A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience

• Published in: Urology Annals
• Main Authors: Fouad Zanaty, Alaa Mousa, Mohamed Elgharabawy, Mohamed Elshazly, Sultan Sultan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
• Subjects: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; prone position; supine position
• Online Access: http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2022;volume=14;issue=2;spage=172;epage=176;aulast=Zanaty

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for treatment of large renal stone >2 cm. The prone position is the classical position preferred by most surgeons. Aiming to improve patient anesthesia and surgery-related inconveniences of the prone position, Valdivia et al., 1987, described the performance of PCNL with the patient in the supine position. Hence, we aimed to study the safety and efficacy of flank-free modified supine position in PCNL compared to the standard prone position. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study for 60 patients with large renal stones planned for PCNL operation during the period from November 2017 to May 2019. Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients each group): Group A – patients underwent PCNL in the prone position and Group B – patients underwent PCNL in the modified flank supine position. Patients' demographics, stone size, Hounsfield unit with intraoperative details as fluoroscopy time, operative time, and complications were recorded. Postoperatively, need for or not to blood transfusions, hospital stay, stone-free status, and postoperative complications were assessed. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the prone and supine positions regarding stone size (4 cm vs. 4.5 cm, P = 0.16), Hounsfield unit (940 HU vs. 955 HU, P = 0.78), body mass index (31.2 kg/m2 vs. 32.5 kg/m2, P = 0.49), fluoroscopy time (6.9 min vs. 7.3 min, P = 0.5), operative time (89.5 min vs. 90.4 min, P = 0.9), residual stones (10% vs. 20%, P = 0.8), and hospital stay (45.6 h vs. 48.6 h, P = 0.5). Fever occurred in 3.3% of cases in each group and urine leakage observed in one patient with prone position. No blood transfusion was needed in both the groups. Conclusions: PCNL in the modified supine position proved to be a safe and effective choice compared to the prone position for adult patients with large renal calculi.