Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital.
<h4>Background & objectives</h4>Some hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients remain underdiagnosed at a large hospital. The electronic medical record (EMR) alert system can increase in-hospital screening. This study evaluates the effectiveness of screening among outpatients and assesses var...
| Published in: | PLoS ONE |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333940 |
| _version_ | 1848758240563691520 |
|---|---|
| author | Cheng-Kuan Lin Yu-Sen Peng Chi-Yu Yang |
| author_facet | Cheng-Kuan Lin Yu-Sen Peng Chi-Yu Yang |
| author_sort | Cheng-Kuan Lin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | PLoS ONE |
| description | <h4>Background & objectives</h4>Some hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients remain underdiagnosed at a large hospital. The electronic medical record (EMR) alert system can increase in-hospital screening. This study evaluates the effectiveness of screening among outpatients and assesses variations in physician engagement across different specialties.<h4>Methods</h4>From December 2022 to April 2023, outpatients aged 45-79 years, with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease, who did not have anti-HCV data in their EMR were identified. A pop-up alert prompted physicians to either order anti-HCV testing or refer patients for a health check-up. The frequency of alerts, physician response rates, blood test completion rates, and HCV seropositivity were analyzed by specialty.<h4>Results</h4>Of 85,320 alerts generated, 61.4% elicited a physician response. Internal Medicine clinics had significantly higher response rates than non-Internal Medicine clinics (77.5% versus 44.6%, P < 0.01). Among patients with physician responses, 30.9% completed the study, with markedly higher completion when blood tests were directly ordered compared to referrals (88.4% versus 7.2%, P < 0.01). The monthly number of screenings increased tenfold after the system was implemented. Overall, 22,377 patients (26.2%) were screened, and 485 (2.17%) were seropositive. One-fourth of seropositive cases were identified in non-Internal Medicine clinics, where the positivity rate was higher (2.7% versus 2.04%, P = 0.01).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Short-term use of the EMR alert system increased HCV detection among outpatients. The default test orders in the EMR improved completion rates more than referrals to a health check-up. There were differences in physician engagement and seropositive case detection among specialties. Targeted interventions, particularly among specialties with lower engagement, are necessary to improve the success of HCV screening. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4e7f0590f0784e5ea1e5e1dbc3dc7c21 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-4e7f0590f0784e5ea1e5e1dbc3dc7c212025-10-15T05:31:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-012010e033394010.1371/journal.pone.0333940Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital.Cheng-Kuan LinYu-Sen PengChi-Yu Yang<h4>Background & objectives</h4>Some hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients remain underdiagnosed at a large hospital. The electronic medical record (EMR) alert system can increase in-hospital screening. This study evaluates the effectiveness of screening among outpatients and assesses variations in physician engagement across different specialties.<h4>Methods</h4>From December 2022 to April 2023, outpatients aged 45-79 years, with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease, who did not have anti-HCV data in their EMR were identified. A pop-up alert prompted physicians to either order anti-HCV testing or refer patients for a health check-up. The frequency of alerts, physician response rates, blood test completion rates, and HCV seropositivity were analyzed by specialty.<h4>Results</h4>Of 85,320 alerts generated, 61.4% elicited a physician response. Internal Medicine clinics had significantly higher response rates than non-Internal Medicine clinics (77.5% versus 44.6%, P < 0.01). Among patients with physician responses, 30.9% completed the study, with markedly higher completion when blood tests were directly ordered compared to referrals (88.4% versus 7.2%, P < 0.01). The monthly number of screenings increased tenfold after the system was implemented. Overall, 22,377 patients (26.2%) were screened, and 485 (2.17%) were seropositive. One-fourth of seropositive cases were identified in non-Internal Medicine clinics, where the positivity rate was higher (2.7% versus 2.04%, P = 0.01).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Short-term use of the EMR alert system increased HCV detection among outpatients. The default test orders in the EMR improved completion rates more than referrals to a health check-up. There were differences in physician engagement and seropositive case detection among specialties. Targeted interventions, particularly among specialties with lower engagement, are necessary to improve the success of HCV screening.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333940 |
| spellingShingle | Cheng-Kuan Lin Yu-Sen Peng Chi-Yu Yang Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital. |
| title | Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital. |
| title_full | Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital. |
| title_fullStr | Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital. |
| title_short | Differences among specialists in using the Electronic Medical Record alert system for HCV screening in outpatients at a large general hospital. |
| title_sort | differences among specialists in using the electronic medical record alert system for hcv screening in outpatients at a large general hospital |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333940 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chengkuanlin differencesamongspecialistsinusingtheelectronicmedicalrecordalertsystemforhcvscreeninginoutpatientsatalargegeneralhospital AT yusenpeng differencesamongspecialistsinusingtheelectronicmedicalrecordalertsystemforhcvscreeninginoutpatientsatalargegeneralhospital AT chiyuyang differencesamongspecialistsinusingtheelectronicmedicalrecordalertsystemforhcvscreeninginoutpatientsatalargegeneralhospital |
