Comparison of efficacy of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides: Effect of active ingredients, type of formulation and commercial suppliers
The lack of a standardized protocol makes it difficult to compare studies on the efficacy of commercial rodenticides. To contribute to the knowledge of pest control technology, we compared the efficacy of 17 commercial baits with different active ingredients and types of formulation from various com...
| 出版年: | Cogent Food & Agriculture |
|---|---|
| 主要な著者: | , |
| フォーマット: | 論文 |
| 言語: | 英語 |
| 出版事項: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2018-01-01
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン・アクセス: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1525147 |
| _version_ | 1852717916012675072 |
|---|---|
| author | Olga V. Suárez Gerardo R. Cueto |
| author_facet | Olga V. Suárez Gerardo R. Cueto |
| author_sort | Olga V. Suárez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Cogent Food & Agriculture |
| description | The lack of a standardized protocol makes it difficult to compare studies on the efficacy of commercial rodenticides. To contribute to the knowledge of pest control technology, we compared the efficacy of 17 commercial baits with different active ingredients and types of formulation from various commercial suppliers, using a standardized efficacy protocol under laboratory conditions. All rats died in all experimental groups. First deaths occurred 3 days after the beginning of the trial; average survival varied between 4.17 ± 0.12 days (difethialone wax blocks) and 5.96 ± 0.35 days (difenacoum pellets). Results showed no consistent pattern of time to death according to active ingredient and type of formulation. For bromadiolone-based baits, the grains induced significantly shorter time to death than wax blocks and the individuals fed on wax blocks varied the consumption rate according to the commercial supplier, while those consuming grains showed more homogeneous values. Our results show that although mortality was 100% efficacy differed among baits. These differences could be explained by the combination of the formulation type and commercial supplier rather than by the active ingredient itself. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4a6a11f439ba41cbb5e2ebbf80c72e9a |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2331-1932 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-4a6a11f439ba41cbb5e2ebbf80c72e9a2025-08-19T21:13:44ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Food & Agriculture2331-19322018-01-014110.1080/23311932.2018.15251471525147Comparison of efficacy of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides: Effect of active ingredients, type of formulation and commercial suppliersOlga V. Suárez0Gerardo R. Cueto1Universidad de Buenos AiresUniversidad de Buenos AiresThe lack of a standardized protocol makes it difficult to compare studies on the efficacy of commercial rodenticides. To contribute to the knowledge of pest control technology, we compared the efficacy of 17 commercial baits with different active ingredients and types of formulation from various commercial suppliers, using a standardized efficacy protocol under laboratory conditions. All rats died in all experimental groups. First deaths occurred 3 days after the beginning of the trial; average survival varied between 4.17 ± 0.12 days (difethialone wax blocks) and 5.96 ± 0.35 days (difenacoum pellets). Results showed no consistent pattern of time to death according to active ingredient and type of formulation. For bromadiolone-based baits, the grains induced significantly shorter time to death than wax blocks and the individuals fed on wax blocks varied the consumption rate according to the commercial supplier, while those consuming grains showed more homogeneous values. Our results show that although mortality was 100% efficacy differed among baits. These differences could be explained by the combination of the formulation type and commercial supplier rather than by the active ingredient itself.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1525147rodent controlrodenticide baitssecond-generation anticoagulantsactive ingredientslaboratory evaluation |
| spellingShingle | Olga V. Suárez Gerardo R. Cueto Comparison of efficacy of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides: Effect of active ingredients, type of formulation and commercial suppliers rodent control rodenticide baits second-generation anticoagulants active ingredients laboratory evaluation |
| title | Comparison of efficacy of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides: Effect of active ingredients, type of formulation and commercial suppliers |
| title_full | Comparison of efficacy of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides: Effect of active ingredients, type of formulation and commercial suppliers |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of efficacy of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides: Effect of active ingredients, type of formulation and commercial suppliers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of efficacy of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides: Effect of active ingredients, type of formulation and commercial suppliers |
| title_short | Comparison of efficacy of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides: Effect of active ingredients, type of formulation and commercial suppliers |
| title_sort | comparison of efficacy of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides effect of active ingredients type of formulation and commercial suppliers |
| topic | rodent control rodenticide baits second-generation anticoagulants active ingredients laboratory evaluation |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1525147 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT olgavsuarez comparisonofefficacyofsecondgenerationanticoagulantrodenticideseffectofactiveingredientstypeofformulationandcommercialsuppliers AT gerardorcueto comparisonofefficacyofsecondgenerationanticoagulantrodenticideseffectofactiveingredientstypeofformulationandcommercialsuppliers |
