to April 2023. We selected studies comparing the efficacy of ERFA plus stent placement with stent placement alone. The primary outcomes were pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival and stent patency; the secondary outcomes were the odds ratios (ORs) for adverse events. Results Eleven studies (four randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed a difference in survival time between the two groups (HR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.73, I 2  = 40%). However, there were no differences in the duration of stent patency or the incidence of adverse events (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84–1.29, I 2  = 46%; OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02–1.96, I 2  = 29%). Conclusions ERFA has a significant survival benefit for MBO, but does not increase the risk of adverse events.https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231220825
spellingShingle Chenming Liu
Jiaming Dong
Yuxing Liu
Siyuan Zhang
Ruanchang Chen
Haijun Tang
Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stent placement superior to stent placement alone for the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231220825
work_keys_str_mv AT chenmingliu isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiamingdong isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuxingliu isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT siyuanzhang isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ruanchangchen isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haijuntang isendoscopicradiofrequencyablationplusstentplacementsuperiortostentplacementaloneforthetreatmentofmalignantbiliaryobstructionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis