Feasibility of regional center telehealth visits utilizing a rural research network in people with Parkinson’s disease

• Published in: Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
• Main Authors: Tuhin Virmani, Lakshmi Pillai, Veronica Smith, Aliyah Glover, Derek Abrams, Phillip Farmer, Shorabuddin Syed, Horace J. Spencer, Aaron Kemp, Kendall Barron, Tammaria Murray, Brenda Morris, Bendi Bowers, Angela Ward, Terri Imus, Linda J. Larson-Prior, Mitesh Lotia, Fred Prior
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-01-01
• Subjects: Telemedicine; health equity; rural health; ambulatory monitoring; Parkinson’s disease; medically underserved area
• Online Access: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866124004989/type/journal_article

Abstract Background: Impaired motor and cognitive function can make travel cumbersome for People with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD). Over 50% of PwPD cared for at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Movement Disorders Clinic reside over 30 miles from Little Rock. Improving access to clinical care for PwPD is needed. Objective: To explore the feasibility of remote clinic-to-clinic telehealth research visits for evaluation of multi-modal function in PwPD. Methods: PwPD residing within 30 miles of a UAMS Regional health center were enrolled and clinic-to-clinic telehealth visits were performed. Motor and non-motor disease assessments were administered and quantified. Results were compared to participants who performed at-home telehealth visits using the same protocols during the height of the COVID pandemic. Results: Compared to the at-home telehealth visit group (n = 50), the participants from regional centers (n = 13) had similar age and disease duration, but greater disease severity with higher total Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale scores (Z = −2.218, p = 0.027) and lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (Z = −3.350, p < 0.001). Regional center participants had lower incomes (Pearson’s chi = 21.3, p < 0.001), higher costs to attend visits (Pearson’s chi = 16.1, p = 0.003), and lived in more socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods (Z = −3.120, p = 0.002). Prior research participation was lower in the regional center group (Pearson’s chi = 4.5, p = 0.034) but both groups indicated interest in future research participation. Conclusions: Regional center research visits in PwPD in medically underserved areas are feasible and could help improve access to care and research participation in these traditionally underrepresented populations.