Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship
Currently, the RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes) method is widely recognized as a prevalent approach for computing ship maneuvering forces and moments. Obtaining hydrodynamic derivatives using pure RANS is time-consuming, especially with rotating propellers. A reasonable simplification of the p...
| Published in: | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/4/788 |
| _version_ | 1849478672681009152 |
|---|---|
| author | Long Jiang Jianxi Yao Zuyuan Liu |
| author_facet | Long Jiang Jianxi Yao Zuyuan Liu |
| author_sort | Long Jiang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
| description | Currently, the RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes) method is widely recognized as a prevalent approach for computing ship maneuvering forces and moments. Obtaining hydrodynamic derivatives using pure RANS is time-consuming, especially with rotating propellers. A reasonable simplification of the propeller is usually necessary to improve simulation efficiency. The ITTC suggests both the discretized propeller model (DPM) and the body-force model (BFM) for RANS simulations. While BFM offers computational efficiency, it may not accurately represent large-amplitude ship maneuvers. It is quite significant to figure out how BFM affects numerical accuracy. This study compares the DPM and a very simple BFM in RANS simulations of the KCS (KRISO Container Ship), focusing on static rudder, drift, and circle motion tests. The main purpose is to check the differences between the simulated results by using the BFM and DPM. While side forces and yaw moments from both models are similar, discrepancies in longitudinal forces increase with higher rudder angles, drift angles, or turning rates. Errors in side forces and yaw moments are under 10% for both models, compared with experimental data. But BFM’s longitudinal force errors exceed 20% at large motion amplitudes, indicating reduced accuracy compared to DPM. The results of the BFM method are subject to two main sources of error. First, the lack of physical shape representation for the propeller blades leads to the absence of lather force during rotation. This in turn results in an inaccurate prediction of the interaction between the propeller blade root or blade tip leakage vortices and the rudder. Second, the limitations of the adopted model prevent it from accurately providing the thrust and torque generated by the propeller under actual operating conditions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4d43cf7d9ffe484c8b2060ddde10ca45 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2077-1312 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-4d43cf7d9ffe484c8b2060ddde10ca452025-08-20T03:13:55ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122025-04-0113478810.3390/jmse13040788Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering ShipLong Jiang0Jianxi Yao1Zuyuan Liu2School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430062, ChinaSchool of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430062, ChinaSchool of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430062, ChinaCurrently, the RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes) method is widely recognized as a prevalent approach for computing ship maneuvering forces and moments. Obtaining hydrodynamic derivatives using pure RANS is time-consuming, especially with rotating propellers. A reasonable simplification of the propeller is usually necessary to improve simulation efficiency. The ITTC suggests both the discretized propeller model (DPM) and the body-force model (BFM) for RANS simulations. While BFM offers computational efficiency, it may not accurately represent large-amplitude ship maneuvers. It is quite significant to figure out how BFM affects numerical accuracy. This study compares the DPM and a very simple BFM in RANS simulations of the KCS (KRISO Container Ship), focusing on static rudder, drift, and circle motion tests. The main purpose is to check the differences between the simulated results by using the BFM and DPM. While side forces and yaw moments from both models are similar, discrepancies in longitudinal forces increase with higher rudder angles, drift angles, or turning rates. Errors in side forces and yaw moments are under 10% for both models, compared with experimental data. But BFM’s longitudinal force errors exceed 20% at large motion amplitudes, indicating reduced accuracy compared to DPM. The results of the BFM method are subject to two main sources of error. First, the lack of physical shape representation for the propeller blades leads to the absence of lather force during rotation. This in turn results in an inaccurate prediction of the interaction between the propeller blade root or blade tip leakage vortices and the rudder. Second, the limitations of the adopted model prevent it from accurately providing the thrust and torque generated by the propeller under actual operating conditions.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/4/788ship maneuvering motionRANSbody-force propeller modeldiscretized propeller model |
| spellingShingle | Long Jiang Jianxi Yao Zuyuan Liu Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship ship maneuvering motion RANS body-force propeller model discretized propeller model |
| title | Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship |
| title_full | Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship |
| title_fullStr | Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship |
| title_short | Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship |
| title_sort | analysis of the accuracy of a body force propeller model and a discretized propeller model in rans simulations of the flow around a maneuvering ship |
| topic | ship maneuvering motion RANS body-force propeller model discretized propeller model |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/13/4/788 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT longjiang analysisoftheaccuracyofabodyforcepropellermodelandadiscretizedpropellermodelinranssimulationsoftheflowaroundamaneuveringship AT jianxiyao analysisoftheaccuracyofabodyforcepropellermodelandadiscretizedpropellermodelinranssimulationsoftheflowaroundamaneuveringship AT zuyuanliu analysisoftheaccuracyofabodyforcepropellermodelandadiscretizedpropellermodelinranssimulationsoftheflowaroundamaneuveringship |
