Intrauterine Adhesions and Asherman Syndrome: A Retrospective Dive into Predictive Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Surgical Perspectives

<b>Background</b>: Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) or Asherman syndrome (AS) represent pathological conditions that affect the endometrium and significantly influence female fertility through a variety of mechanisms. This study aims to identify risk factors, explore pathophysiological mech...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diagnostics
Main Authors: Loredana Maria Toma, Demetra Socolov, Daniela Matei, Sorana Anton, Raluca Balan, Emil Anton, Roxana Covali, Mihaela Tirnovanu, Handra Elicona, Theodor Pantilimonescu, Razvan Socolov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/8/955
_version_ 1849479655549042688
author Loredana Maria Toma
Demetra Socolov
Daniela Matei
Sorana Anton
Raluca Balan
Emil Anton
Roxana Covali
Mihaela Tirnovanu
Handra Elicona
Theodor Pantilimonescu
Razvan Socolov
author_facet Loredana Maria Toma
Demetra Socolov
Daniela Matei
Sorana Anton
Raluca Balan
Emil Anton
Roxana Covali
Mihaela Tirnovanu
Handra Elicona
Theodor Pantilimonescu
Razvan Socolov
author_sort Loredana Maria Toma
collection DOAJ
container_title Diagnostics
description <b>Background</b>: Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) or Asherman syndrome (AS) represent pathological conditions that affect the endometrium and significantly influence female fertility through a variety of mechanisms. This study aims to identify risk factors, explore pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and assess how medical background influence the development of these conditions. It also seeks to associate the severity of conditions with clinical outcomes, such as fertility, miscarriages, and menstrual cycle disorders, using American Fertility Society (AFS) scoring system. <b>Materials and methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included 134 patients aged 18 to 45, who followed hysteroscopy between 2016 and 2024 at two hospitals in Iasi, focusing on those diagnosed with IUAs (102 patients) and AS (32 patients), based on hysteroscopic approach. The exclusions were based of factors like acute uterine bleeding, intrauterine device, obesity and other severe conditions. <b>Results and discussions</b>: Women over 35 years are more likely to develop these conditions due to prior gynaecological procedures which are often associated with fertility issues. Hysteroscopy is established as the gold standard for both diagnosis and treatment, intraoperative diagnosis representing 45.6 % of cases. Amenorrhea is a primary indicator in AS patients (OR = 26.19) and dysmenorrhea as a potential marker for IUAs (OR = 2.67). Patients with IUAs and primary infertility (82.9%) typically have an AFS score 1, corresponding to improved conception rates. Those with AS and primary infertility often present an AFS score 2 (54.5%); patients with AS and secondary infertility were linked to AFS score 3 (58.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.137). Although the incidence of miscarriages is comparable between the two groups, the timing differs: IUAs are predominantly associated with first trimester losses (64.9%), whereas AS is more commonly linked to second trimester miscarriages (45.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlights the necessity of a personalized approach in diagnosing and treating IUAs and AS, considering factors such as age, fertility index, and disease severity. The integration of hysteroscopic techniques with individualized treatment plans based on the patient’s unique medical profile is crucial for adequate management of IUAs and AS.
format Article
id doaj-art-4e3473b09fcb4cf28d2852ee0b24ba42
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2075-4418
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-4e3473b09fcb4cf28d2852ee0b24ba422025-08-20T03:13:30ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182025-04-0115895510.3390/diagnostics15080955Intrauterine Adhesions and Asherman Syndrome: A Retrospective Dive into Predictive Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Surgical PerspectivesLoredana Maria Toma0Demetra Socolov1Daniela Matei2Sorana Anton3Raluca Balan4Emil Anton5Roxana Covali6Mihaela Tirnovanu7Handra Elicona8Theodor Pantilimonescu9Razvan Socolov10Department of Medical Bioscience, Faculty of Bioengineering, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700454 Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Mother and Child Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Medical Bioscience, Faculty of Bioengineering, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700454 Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Mother and Child Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, RomaniaClinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology “Elena Doamna”, 700398 Iasi, RomaniaClinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology “Elena Doamna”, 700398 Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Medical Bioscience, Faculty of Bioengineering, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700454 Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Mother and Child Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Mother and Child Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, RomaniaDepartment of Morpho-Functional Sciences II—Physiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, RomaniaClinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynaecology “Elena Doamna”, 700398 Iasi, Romania<b>Background</b>: Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) or Asherman syndrome (AS) represent pathological conditions that affect the endometrium and significantly influence female fertility through a variety of mechanisms. This study aims to identify risk factors, explore pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and assess how medical background influence the development of these conditions. It also seeks to associate the severity of conditions with clinical outcomes, such as fertility, miscarriages, and menstrual cycle disorders, using American Fertility Society (AFS) scoring system. <b>Materials and methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included 134 patients aged 18 to 45, who followed hysteroscopy between 2016 and 2024 at two hospitals in Iasi, focusing on those diagnosed with IUAs (102 patients) and AS (32 patients), based on hysteroscopic approach. The exclusions were based of factors like acute uterine bleeding, intrauterine device, obesity and other severe conditions. <b>Results and discussions</b>: Women over 35 years are more likely to develop these conditions due to prior gynaecological procedures which are often associated with fertility issues. Hysteroscopy is established as the gold standard for both diagnosis and treatment, intraoperative diagnosis representing 45.6 % of cases. Amenorrhea is a primary indicator in AS patients (OR = 26.19) and dysmenorrhea as a potential marker for IUAs (OR = 2.67). Patients with IUAs and primary infertility (82.9%) typically have an AFS score 1, corresponding to improved conception rates. Those with AS and primary infertility often present an AFS score 2 (54.5%); patients with AS and secondary infertility were linked to AFS score 3 (58.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.137). Although the incidence of miscarriages is comparable between the two groups, the timing differs: IUAs are predominantly associated with first trimester losses (64.9%), whereas AS is more commonly linked to second trimester miscarriages (45.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlights the necessity of a personalized approach in diagnosing and treating IUAs and AS, considering factors such as age, fertility index, and disease severity. The integration of hysteroscopic techniques with individualized treatment plans based on the patient’s unique medical profile is crucial for adequate management of IUAs and AS.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/8/955intrauterine adhesionsAsherman syndromeintrauterine synechiaeendometrial injuryinfertility
spellingShingle Loredana Maria Toma
Demetra Socolov
Daniela Matei
Sorana Anton
Raluca Balan
Emil Anton
Roxana Covali
Mihaela Tirnovanu
Handra Elicona
Theodor Pantilimonescu
Razvan Socolov
Intrauterine Adhesions and Asherman Syndrome: A Retrospective Dive into Predictive Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Surgical Perspectives
intrauterine adhesions
Asherman syndrome
intrauterine synechiae
endometrial injury
infertility
title Intrauterine Adhesions and Asherman Syndrome: A Retrospective Dive into Predictive Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Surgical Perspectives
title_full Intrauterine Adhesions and Asherman Syndrome: A Retrospective Dive into Predictive Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Surgical Perspectives
title_fullStr Intrauterine Adhesions and Asherman Syndrome: A Retrospective Dive into Predictive Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Surgical Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Intrauterine Adhesions and Asherman Syndrome: A Retrospective Dive into Predictive Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Surgical Perspectives
title_short Intrauterine Adhesions and Asherman Syndrome: A Retrospective Dive into Predictive Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Surgical Perspectives
title_sort intrauterine adhesions and asherman syndrome a retrospective dive into predictive risk factors diagnosis and surgical perspectives
topic intrauterine adhesions
Asherman syndrome
intrauterine synechiae
endometrial injury
infertility
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/8/955
work_keys_str_mv AT loredanamariatoma intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT demetrasocolov intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT danielamatei intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT soranaanton intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT ralucabalan intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT emilanton intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT roxanacovali intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT mihaelatirnovanu intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT handraelicona intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT theodorpantilimonescu intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives
AT razvansocolov intrauterineadhesionsandashermansyndromearetrospectivediveintopredictiveriskfactorsdiagnosisandsurgicalperspectives