Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Altered tibiofemoral contact forces represent a risk factor for osteoarthritis onset and progression, making optimization of the knee force distribution a target of treatment strategies. Musculoskeletal model-based simulations are a state-of-the-art method to estimate joint contact forces, but they...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Sensors
主要な著者: Giacomo Di Raimondo, Miel Willems, Bryce Adrian Killen, Sara Havashinezhadian, Katia Turcot, Benedicte Vanwanseele, Ilse Jonkers
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/9/4484
_version_ 1849902666682990592
author Giacomo Di Raimondo
Miel Willems
Bryce Adrian Killen
Sara Havashinezhadian
Katia Turcot
Benedicte Vanwanseele
Ilse Jonkers
author_facet Giacomo Di Raimondo
Miel Willems
Bryce Adrian Killen
Sara Havashinezhadian
Katia Turcot
Benedicte Vanwanseele
Ilse Jonkers
author_sort Giacomo Di Raimondo
collection DOAJ
container_title Sensors
description Altered tibiofemoral contact forces represent a risk factor for osteoarthritis onset and progression, making optimization of the knee force distribution a target of treatment strategies. Musculoskeletal model-based simulations are a state-of-the-art method to estimate joint contact forces, but they typically require laboratory-based input and skilled operators. To overcome these limitations, ambulatory methods, relying on inertial measurement units, have been proposed to estimated ground reaction forces and, consequently, knee contact forces out-of-the-lab. This study proposes the use of a full inertial-capture-based musculoskeletal modelling workflow with an underlying probabilistic principal component analysis model trained on 1787 gait cycles in patients with knee osteoarthritis. As validation, five patients with knee osteoarthritis were instrumented with 17 inertial measurement units and 76 opto-reflective markers. Participants performed multiple overground walking trials while motion and inertial capture methods were synchronously recorded. Moderate to strong correlations were found for the inertial capture-based knee contact forces compared to motion capture with root mean square error between 0.15 and 0.40 of body weight. The results show that our workflow can inform and potentially assist clinical practitioners to monitor knee joint loading in physical therapy sessions and eventually assess long-term therapeutic effects in a clinical context.
format Article
id doaj-art-4a5d34656df145878efb59e2a96d3fb2
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1424-8220
language English
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-4a5d34656df145878efb59e2a96d3fb22025-08-20T00:58:43ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-05-01239448410.3390/s23094484Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee OsteoarthritisGiacomo Di Raimondo0Miel Willems1Bryce Adrian Killen2Sara Havashinezhadian3Katia Turcot4Benedicte Vanwanseele5Ilse Jonkers6Department of Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumDepartment of Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumDepartment of Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumDepartment of Kinesiology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaDepartment of Kinesiology, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, CanadaDepartment of Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumDepartment of Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, BelgiumAltered tibiofemoral contact forces represent a risk factor for osteoarthritis onset and progression, making optimization of the knee force distribution a target of treatment strategies. Musculoskeletal model-based simulations are a state-of-the-art method to estimate joint contact forces, but they typically require laboratory-based input and skilled operators. To overcome these limitations, ambulatory methods, relying on inertial measurement units, have been proposed to estimated ground reaction forces and, consequently, knee contact forces out-of-the-lab. This study proposes the use of a full inertial-capture-based musculoskeletal modelling workflow with an underlying probabilistic principal component analysis model trained on 1787 gait cycles in patients with knee osteoarthritis. As validation, five patients with knee osteoarthritis were instrumented with 17 inertial measurement units and 76 opto-reflective markers. Participants performed multiple overground walking trials while motion and inertial capture methods were synchronously recorded. Moderate to strong correlations were found for the inertial capture-based knee contact forces compared to motion capture with root mean square error between 0.15 and 0.40 of body weight. The results show that our workflow can inform and potentially assist clinical practitioners to monitor knee joint loading in physical therapy sessions and eventually assess long-term therapeutic effects in a clinical context.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/9/4484knee osteoarthritisknee contact forceswearable sensorsIMUmusculoskeletal modellingOpenSim
spellingShingle Giacomo Di Raimondo
Miel Willems
Bryce Adrian Killen
Sara Havashinezhadian
Katia Turcot
Benedicte Vanwanseele
Ilse Jonkers
Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
knee osteoarthritis
knee contact forces
wearable sensors
IMU
musculoskeletal modelling
OpenSim
title Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
title_full Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
title_short Peak Tibiofemoral Contact Forces Estimated Using IMU-Based Approaches Are Not Significantly Different from Motion Capture-Based Estimations in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis
title_sort peak tibiofemoral contact forces estimated using imu based approaches are not significantly different from motion capture based estimations in patients with knee osteoarthritis
topic knee osteoarthritis
knee contact forces
wearable sensors
IMU
musculoskeletal modelling
OpenSim
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/9/4484
work_keys_str_mv AT giacomodiraimondo peaktibiofemoralcontactforcesestimatedusingimubasedapproachesarenotsignificantlydifferentfrommotioncapturebasedestimationsinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritis
AT mielwillems peaktibiofemoralcontactforcesestimatedusingimubasedapproachesarenotsignificantlydifferentfrommotioncapturebasedestimationsinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritis
AT bryceadriankillen peaktibiofemoralcontactforcesestimatedusingimubasedapproachesarenotsignificantlydifferentfrommotioncapturebasedestimationsinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritis
AT sarahavashinezhadian peaktibiofemoralcontactforcesestimatedusingimubasedapproachesarenotsignificantlydifferentfrommotioncapturebasedestimationsinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritis
AT katiaturcot peaktibiofemoralcontactforcesestimatedusingimubasedapproachesarenotsignificantlydifferentfrommotioncapturebasedestimationsinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritis
AT benedictevanwanseele peaktibiofemoralcontactforcesestimatedusingimubasedapproachesarenotsignificantlydifferentfrommotioncapturebasedestimationsinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritis
AT ilsejonkers peaktibiofemoralcontactforcesestimatedusingimubasedapproachesarenotsignificantlydifferentfrommotioncapturebasedestimationsinpatientswithkneeosteoarthritis